Github user lizhanhui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
> We'd better not merge the PR if the opinion fails to unite
Agree. But this is a minor change to fix obvious corner case mis-handling.
Proposing review points are carefully considere
Github user vongosling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
Usually, we need 3 committers to review PR. We'd better not merge the PR
if the opinion fails to unite
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784819/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784819)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 25.814% when pulling
**57111a02721ac8d70d
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784819/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784819)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 25.814% when pulling
**57111a02721ac8d70d
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784819/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784819)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 25.814% when pulling
**57111a02721ac8d70d
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784804/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784804)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 25.854% when pulling
**b8e53c990e0b467c2a
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784804/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784804)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 25.854% when pulling
**b8e53c990e0b467c2a
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784804/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/9784804)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 25.854% when pulling
**b8e53c990e0b467c2a
Github user zhouxinyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
@lizhanhui Also please add some unit tests -:)..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zhouxinyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
I checked ConsumeQueue#correctMinOffset, and you are right this method
won't work as expected in this situation.
Please @vintagewang @vongosling help review this PR.
---
If you
Github user lizhanhui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
> what's the appearance/effect of this BUG?
Reported bug description is consume queue files cannot be automatically
deleted and took up large portion of disk.
> IMO, it'
Github user zhouxinyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/39
Hi, @lizhanhui , what's the appearance/effect of this BUG?
Let's start from the next round.
IMO, it's ok when ConsumeQueue-MappedFile hold failed, this file will be
rele
12 matches
Mail list logo