Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

Again, please explain what issue you see. I spent a lot of time on this. I dont feel like redoing all the work without proper justification. You are welcome to rework this if you think it is necessary. Thanks, Om On Mar 5, 2018 12:15 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: Hi Om,

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

Hi Om, Way back in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/70fd5fa65f60ed35a4d2097c8e2dab19320b6b 549b3f87894789dc27@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E I suggested using https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blank_US_map_borders.svg Do you have time to switch us over that instead? I think that will

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

The issue is like this: CC-BY 3.0 is considered Category B which can be included in binary (unmodified) form.[1] Including the paths of the SVG in MapCoords is a questionable use of Category B and we would need approval from legal to use it like that. We have three options: 1. We can ask legal

Re: TypeNames vs ClassName

> On Mar 5, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Why are there so many empty strings and why do the cost so much? Should > we reference a single global empty string? If you mean in XML, I eliminated initializing *everything* in XML unless needed and I saw a

Re: My first experience with SVG

Hi Alex, Don't know if I understand correctly your suggestion but don't think so. it seems that one of the recommendations to get SVG to be responsive is just remove width and height in the own SVG file. I see that solves many problems. 2018-03-05 0:34 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui

Re: TypeNames vs ClassName

Harbs please post code snippets so we can understand what you are referring to. I'm not too concerned about how much code is baked into MDL, but I'm more interested in the notion that there are just-in-case patterns that are somehow more optimal than on-demand patterns. I'm thinking there are

separation within components

Hi, just want to ask how to separate components a bit so there's some space between them, right now all components I have are without any room within them. maybe there's some component to do this? thanks -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: My first experience with SVG

OK, let me try asking it this way: What does the SVG look like for a 100x100 button vs a 200x200 button vs a NxM button? The key thing for me is that, in Royale, we are always creating dynamic pages instead of static pages. And that gives us more options to solve problems that aren't otherwise

Re: separation within components

Hi Alex, I tried the Vertical layout with gap and the Spacer and both works ok in SWF in my current example. For me the first one is ok since I only want little space between components in my testings. thanks! 2018-03-05 17:29 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > Are you

Re: My first experience with SVG

OK, if border-image works on the browsers we care about that's fine with me. If it wasn't working, then we could have our own extensions that make it work. -Alex On 3/5/18, 10:57 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"

Re: My first experience with SVG

Hi Alex, I'm getting different sizes ok. The problem I want to pursue is to get for designers a direct way to author some graph and then use it directly in the Royale App. For us the main need here is 9 slice scaling, since normaly UI controls (buttons, text inputs, scrollbars,...) use to be

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

I consider this issue resolved (please read my full email). You are welcome to take this to Legal Discuss if you wish. Thanks, Om On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > Thanks for the explanation. I think I see where the disconnect is now.

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

HI, > Thanks for the explanation. I think I see where the disconnect is now. > Here is what I based my decision on: > > The artifact I used [1] is based on the author's own earlier work available > at [2] The original author of [1] is “Theshibboleth” while the author of [2] is

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

Hi Om, I am not able to follow your logic. I think I've read your full email and have looked at the links. It appears you are trying to say that the data points we are using came from [1], but to me, [1] seems clearly under GNU Document and CC-BY-SA. The act of removing the state names from

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Om, > > I am not able to follow your logic. I think I've read your full email and > have looked at the links. It appears you are trying to say that the data > points we are using came from [1], but to me, [1]

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

Hi Om, Comments inline. On 3/5/18, 3:09 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Alex Harui >wrote: > >> Hi Om, >> >> I am not able to follow your logic. I