Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #805

2018-05-16 Thread apacheroyaleci
See Changes: [yishayjobs] Make ComboBoxView more reusable [yishayjobs] remove from controller logic which is handled by view --

Re: Transferring Collections with RemoteObject/AMF

2018-05-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr, right! I think we still have something wrong. Let me explain: I'm right now trying to make a first communication with our company app. I get to communicate from Royale to Java sending a populate type object, but I'm still don't get the response ok, I'm getting a "Failed decoding the

Re: Transferring Collections with RemoteObject/AMF

2018-05-16 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Carlos, I'm wondering now what should be on the AMF PHP sight to have it working. Maybe I will try to find some time to investigate it. Since on Java HashSet is ok, maybe on PHP sight there is something which can accept ArrayList. ;) Thanks, Piotr 2018-05-16 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira

Transferring Collections with RemoteObject/AMF

2018-05-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, just let you know that I tried to retrieve a Collection from Java with RemoteObject/AMF, and that worked without problem. I updated the example with this test that compose a java.util.Set (a HashSet), send it and we get it in Royale as a royale ArrayList. I'm a bit surprised that this works

Re: Transferring Collections with RemoteObject/AMF

2018-05-16 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Carlos, Last time when I was testing AMF PHP it was working fine on my sight. I had to just push application in the same place as AMF server. I didn't test it in Safari. Great to hear that! Congrats! Thanks, Piotr 2018-05-16 15:46 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Piotr, >

Re: Transferring Collections with RemoteObject/AMF

2018-05-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Piotr, I finally get total communication with my Backend!! :D The problem is localized in Safari. I was testing all the time with Safari, and then I tried with Chrome and it worked. I tried with Firefox as well and worked as well. So we have some bug that generates some problem in

Re: Transferring Collections with RemoteObject/AMF

2018-05-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr, finaly Safari works ok as well, I was checked some development tools and seems that was interfering, so for now works great in all 3 browsers (still need to test on Windows IE11 and Edge), so not need to fill any bug for now ;) About the place where you run the client, right, you need

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #807

2018-05-16 Thread apacheroyaleci
See -- [...truncated 1.77 MB...] [mxmlc] org.apache.royale.html.ButtonBar depends on org.apache.royale.html.List [mxmlc]

Re: 0.9.3 Release

2018-05-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:42 AM Harbs wrote: > Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes currently > in develop? The fixes need to go into develop so that we can simply cut a release branch of off develop. If not we will have to cherry pick. What is

Re: 0.9.3 Release

2018-05-16 Thread Harbs
Right now I’m pretty sure we have classes with changed package names. That will break existing applications. I doubt we’re going to be finished with the “refactor” discussion before we get the 0.9.3 release out. I’d like to be sure that no package names are changed in this release. I don’t

Re: [DISCUSS] Explanation of the changes

2018-05-16 Thread Harbs
I guess it depends. As long as the styling is set by class selectors, it will work because class selectors trump type selectors. I think it would at least be better than what we have now. > On May 16, 2018, at 10:42 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Would that work? I

Re: 0.9.3 Release

2018-05-16 Thread Harbs
different *swcs* (I really need to turn off auto-correct…) > On May 16, 2018, at 10:33 PM, Harbs wrote: > > different secs

Re: [DISCUSS] Explanation of the changes

2018-05-16 Thread Alex Harui
Would that work? I think any TLC with an HTMLButtonElement as its element (or sub-element) will still be affected by any Button type selector in some CSS file. Or maybe I don't fully understand what you are proposing. -Alex On 5/16/18, 9:41 AM, "Harbs" wrote:

Re: 0.9.3 Release

2018-05-16 Thread Harbs
The last time I checked, the last commit that worked on existing apps was 88cffe995de541584024cbf38eb016acfc677f98 I have not checked develop for the last 11 commits or so. Unless package names have been reverted I assume the problem still exists. I see three options: 1. Revert develop back to

Re: 0.9.3 Release

2018-05-16 Thread Alex Harui
I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question. You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their history on GitHub. Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM

Re: [DISCUSS] Explanation of the changes

2018-05-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
I'm not sure that making different namespaces be interpreted in different ways would be good. That kind of things would be things that people coming would need to now or they will find problems when using Royale. In the other hand that kind of things (this work in this way for A but works in this

Re: Transferring Collections with RemoteObject/AMF

2018-05-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Just tried AMF in Edge and IE11 and both works as well :) 2018-05-16 16:13 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Piotr, > > finaly Safari works ok as well, I was checked some development tools and > seems that was interfering, so for now works great in all 3 browsers (still >