Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-10 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, yes, I already did some days ago an uploaded to website If you search for some new class (like jewel SimpleButton) it appears now. El jue., 10 oct. 2019 a las 11:49, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > Did you make an update API doc ? -> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-10 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Carlos, Did you make an update API doc ? -> https://royale.apache.org/asdoc/index.html Thanks, Piotr pon., 7 paź 2019 o 19:38 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > yes, I'll do in next few hours. > thanks. > > El lun., 7 oct. 2019 a las 9:54, Piotr Zarzycki (< >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr, yes, I'll do in next few hours. thanks. El lun., 7 oct. 2019 a las 9:54, Piotr Zarzycki () escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > Will you be able update website with links for 0.9.6 release ? > > Thanks, > Piotr > > niedz., 6 paź 2019 o 10:52 Piotr Zarzycki > napisał(a): > > > Hi Alex, > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-07 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Carlos, Will you be able update website with links for 0.9.6 release ? Thanks, Piotr niedz., 6 paź 2019 o 10:52 Piotr Zarzycki napisał(a): > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for the fix. Everything worked fine this time. > > Piotr > > sob., 5 paź 2019 o 01:51 Alex Harui napisał(a): > >> I found

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-06 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Alex, Thank you for the fix. Everything worked fine this time. Piotr sob., 5 paź 2019 o 01:51 Alex Harui napisał(a): > I found some time to try the releasecandidate.xml and found the problem. > I pushed the fix to release/0.9.6. So try that and see what happens. It > seemed to do the

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-04 Thread Alex Harui
I found some time to try the releasecandidate.xml and found the problem. I pushed the fix to release/0.9.6. So try that and see what happens. It seemed to do the right thing for me on my Windows computer. You will next likely run into several merge conflicts. I have not looked into the

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-04 Thread Alex Harui
If we don't fix the release scripts, then the next RM is probably going to run into the same problem. The time we spend now helps save time in the future. It is wise to improve the process now in case I get run over by a bus tomorrow. If you do it manually and make a mistake, we might not

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-04 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Alex, Can I just do that changes manually on release branch and merge stuff to develop? I just don't won't to spend any more minute on release process anymore. 1) I should change build properties 2) I should change all poms Is there anymore place which I should know to change? Thanks, Piotr

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-04 Thread Alex Harui
Piotr, Again, I am asking you to get in the mindset of a developer and not just a user. You can see that the Ant script is making some updates. You can verify that the release branch does not have 0.9.7 for the release.version in build.properties. You can see there is 1 commit pending in

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-04 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Alex, Git status after failing for all 3 repos [1]. Here is how build.properties look like after performing update.versions target [2]. I will skip some part to move forward but update.versions is important. [1] https://paste.apache.org/l3zs9 [2] https://paste.apache.org/0zvou Thanks,

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-03 Thread Alex Harui
What does "git status" show in the 3 repos? The update.versions should have at least changed the build.properties file in the repo. You can try skipping over steps by listing the steps on the command line. You might need to list some pre-requisite steps before or add them to the "depends" of

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-03 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Those are the steps from the script which need to be done still: 1) 2) 3) Number #1 is failing. czw., 3 paź 2019 o 10:41 Piotr Zarzycki napisał(a): > It looks like we already have: > 1) Successfully published npm: > https://www.npmjs.com/package/@apache-royale/royale-js > 2) Successfully

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-03 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
It looks like we already have: 1) Successfully published npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@apache-royale/royale-js 2) Successfully published which can be updated on the website: https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.6/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js.tar.gz Thanks, Piotr czw., 3

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-03 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I have used npm password from private and went trough publishing npm and it's failed on next step update.version with the same error. Here you go full log [1]. What will happen if I run publish npm stuff again ? I can omit that part in the next attempt. Om can you check whether my npm publish

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-02 Thread Alex Harui
Responses inline... On 10/2/19, 1:37 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: Just to understand something. releasecandidate script is using tag instead release branch to whole operation of increase version ? No, the "get_head_of_rc_branches" target should get you the head. > Hi, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-02 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Just to understand something. releasecandidate script is using tag instead release branch to whole operation of increase version ? Cause on release branch I have already version increased, so what's the point of doing anything using tag ? śr., 2 paź 2019 o 10:27 Piotr Zarzycki napisał(a): > Hi,

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-02 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi, I just tried releasecandidate script. It contains following steps. One step previous was move in svn binaries from dev folder to release - I omit that cause I did it already manually. Launching following steps I reached

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:32 AM Alex Harui wrote: > The releasecandidate.xml script will tell you what to do on > repository.apache.org to release the Maven stuff, and release the npm > stuff as well. The whole point of these scripts is so you don't have to > ask for help. If you do end up

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-01 Thread Alex Harui
Releasecandidate.xml can't do steps on repository.apache.org. It will remind you to go there and release the staged artifacts. -Alex On 10/1/19, 6:55 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: I see that releasecandidate.xml script can help me with last steps. Does it doing Maven releases as well

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-01 Thread Alex Harui
The releasecandidate.xml script will tell you what to do on repository.apache.org to release the Maven stuff, and release the npm stuff as well. The whole point of these scripts is so you don't have to ask for help. If you do end up needing help, then the scripts need improving. We want to

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-01 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I see that releasecandidate.xml script can help me with last steps. Does it doing Maven releases as well ? That steps includes also push to svn - I just did it manually, so I will probably comment out commit part and run script. - I think tomorrow. wt., 1 paź 2019 o 09:29 Piotr Zarzycki

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-01 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Om, What I need to do in order to release stuff on npm. Can you do this for me once I push release to svn ? Thanks, Piotr wt., 1 paź 2019 o 09:25 Piotr Zarzycki napisał(a): > Hi Harbs, > > I think we have enough votes. I still have to gather info how actually > release Maven artifacts.

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-01 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Harbs, I think we have enough votes. I still have to gather info how actually release Maven artifacts. However I'm going to push binaries today in svn. Thanks, Piotr sob., 28 wrz 2019 o 20:02 Harbs napisał(a): > FYI, I will not be able to test the release until Wednesday. > > If the vote

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-28 Thread Harbs
FYI, I will not be able to test the release until Wednesday. If the vote is still open, I plan on testing then. Thanks, Harbs > On Sep 25, 2019, at 5:24 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > Ok, new and hopefully the last one RC3. I didn't run ApproveScript myself > yet, but will do that tomorrow or

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-28 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, About Vars: I have: - ANT_HOME - MAVEN_OPTS - JAVA_HOME, - GOOG_HOME - ROYALE_HOME - ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME - ROYALE_TYPEDEFS_HOME - FLEX_HOME (I supposed this last one can be removed too, but didn't notice I commented - PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME -

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-28 Thread Alex Harui
What environment variables are set? What settings did Piotr recommend and what did you actually use? If you can post a link to the entire log it might help. For example, if you didn't see the ASCII art for "FLEX" then the extensions did not kick in. By the time you get around to building a

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-27 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, ok, seems the latest test didn't work. it failed here: [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 01:38 min [INFO] Finished at:

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
Thanks for trying it. I just updated the ApproveRoyale.xml linked to in the vote thread to try to eliminate people getting the wrong one.. -Alex On 9/26/19, 1:48 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: Thank you, Alex! I tried your changes with adobe/royale artifacts deleted from .m2, and I was

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Josh Tynjala
Thank you, Alex! I tried your changes with adobe/royale artifacts deleted from .m2, and I was able to get through both js and js-swf builds successfully. Carlos, I think that these changes will allow you to get through the process now too. For everyone's convenience, here's a link to the latest

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
Yeah, I just saw that myself. That's because I didn't merge in my changes correctly. I just pushed one that seems to be working better. -Alex On 9/26/19, 10:27 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: Thanks, Alex. The ApproveRoyale.mxml from the latest release/0.9.6 is working for me if I delete

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
Looks like I missed a commit. I just pushed the ApproveRoyale.xml I was using to the release branch. Try that one and see if it works better. It shouldn't require the workaround you used. Thanks, -Alex On 9/25/19, 4:16 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: To get the system property working with

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Josh Tynjala
To get the system property working with ApproveRoyale.xml, I added the following line to each of the mvn commands in my local copy of ApproveRoyale.xml: This should work for anyone using Bash's yes command to quickly approve the license headers (after you've already done it once manually, of

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Josh Tynjala
I deleted all com.adobe artifacts in my Maven .m2 folder, and I can see the prompt to accept the license for the Adobe dependencies. The build output suggests that you can set a system property to accept the agreement, so I tried adding that property to my command, like this: ant -e -f

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Alex Harui
It depends on what you want to test. If you want to test the js-only (no Adobe stuff) paths, then yes, you need to make sure there are no Adobe environment variables: AIR_HOME PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER If you want to test with the Adobe stuff, then you will need to set all 3

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Josh, you're right, I have AIR_HOME in my .bash_profile set, since I left all env vars set (flex, air, playerglobal, royale) So, - should I remove some more in addition to AIR_HOME? additionally: - Should I use the settings from Piotr too? - Should I add -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true and

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Josh Tynjala
Carlos, Can you check to see if the AIR_HOME environment variable is set or not? If I'm understanding the logic in ApproveRoyale.xml, then you need to ensure that AIR_HOME is *NOT* set, unless you include -Duse-flash=true in your command. If AIR_HOME is set, then you should clear it. It may also

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Let's wait to Alex, I suppose something was not working as expected with the changes he did yesterday to solve this issue. El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 22:57, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Carlos, > > I can only propose copy player global in appropriate place and try

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Carlos, I can only propose copy player global in appropriate place and try again. I have no idea how to resolve your problem. Thanks, Piotr On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 10:37 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, yes, I copied in the RC2 thread what was appearing > > btw, I tried again adding the proposed

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, yes, I copied in the RC2 thread what was appearing btw, I tried again adding the proposed commands with no luck. The fail is the same as before: Downloading from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc [INFO]

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
By endless loop you mean that script cannot download playerglobal - Asking for the license? On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 8:25 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi > I tried in the meanwhile with your settings and enter in the endless loop > as in RC2 > > I'll try to run now adding that to the command and

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi I tried in the meanwhile with your settings and enter in the endless loop as in RC2 I'll try to run now adding that to the command and report back El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 18:59, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > The same issue as it was previously. You are

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
The same issue as it was previously. You are missing playerglobal - I don't know why at all. You can try to switch to my settings - don't forget update link to maven artifacts in it. I'm not sure also but maybe you should try to run approve script with this one: -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true and

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, sorry to report that my try failed. I tried with clean .m2 and my own settings.xml. Maybe I need to switch to the settings Piotr send to me? as well I used the instruction provided in email: ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=3

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I'm not sure how it happened this time, but yeah we finally have. ;) śr., 25 wrz 2019 o 17:54 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > great to see we have different threads in gmail :) > > El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 16:24, Piotr Zarzycki (< > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > Ok,

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr, great to see we have different threads in gmail :) El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 16:24, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Ok, new and hopefully the last one RC3. I didn't run ApproveScript myself > yet, but will do that tomorrow or next week. > > śr., 25 wrz 2019

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Ok, new and hopefully the last one RC3. I didn't run ApproveScript myself yet, but will do that tomorrow or next week. śr., 25 wrz 2019 o 16:23 Apache Royale CI Server napisał(a): > This is the discussion thread. > > Thanks, > Piotr -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon:

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
This is the discussion thread. Thanks, Piotr