Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi Piotr, changes are live! to fit logos, I must to pass all in a software to put in concrete sizes, so all looks in the same width and height and aspect ratios. for that reason the logo was showing too bigger. best :) Carlos 2018-04-06 13:54 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Carlos, I just updated logo with transparent background. Many Thanks! 2018-04-06 13:25 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Piotr, > > ok, I'm to leave now, but I'll do ASAIC. > Can you provide a logo in PNG with transparent bg?. That one is white > below. > > In the other

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

-- Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi Piotr, ok, I'm to leave now, but I'll do ASAIC. Can you provide a logo in PNG with transparent bg?. That one is white below. In the other hand, just my constructive opinion. The logo used in website seems to me more modern and clean than the moon one, for that reason I choose the one it's now

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi Carlos, I would like to change Moonshine IDE logo, but it looks like I'm not at good in that. :) Can you take a look once you get a change. I've uploaded logo, but it's too big. :) Thanks, Piotr 2018-04-02 19:43 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Ok, > > updated Prominic

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Ok, updated Prominic to Prominic.NET and change again from more easy to easier This changes are now live. thanks! Carlos 2018-04-02 0:27 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Carlos, > > The name of the Prominic should be - "Prominic.NET" > > Thanks for your update! >

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Carlos, The name of the Prominic should be - "Prominic.NET" Thanks for your update! Piotr On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 00:06 Carlos Rovira wrote: > ok Andrew, I changed "easier" for "more easy" as Dave suggested, > as you give me green light with Thanks-to, I'll be publishing

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Curiously, I also changed "more easy" to "easier". Did we end up with "easier easier"? On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > ok Andrew, I changed "easier" for "more easy" as Dave suggested, > as you give me green light with Thanks-to, I'll be publishing

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

ok Andrew, I changed "easier" for "more easy" as Dave suggested, as you give me green light with Thanks-to, I'll be publishing thanks! :) 2018-04-01 23:20 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore : > Did a quick pass on the IDEs page. Good to go now. > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:10 PM,

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Did a quick pass on the IDEs page. Good to go now. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I will do a text review very shortly > > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> Looks good. One comment

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

I will do a text review very shortly On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > Looks good. One comment “more easy” is better as “easier” > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Carlos Rovira > wrote: > > >

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi Carlos, Looks good. One comment “more easy” is better as “easier” Regards, Dave > On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Ok Dave, > > as I explained in my last email I put two lines for "supported" and "not > supported", let me know what do you think

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

I will get back to the pages within two hours. Cooking supper right now! On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Andrew, > > I updated the pages with the latest things commented here, could you do a > final review as you can? > > thanks! > > Carlos > > >

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Ok Dave, as I explained in my last email I put two lines for "supported" and "not supported", let me know what do you think thanks! Carlos 2018-04-01 22:31 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher : > > > On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Carlos Rovira > wrote: > > >

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi Dave, 2018-04-01 21:45 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher : > Hi - > > A few comments; > > (1) We need to have a disclaimer of sorts after the logos. > For thanks-to: “These are companies that are known to have helped the > project. If you know of others please let us know.” > done

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

> On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Hi, > > Regarding IntelliJ: Piotr uses it for Application development, so I think > we can maintain JetBrains thanks to. > But as there's no body using it as an IDE for develop Royale apps, and > there's no

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi, Regarding IntelliJ: Piotr uses it for Application development, so I think we can maintain JetBrains thanks to. But as there's no body using it as an IDE for develop Royale apps, and there's no support, we should remove it from IDEs. I don't think we should confuse visitors with more

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi - A few comments; (1) We need to have a disclaimer of sorts after the logos. For thanks-to: “These are companies that are known to have helped the project. If you know of others please let us know.” For IDEs: “These IDEs either offer native support or can be made to work for Royale

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

There are two tiers of IDE support, AIUI: those that just naturally support Royale, and those that can be tricked into supporting it if you know what you're doing. Maybe we should list both types, explaining the difference? On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 4:11 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018, 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira wrote: > I think IntelliJ doesn't have prime Royale support, but AFAICT people are > using this IDE with some concrete configurations. I think Om is one of > them. > No, Intellij has never worked for me with Royale. Although

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

That's bothers me also. Anyone from the PMCs and committers didn't spent any time to fill out instruction page with Intellij [1]. I assume that anyone is not using actively it for Application development. However I'm personally using Intellij for coding in SDK. - This makes me +1 to have

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

I think IntelliJ doesn't have prime Royale support, but AFAICT people are using this IDE with some concrete configurations. I think Om is one of them. Don't know if that could be a problem, but if people are working with IntelliJ in some way, although there's no real support (i.e Royale project

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Done with my edits. I am not sure whether IntelliJ supports Royale, so I just looked at the existing text. a On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:26 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I see IntelliJ in the list. I thought Royale does not work with IntelliJ. > Unless I missed this

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

I see IntelliJ in the list. I thought Royale does not work with IntelliJ. Unless I missed this development? Thanks, Om On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I have found the path now. > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Wetmore

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

I have found the path now. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I would do that, but I find the WP structure completely confusing. I > cannot find my way to the snippets that make up the pages. > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Carlos Rovira

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

I would do that, but I find the WP structure completely confusing. I cannot find my way to the snippets that make up the pages. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi Andrew, since you have website access, I think it's better that you > correct in the

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

Hi Andrew, since you have website access, I think it's better that you correct in the page directly freely. That would be more quick right? thanks! 2018-04-01 18:55 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore : > There are a few small issues. I will send an email with suggested changes > in

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

There are a few small issues. I will send an email with suggested changes in about an hour. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I will take a look > > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Carlos Rovira > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> just

Re: New Thanks-to and IDEs pages for review

I will take a look On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > just put some work to finaly create thanks-to and IDE pages. > > @Andrew, please can you take a look and correct any spelling you want > directly in the website? > >