Hi,
The vote of SEP-11 had been open for more than 72 hours and we got +1
(binding) x 3.
Votes are as follows:
+1 (binding) - Yi Pan, Xinyu Liu, Jagadish Venkatraman.
SEP-11 had officially passed the VOTE!
Thanks.
Hi Jagadish,
Thanks for your feedback.
I have added the suggestion test-case to the test plan.
Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Jagadish Venkatraman <
jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shanthoosh,
>
> As discussed earlier, I think we should add an explicit test-case for
> verifying
Shanthoosh,
As discussed earlier, I think we should add an explicit test-case for
verifying that we minimize partition movements during rolling upgrades.
Please update the proposal with this missing test-case. Other than this, +1
(binding) from my side.
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:30 PM,
Let's extend the vote to Monday 11:59PM PST.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:05 PM, xinyu liu wrote:
> +1 (binding). Look forward to the implementation.
>
> Xinyu
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Yi Pan wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding). Thanks for the
+1 (binding). Look forward to the implementation.
Xinyu
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Yi Pan wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the revisions!
>
> -Yi
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:39 PM, santhosh venkat <
> santhoshvenkat1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a
Hi,
This is a voting thread for SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.
For reference, here is the wiki link: https://cwiki.apache.org
/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75957309
Thanks.
Hi,
This is an official CANCEL for the SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone vote.
Thanks.
Hi, Santhoosh,
Overall looks good to me now. There are still some minor issues / errors in
the design doc
- in YARN, are you sure that we persist the JobModel to coordinator stream?
I checked the code and didn't find that. The JobModel was simply generated
and served from the memory in the
Hi everyone,
This is a voting thread for SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.
For reference, here is the wiki link:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75957309
Link to discussion mail thread: