Re: [sc-dev] Whom should I assign i56202 to (for QA)?

2007-05-31 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Muthu,

On Monday, 2007-05-28 21:51:39 +0530, Muthu Subramanian wrote:

   I fixed i56202 in msba01.
 [http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56202]

Beside being on the wrong branch and needs to be resynced to SRC680,
as Niklas already mentioned, the CWS lacks the following information,
that is to be filled in the EIS application:

- Owner, (!) probably because that is not set the CWS also doesn't show
  up in the list of CWSs that SeekQA.
- Description, what the CWS is about.
- Release, you should set that to OOo2.3 if that's the target).
- Estimated due date ready for QA (when the CWS approximately will be
  ready for QA. This is to give QA an idea when the CWS will be ready.
- Estimated due date, when the CWS should be ready for integration. Note
  that the time span between ready-for-QA date and the final due date
  needs to be communicated with the QA-rep. This is to give release
  engineering an idea when a CWS will show up for integration.
- Level of impact, in this case One Application.


After having resynced to the latests SRC680 milestone you'll have to
build install sets QA can use. Talk with the QA-rep (see below) what
he'll accept.

As a new feature/enhancement is implemented, you'll have to send
a feature announcement, in EIS that's under Changes-Mails - external
feature.

- Product: Spreadsheet
- Type: new
- Title: make up a good one, self-speaking
- Effective from version: CWS msba01
- Module(s) affected: sc
- Flags: select Configuration, Help/Guide, Translation, UI relevant
- TaskId: i56202
- Description: describe the feature such that QA can test the feature,
  documentation authors are able to digest the necessary information for
  the online help system, and the description can also be taken for the
  automated what's new guide.
- Specification URL: -
  (a literal minus/hyphen character, as the feature doesn't have an
  external specification document)


 Whom should I 'assign to', in EIS, for QA?

For Calc QA, you may ask Frank Stecher [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Oliver Craemer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if they can do QA or know someone who would.

 Next time, how do I find out whom to assign it to (when I fix some other
 issue)?

Get in contact with the project's dev-list, or ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] As
mentioned above, if proper information is filled in EIS, the CWS is also
listed under SeekQA and someone might jump on it.

  Eike

-- 
 OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 Please don't send personal mail to this [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use 
for
 mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [sc-dev] Whom should I assign i56202 to (for QA)?

2007-05-29 Thread Niklas Nebel

Muthu Subramanian wrote:

  I fixed i56202 in msba01.
[http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56202]

Whom should I 'assign to', in EIS, for QA?


It's on the wrong branch. OOF680 was used for 2.2.1. The CWS has to be 
resynced to a current SRC680 version first.


Niklas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]