+1 on the proposal.
-Kalyan
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> +1 with me.
>
> Colm.
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Sergio Pena
> wrote:
>
> > It sounds good to me.
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Stephen Moist
> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds good t
+1 with me.
Colm.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Sergio Pena
wrote:
> It sounds good to me.
> +1
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Stephen Moist wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me, do we have plans to migrate to the new date api?
> >
> > > On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Na Li wrote:
> > >
>
It sounds good to me.
+1
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Stephen Moist wrote:
> Sounds good to me, do we have plans to migrate to the new date api?
>
> > On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Na Li wrote:
> >
> > +1 - Lina
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Alexander Kolbasov >
> > wrote:
> >
Sounds good to me, do we have plans to migrate to the new date api?
> On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Na Li wrote:
>
> +1 - Lina
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Alexander Kolbasov
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Sentry hackers,
>>
>> We are now compiling Sentry with Java 8. I would like to propose
+1 - Lina
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Alexander Kolbasov
wrote:
> Hello Sentry hackers,
>
> We are now compiling Sentry with Java 8. I would like to propose allowing
> Java 8 features in Sentry code. As of now it is difficult to enforce strict
> Java 7 compatibility, so we may just as well