Hi,
We solved 115 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311208&version=12315741
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-026/
The RELEASE-NOTES file is included in the release and up to date.
My +1
However, Charles saw the examples/web/server/pom.xml file contains
4.3.0-SNAPSHOT in place of 4.3.0.
I'm gonna fix that on the trunk for the next release (4.4.0).
I propose to let 4.3.0 release as it is.
Regards
JB
On 02/20/2011 09:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
We s
+1
We do it in ACE simply using:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-source-plugin
attach-sources
verify
jar
Just to be sure:
you're talking about the sources coming from the tiers dependency ?
In that case, you need to add it in the bundle-pom.
Regards
JB
On 02/23/2011 01:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
+1
We do it in ACE simply using:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-source-plugin
a
ource plugin.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 14:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Just to be sure:
you're talking about the sources coming from the tiers dependency ?
In that case, you need to add it in the bundle-pom.
Regards
JB
On 02/23/2011 01:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
+1
We do it in
ted to use Blueprint
in place of Spring beans (I think it's more clear for the users) for
ServiceMix 4.4.0.
I think that we can promote the release as it's but we should add an
appendix concerning examples.
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 02/20/2011 09:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the update Freeman.
I promote the release like it is.
Anyway, I'm gonna work on examples for the 4.4.0 release.
Regards
JB
On 02/24/2011 08:27 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi,
Both issues are felix only(it's all ok with equinox)
On 2011-2-24, at 下午2:59, Jean-Baptiste On
4.3.0
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax.xml.namespace.QName not found
I will check why we have this error.
Regards,
Charles
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Team,
I would like to promote the release but my latest tests on examples don't
look
va:462)
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Team,
I would like to promote the release but my latest tests on examples don't
look fine
- features:install examples-cxf-nmr
NoClassDefFoundError: javax.xml.namespace.QName not found from bundle
[cxf-nmr]
- features:insta
eral times).
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 02/24/2011 08:59 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
This is not an excellent idea to promote a product with regression and
explain that Felix cannot be used
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
This one is solved switching to Equinox i
liver a quality product and this is not really a problem if
we postpone of some days. This release is under construction since a
couple of months.
Regards,
Charles
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
I don't remember if it worked before or not.
If you pre
tainer, and so far I think its
more known that Felix and people are more confortable using that.
So I am all in favor of +1. (non binding)
Its almost 1 year ago SMX 4.2 was released.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
The problem is it's not really ServiceMix re
ds,
Gert Vanthienen
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Thanks for the update Gert.
I'm gonna make a try following your instructions.
Anyway, what do we decide ?
Pro
and work really great.
Currently Equinox is the default container, and so far I think its
more known that Felix and people are more confortable using that.
So I am all in favor of +1. (non binding)
Its almost 1 year ago SMX 4.2 was released.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
4.3.0 release to vote tonight.
Sorry for this new cancellation :/
Regards
JB
On 02/20/2011 09:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
We solved 115 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311208&version=12315741
Staging repository:
h
c)
I will resubmit a new 4.3.0 release to vote tonight.
Sorry for this new cancellation :/
Regards
JB
On 02/20/2011 09:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
We solved 115 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311208&version=12315741
Stag
Nevermind,
I fixed this one.
Tests are in progress with the examples.
Regards
JB
On 02/25/2011 10:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on SMX4-764 to override and update Felix Framework to 3.0.8
version (in place of the 3.0.2 provided by Karaf).
I have an issue wit
Hi all,
as you already know, I canceled the ServiceMix 4.3.0 release due to
blocking issue on Felix Framework 3.0.2.
As you can see in SMX4-764, I've overrided the Felix Framework to 3.0.8
version.
I made tests on provided examples, you can see the result in the Jira.
I'm gonna make a test
I try the workaround proposed by Gert yesterday: set the examples in the
featuresBoot.
If it works, I will update the examples README.
Regards
JB
On 02/25/2011 04:32 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
as you already know, I canceled the ServiceMix 4.3.0 release due to
blocking issue on
Hi,
We fixed 120 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311208&version=12315741
Especially, all examples are usable directly in the distribution kit
(update of Felix Framework version to 3.0.9, fix on the features
descriptor, javax.xml.namesp
Hi all,
as you already know, the ServiceMix 4.3.0 vote is in progress.
I would like to release a maintenance release on the 3.x branch.
The expected version was ServiceMix 3.3.3 but, as we made major
dependencies update (ServiceMix Components 2011.01, Camel 2.6, CXF
2.3.2, Spring 3.0.5, etc),
release (ServiceMix 3 for now)
It's just my point of view, I'm waiting for the feedback from the team
about that.
Regards
JB
On 03/01/2011 01:37 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
How far is 3.x planned to go?
Em 01/03/2011 03:37, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>
become ServiceMix 4.x as soon as a first ServiceMix 5 RC is out.
* We deprecate the previous releases. Currently, it's ServiceMix 3.2,
3.1, 3.0. When ServiceMix 5 RC is out, ServiceMix 3.x will be deprecated.
WDYT ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 02/16/2011 10:25 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi al
Hi,
I don't want to split NMR. NMR (or the new proposed name, ServiceMix GL)
IS ServiceMix 4 :).
In fact ServiceMix 4 is a premium integration platform for other
projects (Karaf, CXF, Camel, ActiveMQ, ODE, etc) and the NMR.
So basically my answer is no, I prefer to keep NMR as the main
Servi
Hi Charles,
Thanks for launching the idea that we discussed on IRC.
As I said, my point of view is that we need a kind of median console
projects for Apache middleware projects.
For instance, a lot of stuff is share in all web console of these
projects (user authentication, authentication back
My +1
Regards
JB
On 02/27/2011 12:13 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
We fixed 120 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311208&version=12315741
Especially, all examples are usable directly in the distribution kit
(update of F
updated.
As soon as Apache websites are back, I will update the website.
Another work is in progress to promote a new website.
Many thanks to everyone.
Regards
JB
On 02/27/2011 12:13 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
We fixed 120 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
build ?
thank you,
Sorin.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
Sorry as I forget to send me my vote. +1 for me too
On 03/03/11 14:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Guillaume Nodet, Chris Cu
The ServiceMix team is pleased to announce the release of ServiceMix
version 4.3.0.
After several months of wait, this release of Apache ServiceMix contains
a multitude of new features, improvements, and bug fixes. Some
highlights include update of Karaf, Camel, CXF, ActiveMQ, ODE in use,
new
I like the Guillaume's idea about a ServiceMix survey to get a
feedback from the community.
I would like to make progress around this topic. Could we have some help
around that ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 02/16/2011 10:25 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
As you know, ServiceMix 4.3.0 r
Hi all,
I'm preparing the ServiceMix 3.4 release.
Could you have an agreement and an announce that this release will be the latest
ServiceMix 3 release and the latest based on Spring/JBI only ?
Is it OK for all ?
Regards
JB
Yeah, it's the plan :)
Regards
JB
On Thu 10/03/11 13:42, "Guillaume Nodet" gno...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sounds good to me. I think we should say so in the 3.4 release
> annoucement, right ?
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 13:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré et> wrote:
>
+1
Good idea Gert.
Regards
JB
On 03/14/2011 09:34 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,
If that's OK for people, I'll put in a GSoC proposal on behalf of the
ServiceMix community to continue the work that Marcin Wilkos started a
few years ago. He created the first few plugins for the Karaf
webco
+1
It looks good to me also.
Regards
JB
On 03/14/2011 09:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,
Just read the initial stab at the board report for this week at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/2011-03-16 -- look
pretty good to me!
How about we add a word or two about the document
Correct.
Thanks for the reminder Guillaume.
Regards
JB
On 03/14/2011 09:44 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
We need to report on the branding requirements for TLPs, see
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html
Otherwise looks good.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:36, Gert Vanthienen
wrote:
L.
Thanks for the warning Gert.
Indeed, I will take a look on that.
Regards
JB
On 03/14/2011 09:45 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,
When I look at our forums in Nabble, I notice some posts that are
never getting sent to the mailing list. For example, I don't find
http://servicemix.396122.n5.nab
Hi all,
as others Apache projects (such as Camel), I propose to create
serviceMix Extra.
ServiceMix Extra could host contributions which are not Apache license
compliant.
WDYT ?
If you are all ok, I will create it.
On the other hand, now that ServiceMix 4.3.0 has been released, I'm
worki
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the report :)
Regards
JB
On 03/14/2011 11:14 PM, Chris Custine wrote:
I have updated the board report with the branding compliance checklist
and the suggested comments on web site and documentation and it has
been submitted. I cut it a little close on the timeline due to
Thx
I plan to start the SMX 4.4.0 preparation this afternoon (Gert has
already started).
Regards
JB
On 03/28/2011 11:41 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+4.4.0
Charles
Hi,
This release will be the LAST ServiceMix 3 release. ServiceMix 3 will
set as deprecated just after this release.
It contains mainly bug fixes and dependencies update, especially:
- ServiceMix Utils 1.4.0
- ServiceMix Specs 1.7.0
- ServiceMix Components 2011.01
- Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE
- Came
Hi all,
The CXF team has made a lot of improvements around OSGi and especially
Blueprint.
They plan to release CXF 2.4.0 soon (in the following weeks).
I think it could have sense to use CXF 2.4.0 for ServiceMix 4.4.0.
It means that ServiceMix 4.4.0 will ship:
- Karaf 2.2.0 (maybe 2.2.1 at l
Hi,
As already discussed :), your issue is relative to Camel.
I'm preparing a test case to try to reproduce the issue and check if
it's already present on 4.4-SNAPSHOT.
Regards
JB
On 04/03/2011 08:26 PM, geaaru wrote:
Hi at all,
I'm not a smx developer, but an user and I hope that my comme
oint in pruning bits from it for the final release we're doing.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Hi,
This release will be the
he SMX4-782 JIRA issue (I assume that's the one that Daniele is
referring to) as well to ensure the entire team can follow along
there?
Thanks,
Gert Vanthienen
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:59 P
Hi all,
I'm rollbacking the ServiceMix 3.4 release.
I also raised SM-2066 to build the issue on the lightweight component.
I'm gonna work on it.
Regards
JB
On 03/30/2011 12:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
This release will be the LAST ServiceMix 3 release. ServiceMix 3 w
Hi Gert,
I saw this week end that now features use the NMR POM.
I'm fully agree as it's helpful to align the dependencies between our
projects (components, NMR, features, etc).
If you need help around that, don't hesitate to ping me :)
Regards
JB
On 04/04/2011 09:34 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrot
h of these releases.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Gert,
Yes, Camel should be "aligned" to use CXF 2.4.0.
For now, I'
mp" this thread because its been quite a while since Jean
Baptiste proposed "servicemix-extra" and no action has been taken.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
+1
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Hi all,
as others Apache projects
.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Awesome, thanks a ton Gert :)
I'm gonna help around that also :)
Regards
JB
On 04/04/2011 09:43 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
Jean-Baptiste,
Rather than committing ourselves to 2 releases close to each othe
Hi all,
in preparation of a whole bundles release (to take care of bundle.info
addition), I submit the Bundles POM 6 to your vote.
I also submit OpenSAML 2.4.1_1 to your vote. This bundle is required by
the CXF team to be able to release CXF 2.4.0 with full OSGi support
around OpenSAML.
St
Here's my +1 also.
Regards
JB
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
in preparation of a whole bundles release (to take care of bundle.info
addition), I submit the Bundles POM 6 to your vote.
I also submit OpenSAML 2.4.1_1 to your vote. This bundle is required by
th
Hi all,
the vote has passed with:
+1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Johan Edstrom, Freeman Fang, Ulhas Bhole,
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding): Andreas Pieber
No other vote.
The artifacts have been promoted on the central repo.
Thanks for your vote.
Regards
JB
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Jean
Hi all,
I submit to your vote a complete ServiceMix Bundles release.
This release includes:
- all bundles embedding the OSGI-INF/bundle.info file which provide deeper
information in Karaf using osgi:info command
- new bundles such as:
antlr-runtime-3.2
commons-dbcp-1.4
javassist-3.12.GA
:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I'm rollbacking the ServiceMix 3.4 release.
I also raised SM-2066 to build the issue on the lightweight component. I'm
gonna work on it.
Regards
JB
On 03/30/2011 12:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
This release will be the LAST Se
arles Moulliard wrote:
I don't see the two new bundles that I create for Struts 2 in this
release. Are they planned for a next release ?
On 26/04/11 09:56, Freeman Fang wrote:
+1
Thanks
Freeman
On 2011-4-19, at 下午7:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I submit to your vote a complete ServiceM
Here's my +1 also.
Regards
JB
On 04/19/2011 01:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I submit to your vote a complete ServiceMix Bundles release.
This release includes:
- all bundles embedding the OSGI-INF/bundle.info file which provide deeper
information in Karaf using osgi
Hi,
the vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Ioannis Canellos, Guillaume Nodet, Daniel Kulp, Gert
Vanthienen, Freeman Fang, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The artifacts have been promoted to the central maven repo.
Thanks a lot for your vote.
Regards
JB
On 04/19/2011 01:46 PM
Hi all,
I fixed the last issues around samples and WSN2005 component this morning.
I'm quite ready to cut off the ServiceMix 3.4 release but I have an issue.
In order to be able to run examples/basic example, I had to update the
JBI maven plugin with a new ServiceMix version (only the SLF4J
de
Nevermind guy.
With the help of Gert, I've broken the cyclic dependency :)
Regards
JB
On 05/04/2011 12:25 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I fixed the last issues around samples and WSN2005 component this morning.
I'm quite ready to cut off the ServiceMix 3.4 release but
Hi,
In preparation for the next ServiceMix 3.4 release, I submit the 4.5
release of JBI Maven Plugin to your vote.
We solved 3 issues in this release:
Bug
[SM-2008] - jbi maven plugin: service assembly & attached artifact
[SM-2080] - Add SLF4J dependency in jbi-maven-plugin as required for
Here's my +1
Regards
JB
On 05/04/2011 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
In preparation for the next ServiceMix 3.4 release, I submit the 4.5
release of JBI Maven Plugin to your vote.
We solved 3 issues in this release:
Bug
[SM-2008] - jbi maven plugin: service assembly &
Hi all,
the vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Freeman Fang, Ioannis Canellos, Uhlas Bhole, Guillaume
Nodet, Gert Vanthienen, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non-binding): Jon Anstey, Andreas Pieber
The artifacts have been promoted on the maven central repo.
I update the Jira
+1
Regards
JB
On 05/19/2011 06:57 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi,
I've uploaded a release for ServiceMix Specs 1.8.0 to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-026/
An overview of issues fixed in this release can be found at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Rel
Hi all,
I'm working on SMX4-823 (regarding Jetty bundles).
Just after, I plan to cut off a ServiceMix Bundles tonight.
This release will include:
- freemarker 2.3.16
- java-apns-0.1.6
- mybatis-3.0.4
- struts2-2.2.1.1
- struts2-xwork-2.2.1.1
- cometd-java-server-2.1.1
- ehcache-2.3.0
- wsdl4j-1.
Thanks for the update Fernando.
I will include it for the release.
Regards
JB
On 05/19/2011 03:46 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
FreeMarker has just been updated again to 2.3.17, you might want to include
that version instead. Thanks.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofréwrote:
It's already included. I forgot to mention.
Regards
JB
On 05/19/2011 03:51 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Thanks for the update Fernando.
I will include it for the release.
Regards
JB
On 05/19/2011 03:46 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
FreeMarker has just been updated again to 2.3.17
I second Willem. Fremarker 2.3.17 will be included in the SMX Bundles
release.
Thanks a bunch Willem.
Regards
JB
On 05/19/2011 04:02 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi
I committed the patch of FreeMarker 2.3.17 bundle today and also updated
the bundle pom.xml.
So this release should include FreeMar
Hi,
I submit to your vote the following ServiceMix Bundles releases:
- bcprov-jdk15 1.46_1
- bcprov-jdk16 1.46_1
- cometd-java-server 2.1.1_1
- derbynet 10.7.1.1_1
- derbynet 10.8.1.2_1
- ehcache 2.3.0_3
- freemarker 2.3.16_1
- freemarker 2.3.17_1
- java-apns 0.16_1
- java-xmlbuilder 0.3_1
- jav
Hi all,
I think that it's time to prepare new ServiceMix releases:
- ServiceMix 3.4 using ServiceMix Components 2011.02, CXF 2.4.0, Camel
2.7.1, ActiveMQ 5.5.0, Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE, ServiceMix Utils 1.5.0
- ServiceMix 4.4 using Karaf 2.2.1, ServiceMix Components 2011.02,
ServiceMix Specs 1.8.0
it in fully synchronous + update camel nmr
doc (testing, ...). I will raise a ticket and work on that tomorrow
and thursday.
Is it ok for you ?
Regards,
Charles
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I think that it's time to prepare new ServiceMix releases:
-
Camel 2.8-SNAPSHOT.
On 5/24/11 3:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I think that it's time to prepare new ServiceMix releases:
- ServiceMix 3.4 using ServiceMix Components 2011.02, CXF 2.4.0, Camel
2.7.1, ActiveMQ 5.5.0, Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE, ServiceMix Utils 1.5.0
- ServiceMix 4.4 us
ed to provide a clear and strong message to Apache, IT
communities that ServiceMix is not death, will be there for a long
time ago and continues to innovate .
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I think that it's time to prepare new ServiceMi
to use CXF 2.3.3.
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 05/24/2011 10:50 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi,
Camel 2.7.1 doesn't support CXF 2.4.0, you may need to wait for the
Camel 2.8.0 release.
BTW, current ServiceMix is using Camel 2.8-SNAPSHOT.
On 5/24/11 3:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I
http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
We have an issue in ServiceMix Components 2011.02-SNAPSHOT.
Currently, components use Camel 2.7.1 and CXF 2.4.0, where we can have issue
as in ServiceMix 4, both CXF 2.3.3 (required by Camel 2.7.1) and CXF
be a valid solution release a minor release 4.3.1 with bug fix
about blueprint camel-jbi component and other bug fix?
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 08:30 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
It sounds good to me.
It just means that we have to wait for Camel 2.8.0. It gives us time to
work on the document
Here's my +1
Regards
JB
On 05/22/2011 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
I submit to your vote the following ServiceMix Bundles releases:
- bcprov-jdk15 1.46_1
- bcprov-jdk16 1.46_1
- cometd-java-server 2.1.1_1
- derbynet 10.7.1.1_1
- derbynet 10.8.1.2_1
- ehcache 2.3.0_3
- freem
Hi all,
the vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Ioannis Canellos, Charles Moulliard, Freeman Fang,
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non-binding): Johan Edstrom, Fernando Ribeiro
I have promoted the artifacts to the central repo.
Thanks all for your vote.
Regards
JB
On 05/22
Hi all,
FYI, I fixed KARAF-651.
Now, the features-maven-plugin (and karaf-maven-plugin on Karaf
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT) now embeds by default the Karaf standard and enterprise
features descriptors.
It means that it's no more required to add:
mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.features/standard/x.x.x/x
Hi all,
I submit the following ServiceMix Bundles to your vote:
- freemarker 2.3.18
- xmlsec 1.4.5
- gae-1.4.3
- gdata-1.41.1
- guava-09
- fop-1.0
- batik-1.7
- xmlgraphics-commons-1.4
- dbunit-2.2
- japex-1.2.3
- hadoop-core-0.20.203.0
- velocity-1.7
- velocity-1.6.2
- velocity-1.6.4
- avalon-f
Here's my +1
Regards
JB
On 06/03/2011 11:14 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I submit the following ServiceMix Bundles to your vote:
- freemarker 2.3.18
- xmlsec 1.4.5
- gae-1.4.3
- gdata-1.41.1
- guava-09
- fop-1.0
- batik-1.7
- xmlgraphics-commons-1.4
- dbunit-2.2
- japex-
Hi,
The ServiceMix Bundles release vote has passed with the following results:
+1 (binding): Daniel Kulp, Guillaume Nodet, Gert Vanthienen, Johan
Edstrom, Ioannis Canellos, Freeman Fang, Willem Jiang, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The artifacts have been promoted to the central maven repo.
Thanks
Hi Jie,
you have an example of custom interceptor (for both endpoint and
exchange), in the ServiceMix NMR module:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/nmr/trunk/examples/interceptors/
With that you can implement interceptor for auditing or whatever you want.
regards
JB
On 06/09/2
Hi Atit,
thanks for the update. I will make a try on 2011.01 components and I
will reopen the Jira if the issue is still there.
Regards
JB
On 06/13/2011 10:49 AM, Atit wrote:
Hi,
SMXCOMP-594 refers to the defect where ServiceMix is "Unable to acquire lock
on " a file during file pollin
s also not the case. Still it works
well there. The way to couple the documentation to releases is to note
for example which attribute of a command has been introduced in which
version. This is niot perfect but works quite well in practice.
Christian
Am 17.06.2011 09:46, schrieb Jean-Baptiste On
Hi Willem,
FYI, it's already possible (I do it ;)), for instance:
git svn init --prefix=origin/ --trunk=trunk --branches=branches
--tags=tags https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/components
git svn fetch --log-window-size=1
Regards
JB
On 06/21/2011 03:21 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
+
Hi Atit,
not yet but it's in my TODO list.
Regards
JB
On 06/21/2011 05:46 PM, Atit wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if you guys have been able to work on this and identify the
issue. Is there anything i can help you with?
regards
Atit
--
View this message in context:
http://servicemix.396122
Hi Josn,
the target endpoint is provided in the xbean. It's injected in the
abstract class and populated in the exchange.
Regards
JB
On 06/22/2011 04:42 PM, josn wrote:
Hi ,
I read the source code of serviemix-smpp-2010.01 binding component. here is
some snippet of class SmppConsumerEndpoin
22, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Josn,
the target endpoint is provided in the xbean. It's injected in the abstract
class and populated in the exchange.
Regards
JB
On 06/22/2011 04:42 PM, josn wrote:
Hi ,
I read the source code of serviemix-smpp-2010.01 binding compon
Let me take a look in the code :)
Regards
JB
On 06/22/2011 05:06 PM, josn wrote:
Thanks JB,
What I want to know is how populated in the exchange.
Ragards,
I like the splatch website design also.
As we discussed for Karaf, moving the SMX website to use scalate
requires that we have a "nightly" deployment of the website to quickly
update the news section, etc.
Regards
JB
On 06/29/2011 09:33 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
If we do the same as Karaf,
Hi Geert,
I don't think it's a good idea to remove the Spring support in SMX5 as
it's fully supported by Camel.
If an user want to deploy Camel routes defined using Spring DSL, it should.
Of course, we can focus the documentation about the blueprint usage (I
think it's a good idea), but the S
Thanks a bunch,
I saw the svn commit.
Regards
JB
On 06/29/2011 03:11 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've just create a svn repository
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx5/trunk
and a JIRA for a git mirror
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3736
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at
I'm agree with Guillaume.
It's clear that Karaf is the premium container and most of the people
will certainly use it.
But there are some people which have:
1/ existing IT policies and hardware. For instance, in financial
companies, they have some kind of "print" to use only this kind of
app
Hi Guillaume,
thanks for the update.
Regards
JB
On 06/30/2011 08:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The svn area is available at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx5/trunk
To use the git mirror (using git-svn), you can use the following instructions:
git clone git://git.apache.
FYI, I'm gonna start/update a wiki page describing our current shared
"vision" about ServiceMix 5.
Gert and I were quite busy the last days, but we try to keep in touch to
work together on documentation and website.
Regards
JB
On 06/30/2011 08:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The svn area is a
(http://servicemix.apache.org/roadmap.html) and input from discussions
of this week.
Another point that we should also discuss concerns Apollo and
ActiveMQ. SMX supports ActiveMq + Tx manager but I think that
gradually we must also prepare SMX to use Apollo.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Bap
Hi all,
I'm not agree with that, and I don't think that it's the Guillaume's
point of view.
The idea speaking about Tomcat is not to create ServiceCat or something
like that. If the purpose was this one, Karaf + Jetty already does the
stuff.
The idea is more to provide:
- ServiceMix as a s
It depends of what we are talking about.
I'm not sure that scala-based version of SMX (if we are talking about
SMX core code) is good thing.
However, be able to use Scala for SMX deployable artifacts or as a DSL
could be very interesting.
Regards
JB
On 07/01/2011 04:59 PM, Michael Van wrot
Hi all,
If you want to participate to the next ApacheCon and you want to request
travel assistance, you have to send your request before Friday 8th July.
Financial assistance is available for Travel (planes, trains, whatever)
, Accomodation (at the conference venue hotel) and Conference entra
I forgot: for more information, take a look on
http://www.apache.org/travel/
Regards
JB
On 07/03/2011 11:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
If you want to participate to the next ApacheCon and you want to request
travel assistance, you have to send your request before Friday 8th July
1 - 100 of 1686 matches
Mail list logo
