http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Summary: Incorrect localization information when using log4j
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: https://www.qos.ch/shop/products/log4j/log4j-Manual.jsp
OS/Version: All
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-04 15:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=2)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=2action=view)
complete build.xml
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Summary: jcl104-over-slf4j.jar jcl104-over-slf4j-1.0-rc2.jar
(ibiblio/maven) incomplete
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-08 00:30 ---
Thanks for the heads up. Fixed in SLF4J-1.0RC3.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-22 14:29 ---
To avoid this kind of problems, you may want to try the
check-case-insensitive.py script at
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/contrib/hook-scripts/
When a file is
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-23 13:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=4)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=4action=view)
Patch for JDK14LoggerFactory to support native implementations.
Please check
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
Summary: Exceptionhandler Design of MessageFormatter
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.0beta9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
Summary: NullPointerException in SLF4JLog.java (jcl104-over-
slf4j.jar)
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|Windows XP |All
--- Additional Comments From
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 17:21 ---
Hello Boris,
Thank you for your valuable input to this report.
Based on http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174, it seems that
you
advocate an
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
Summary: JDK14LoggerAdapter does not preserve source class name
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3
Status: NEW
Severity: major
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-12 21:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=5)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=5action=view)
Patch to preserve logger with jdk14
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-27 11:20 ---
Looking at the source code for Logger, LogRecord and various formatter
in JDK 1.5, it appears that caller information is inferred when not
supplied by the user. More
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-27 16:16 ---
I'm willing to re-work the patch so that a subclass of LogRecord is used that
only infers when necessary, if
desired. Otherwise, I think this will only lead towards JULI
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
Summary: Minor improvement to JARs within Build
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.0rc1
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P4
Component:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-04 15:43 ---
Reworking the patch is one option. However, there might be a simpler path. For
vanilla JULI users, the caller information is inferred anyhow. So there would
be no
gain
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-04 20:39 ---
For the x4juli case, if Boris is willing, x4juli could have its own
implementation
of JDK14LoggerAdapter where the caller is not automatically inferred.
There was
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 14:44 ---
Although I am happy about your +0 vote as it clears an obstacle, I
would like to make sure that the pros and cons of the issue are
properly understood by everyone so that
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 15:31 ---
Thanks for the pointer. I had somehow forgotten that X4JuliLogger
class implements org.slf4j.Logger. It is clearer now.
The patch will be applied in the near future.
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
Summary: SLF4JLog 'logger' field nulled by Tomcat 5.5.15
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 06:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=7)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=7action=view)
WebappClassLoader.java from Tomcat 5.5.15 source
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 06:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=8)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=8action=view)
Hacked SLF4JLog.java to work around the issue.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
Summary: nlog4j compile fails with jdk1.5
Product: NLOG4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17
Summary: Update to NewVsSetLen
Product: NLOG4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 15:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=9)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=9action=view)
javadoc patch wrt. sun jdk 1.5.0 test
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 15:28 ---
Hello Jens,
Thanks for the report. If it is not too much trouble, can you reproduce the
table in
text form here? Otherwise, I will apply your patch to see the results.
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18
Summary: javadoc - example files not coppied
Product: NLOG4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 17:06 ---
Hello, and thanks for the quick response!
Sure enough, Tomcat does limit its thrashing to fields that are static AND
final. Good catch. I totally missed that.
I will
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 19:49 ---
Considering that SLF4J does not keep track of class loaders, our
reaction to invoking release(ClassLoader) by Tomcat would necessarily
involve checking all SLF4JLog
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 21:41 ---
I have reported the bug on Tomcat Bugzilla. We'll see what they have to say
about it.
I did think of another possible fix on SLF4J's end, but I'm not sure how
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 21:58 ---
Thank you very much for filing a report with Tomcat.
As for your suggestion about moving the level of references one level down,
there
are two points that should be
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-17 17:32 ---
Good deal. The fix went where it belonged (in Tomcat as opposed to SLF4J.)
It's still a bit ugly, but this should significantly reduce the probability of
unwanted side
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-19 16:08 ---
I am using SLF4J in an open source project (QuickFIX/J --
www.quickfixengine.org). QuickFIX/J is a library itself and the end users will
select which logging engine they
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
Summary: JDK 1.4 logger adapter drops support logger name
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-19 17:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=10)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=10action=view)
Unit test to demonstrate issue.
This test suite has 2 unit tests. It shows
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-20 09:19 ---
Hello Ceki, hello Steve,
(In reply to comment #16)
The solution currently in SLF4J can be found in JCL and other places. As far
as
I am
aware, the question of
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-20 12:35 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
The solution currently in SLF4J can be found in JCL and other places. As far
as I am aware, the question of performance is rarely if ever
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21
Summary: NLog4J Maven dependency
Product: NLOG4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22
Summary: jcl104-over-slf4j throws exception on release()
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 11:50 ---
Ceki,
My setup is a default Tomcat installation, except that xercesImpl.jar
is placed in common/lib (this shouldn't affect anything). The only
logging jars I can identify
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 12:30 ---
Update:
I removed META-INF/services/org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
from jcl104-over-slf4j.jar, and then the problem disappeared.
SLF4FLogFactory.release() is not
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-13 13:47 ---
Yes, undeploy works now, and a warning message is logged.
Many thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23
Summary: bogus jcl-over-slf4j impl - %F, %L etc. off by one
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.0rc1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24
Summary: Log4J Conversion Parameters
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Summary: document, how to configure the logging
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
show_bug.cgi?id=30
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 21:38 ---
testing please ignore
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
show_bug.cgi?id=35
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10
show_bug.cgi?id=36
Summary: Date of 1.2 release posted wron on web site News page
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://www.slf4j.org/news.html
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
show_bug.cgi?id=36
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-29 12:18 ---
Hello Dov,
Thanks for the report, I've corrected the date :)
Sébastien
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the
show_bug.cgi?id=36
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
show_bug.cgi?id=36
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
show_bug.cgi?id=37
Summary: please compile using java 1.3
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: Core API
show_bug.cgi?id=35
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-29 23:03 ---
Sebastian,
Would it be acceptable if instead of adding a new method to ILoggerFactory
(e.g. getRootLogger()), the currently existing method, namely
getLogger(String), was modified to return the root logger
show_bug.cgi?id=35
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-30 01:19 ---
Between , root, and ROOT my preference is a public constant named
ROOT_LOGGER or ROOT_NAME with the value .
This would be compatible w/ java.util.logging, x4juli and Log4J.
Implementors of
show_bug.cgi?id=37
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-30 10:01 ---
Works for me.
thanks !
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
show_bug.cgi?id=35
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-30 22:48 ---
Fine with me.
The constant will be in which class?
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching
show_bug.cgi?id=35
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-31 15:17 ---
OK. Great.
As for the ROOT_NAME constant, it could be placed in the org.slf4j.Logger
interface. Since this interface is shared by all SLF4J bindings, the same
constant would apply everywhere.
As an
show_bug.cgi?id=38
Summary: JUL bridge/router
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Implementations
AssignedTo:
show_bug.cgi?id=23
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-09 22:50 ---
I just committed a fix for this bug. After its tested, it should be included in
SLF4J version 1.3.
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
show_bug.cgi?id=23
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
show_bug.cgi?id=35
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
show_bug.cgi?id=42
Summary: 1.3.0 contains breaking API changes
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: Core API
show_bug.cgi?id=42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |major
Platform|Macintosh |All
--
show_bug.cgi?id=35
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-03 21:06 ---
Ooops. Fixed in SVN.
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
show_bug.cgi?id=41
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-03
show_bug.cgi?id=42
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
show_bug.cgi?id=23
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||44
nThis||
--
show_bug.cgi?id=44
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||INVALID
show_bug.cgi?id=46
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
show_bug.cgi?id=39
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
show_bug.cgi?id=31
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution||REMIND
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
Summary: Add MDC (mapped diagnostic context) to SLF4J
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P4
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-29 07:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=12)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=12action=view)
example scrambled log outputput (2 threads/no delay/dual core machine)
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-29 07:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=13)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=13action=view)
test program + config
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-29 17:14 ---
I don't see the possibility to vote for this issue :(
But this certainly gets +1 from me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53
Summary: slf4j-log4j12 version 1.4.0: trace logs in DEBUG level
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54
Summary: Typo in When should SLF4J be used FAQ documentation
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
Summary: Typo in Where can I get a particular SLF4J binding FAQ
documentation
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56
Summary: Typo in What is the fastest way of (not) logging? FAQ
documentation
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 09:08 ---
Thanks for the report. Unless something unexpected comes up, I'll add MDC
support for the next release of SLF4J. Incidentally, this should enable
log4j-bridge to be placed in
1 - 100 of 581 matches
Mail list logo
