[Bug 6780] Existing but empty From: and To:

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6780 Giovanni Bechis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giova...@paclan.it

[Bug 7080] Enhancement: Extend Uribl.pm to do SOA Email addressess lookups against white/black lists

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7080 Giovanni Bechis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: svn commit: r1858693 - /spamassassin/trunk/build/mkupdates/listpromotable

+1 Good idea On 5/5/2019 10:34 AM, gbec...@apache.org wrote: > Author: gbechis > Date: Sun May 5 14:34:24 2019 > New Revision: 1858693 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1858693=rev > Log: > be clear that active.list should not be hand-edited > > Modified: >

Re: /tags nightly commits

Resending with correct dev list :-) On 5/5/2019 6:10 AM, Paul Stead wrote: > Promotions and tags still seem to be a little problematic at the moment. A > run of build/mkupdates/listpromotable locally shows +300 lines difference > to active.list over the one being submitted. Before I deal with

[Bug 7559] DKIM default minimum key size should be 1024 bits

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7559 RW changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwmailli...@googlemail.com --- Comment #3

[Bug 7643] False positive DATE_IN_FUTURE

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7643 Giovanni Bechis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giova...@paclan.it

[Bug 7267] no way to set SSL_VERIFY_PEER in spamd

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7267 Giovanni Bechis changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5588|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 7184] Spamd running with ssl and spamc called without ssl causes a cryptic method error and crashes the child

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7184 Giovanni Bechis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 7086] check_uri_local_bl fails to block text/plain messages with blacklisted URLs

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7086 Giovanni Bechis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 7559] DKIM default minimum key size should be 1024 bits

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7559 --- Comment #5 from RW --- (In reply to Bill Cole from comment #4) Verifier policies may use the >length of the signing key as one metric for determining whether a >signature is acceptable. Which is controlled in the DKIM plugin

[Bug 7559] DKIM default minimum key size should be 1024 bits

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7559 Bill Cole changed: What|Removed |Added CC||billc...@apache.org --- Comment #4