[Bug 4316] spamd loops spawning children that die immediately.

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4316 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-09 01:29 --- Subject: Re: spamd loops spawning children that die immediately. I suppose I could get shot for asking this, but given the syslog issue, is there any support

[Bug 4260] rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-09 01:52 --- aren't we already dropping the bogus packets immediately? Those are just the ones that we can tell are bogus because it is, e.g., a reply to a query for a

[Bug 3714] New ruleset to catch penny stock advisories

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-09 06:57 --- Created an attachment (id=2858) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2858action=view) Raw ruleset (not usable with normal SA) This is the raw

[Bug 4176] [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4260] rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-09 08:58 --- Instead of $host, why not use question-data ? It's easy to get to and much more thorough. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug 4176] [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-09 09:21 --- Subject: Re: [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:40:22AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: redirector_pattern

[Bug 4260] rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-09 10:03 --- It's not possible to encode the difference between a final . and no final . in a question section, so that's not an issue. The only other issue would be

[Bug 4301] MSN Groups mails are reported as spam

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4301 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4144] FORGED_IMS_HTML and FORGED_IMS_TAGS false-positive.

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4144 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-09 14:57 --- Ajay can you please attach a *complete* message, including all of the received headers? --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

[Bug 3615] RFE: trust_env_sender_networks parameter

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3615 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4301] MSN Groups mails are reported as spam

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4301 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[Bug 4168] FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 FPs with MSN Groups messages

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3742] New: previous fix for umask causes potential untie() issues

2004-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 Summary: previous fix for umask causes potential untie() issues Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW

[Bug 3740] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-01 19:37 --- Subject: Re: yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin d) failure to properly attach a sample will result in closing of the bug as WONTFIX Actually, it's

[Bug 3740] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-01 21:27 --- I read your comments enough to form a hypotheses ofthe problem and a solution. You say that all the information is in what you pasted in the various comments. I

[Bug 3744] New: db format conversion not working

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 Summary: db format conversion not working Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Sun OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major

[Bug 3744] db format conversion not working

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3744] db format conversion not working

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 13:31 --- Created an attachment (id=2302) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2302action=view) sa-learn debug output The test session with the sa-learn

[Bug 3742] [review] previous fix for umask causes potential untie() issues

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 13:50 --- FYI: I was able to reproduce the behavior trying to upgrade from my previous v2 DB to a v3 DB, although the upgrade does complete: untie attempted while 1

[Bug 3742] [review] previous fix for umask causes potential untie() issues

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 13:55 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3742] [review] previous fix for umask causes potential untie() issues

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 13:59 --- Subject: Re: [review] previous fix for umask causes potential untie() issues +1 Michael --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug 3743] Spamd not cleaning up defunct processes

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 16:10 --- hrm. it seems like for some reason either 1) the OS isn't sending a SIGCHLD when the child exits, so the parent doesn't know to wait for it and spawn a new

[Bug 3745] no SPEWS testing in the headers tests

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3745 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 16:11 --- worth noting that SPEWS is currently listing our mailing lists, too. ;) --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug,

[Bug 3745] no SPEWS testing in the headers tests

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3745 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 16:57 --- That's fair comment - I logged it on behalf of someone else, figured there is no harm in asking. Personally I find SPEWS good for scoring towards spam, but not

[Bug 3743] Spamd not cleaning up defunct processes

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 18:16 --- Subject: Re: Spamd not cleaning up defunct processes On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 05:53:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We suspect the problem has to do with a

[Bug 3743] Spamd not cleaning up defunct processes

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 18:43 --- Just as an FYI, we can see the changes in action in the following log extract; the spamd parent detected just a single SIGCHLD but the waitpid call cleaned up 4

[Bug 2978] patch to add support for fuzzy matching

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 19:57 --- Created an attachment (id=2303) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2303action=view) Scott Crosby's edit-distance script here's another

[Bug 3625] sysklogd rpm install stopped spamd processing

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 20:02 --- FWIW, I can't reproduce this with perl 5.6.1 alone -- I think it's a syslogd or libc issue. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

[Bug 3625] sysklogd rpm install stopped spamd processing

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 21:55 --- Created an attachment (id=2304) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2304action=view) possible fix could you try this patch? I can't

[Bug 3740] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Future |3.0.0 --- Additional

[Bug 3743] Spamd not cleaning up defunct processes

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Future |3.0.0 --- Additional

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 09:08 --- So, there are a couple of vetos on this, anyone want to change their position? If we want to do it I kinda like a new _PADSCORE_ or whatever it should be called

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 09:34 --- Subject: Re: Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting If we want to do it I kinda like a new _PADSCORE_ or whatever it should be called that

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 10:41 --- 3.0.0 milestone - needs to be decided now if we're going to change this As an outside viewpoint, I'm in favor of one character (either zero or space) of padding

[Bug 3746] New: README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 Summary: README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Sun OS/Version: other Status: NEW

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 10:58 --- Subject: Re: Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _PAD0SCORE_ and _PAD00SCORE_ makes sense to

[Bug 3746] README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 11:26 --- Subject: Re: New: README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:58:46AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is for 3.0.0-rc2.

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 11:32 --- Subject: Re: Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:03:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thinking about this, 2.6x

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 11:46 --- Subject: Re: Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:44:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about something like:

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 11:47 --- Subject: Re: Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting I still like my suggestion of something like _PADSCORE( )_ or _PADSCORE(0)_, BTW. I'd

[Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 12:01 --- Subject: Re: Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, I can go with _SCORE(x)_ where x = , 0,

[Bug 3746] README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 13:04 --- I see by greping around that local_rules_dir is set to /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin at make time (at least on Solaris). I don't find any man pages anywhere.

[Bug 3746] README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 13:15 --- I am sure that man spamassassin would tell me about it if I could find the man pages. They seem to be well hidden or missing or I am blind (quite possible).

[Bug 3625] [review] sysklogd rpm install stopped spamd processing

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|sysklogd rpm install stopped|[review] sysklogd rpm

[Bug 3747] New: make test fails on spamc_l

2004-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747 Summary: make test fails on spamc_l Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor

[Bug 3746] README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 18:46 --- Looking more closely at the README file, I see that it says to look at the first few lines of spamassassin or spamd to see the values of the __*__ variables. So

[Bug 3746] README does not mention /etc/opt/mail/spamassassin

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 18:59 --- the manpages are whereever perl was configured to put them -- which is set at perl build time... SA doesn't control that at all. --- You are receiving

[Bug 3698] [review] Dead function decode_mime_bit in PerMsgStatus.pm

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3698 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3238] [review] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 19:18 --- +1 seems good --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 3748] mass-check hangs

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3748 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-04 13:15 --- Yes. Ensured that only distribution rules were in the /rules/ directory. Placed this corpus file into /masses/. Used the command perl ./mass-check

[Bug 3748] mass-check hangs

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3748 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org

[Bug 3749] New: message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 Summary: message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW

[Bug 3749] message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-04 14:13 --- Created an attachment (id=2314) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2314action=view) sample mail I don't remember if the text/plain part is

[Bug 3748] [review] mass-check hangs

2004-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3748 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-04 15:45 --- Just an FYI: confirmed, the patch fixes the problem here. Thanks. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

[Bug 3750] decode_attachments not used

2004-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-04 16:00 --- Subject: Re: decode_attachments not used On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 03:45:09PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just had another think. What I need is to be able

[Bug 2947] RFE: Test to catch invalid HTML Obfuscation

2004-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-04 20:11 --- Created an attachment (id=2316) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2316action=view) Proposed obfuscating HTML tag rule Rule just refined for

[Bug 3748] [review] mass-check hangs

2004-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3748 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3675] [review] pick a project logo

2004-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3675 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-04 23:56 --- Subject: Re: [review] pick a project logo 1 - Color scheme - Hot (4.x) 2 - Line thickness - Fatter (1.x) ;) Look at the bottom: thickness 4.3d/4.4d,

[Bug 3750] decode_attachments not used

2004-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3749] message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[review] message parser |message parser skips

[Bug 3751] New: content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 Summary: content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other

[Bug 3751] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Future |3.0.0 --- You are

[Bug 3751] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 17:09 --- Created an attachment (id=2318) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2318action=view) suggested patch this patch adds in optional whitespace

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|content-type header parsing |[review] content-type header

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 17:58 --- just to note, at least mutt and Outlook Express parse the malformed boundary out. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list

[Bug 3749] message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2315 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3749] [review] message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|message parser skips|[review] message parser

[Bug 3675] [review] pick a project logo

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3675 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 18:19 --- 1 - Colour Scheme: Hot. Definitely. Although, I would prefer 4.0 to 4.3 -- I like the different colour messages. It also makes us look better -- we can determine

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2318 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 21:10 --- +1 so far I don't see any issues with the patch, except that t/mimeparse checks t/data/spam/badmime2.txt, which is a spam with a blank boundary. If we actively

[Bug 3752] New: MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 Summary: MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.64 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 3752] MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 05:43 --- Created an attachment (id=2321) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2321action=view) Fixes regex in _check_attachments() of EvalTests.pm

[Bug 3752] MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3752] MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule does not flag recent virus

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||3010 --- You are

[Bug 3010] Implement base anti-worm plugin ...

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||3752 nThis|

[Bug 3753] New: -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 Summary: -H should have long name Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

[Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |trivial Target Milestone|Future

[Bug 3754] New: sa-learn: successful return code though file not found

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3754 Summary: sa-learn: successful return code though file not found Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

[Bug 3755] New: Add configuration setting: use_language

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3755 Summary: Add configuration setting: use_language Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 11:18 --- Ah, I see. It was missing in the SYNOPSIS. Added in r43421. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

[Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 11:28 --- Subject: Re: -H should have long name Ah, I see. It was missing in the SYNOPSIS. Added in r43421. Argh... I was just preparing a patch. :-) --- You

[Bug 3753] -H should have long name

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 12:00 --- Sorry, I didn't even see that it was you who filed/forwarded the bug -- I just knew that there's already such a long name because I always thought the name

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 18:01 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3555] Several False Positive Rules on Same Message

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3555 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3756] New: Misplaced close-angle-brackets in PoD doc

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3756 Summary: Misplaced close-angle-brackets in PoD doc Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity:

[Bug 3756] Misplaced close-angle-brackets in PoD doc

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3756 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 21:29 --- Subject: Re: Misplaced close-angle-brackets in PoD doc On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 09:25:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone want to do up a patch? It's

[Bug 3756] Misplaced close-angle-brackets in PoD doc

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3756 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-06 21:39 --- Subject: Re: Misplaced close-angle-brackets in PoD doc It's documentation, just check in the fixed version. ;) *sigh* That was *supposed* to be a subtle hint

[Bug 3649] pyzor check timed out after 10 secs (Bad file descriptor)

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 13:26 --- Just to keep the status current, tested with 3.0.0-rc3 and pyzor still times out. I understand that this may not be resolved until the SA 3.1.0 release, but I

[Bug 3649] pyzor check timed out after 10 secs (Bad file descriptor)

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 13:35 --- Subject: Re: pyzor check timed out after 10 secs (Bad file descriptor) Data Point: No pyzor timeout problems here with RC3, in fact I've been running some

[Bug 3755] Add configuration setting: use_language

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3755 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 13:47 --- I am planing to implement this. I would like your input on the following idea: - Add use_language as a $CONF_TYPE_STRING configuration setting with default

[Bug 3649] pyzor check timed out after 10 secs (Bad file descriptor)

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 14:02 --- Exchaged several e-mail with Justin Mason a few weeks ago, and have not heard that the issue has been resolved. Got from bugzilla this on 8/27:

[Bug 3649] pyzor check timed out after 10 secs (Bad file descriptor)

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 14:15 --- IIRC I was still waiting for the specific error message that pyzor outputs on fd 2. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee

[Bug 3649] pyzor check timed out after 10 secs (Bad file descriptor)

2004-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 14:38 --- Justin, here is the text of our last e-mail exchange on this: - Original Message - From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP

[Bug 3740] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 17:41 --- nah, we don't need to patch the code for this; a def_whitelist_from_rcvd entry fixes it: pts rule name description --

[Bug 3740] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 17:42 --- Created an attachment (id=2323) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2323action=view) add a whitelist for Yahoo MAILER-DAEMON messages

[Bug 3740] [review] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|yahoo bounce are filtered |[review] yahoo bounce are

[Bug 3740] [review] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 18:12 --- Would we want to whitelist bounces from Yahoo? That would provide a -15 point bonus for any mail sent via a forged From address and a bounce through yahoo. And it

[Bug 3751] [review] content-type header parsing doesn't catch malformed boundaries

2004-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2320 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3740] [review] yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin

2004-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 19:45 --- Subject: Re: yahoo bounce are filtered out by spamassassin +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

[Bug 3749] [review] message parser skips blank/invalid(?) parts

2004-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >