[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786

Bill Cole  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 CC||sa-bugz-20080315@billmail.s
   ||cconsult.com
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Bill Cole  ---
The ruleset and its scoring has evolved away from this being anything like a
problem, much less a bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786

Giovanni Bechis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||giova...@paclan.it

--- Comment #5 from Giovanni Bechis  ---
Some of those rules has been removed from 72_scores.cf some time ago, time to
close this bz ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786

Lemat le...@lemat.priv.pl changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||le...@lemat.priv.pl

--- Comment #4 from Lemat le...@lemat.priv.pl 2012-04-11 23:51:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 I fear I his those because of company generated mails.

those should match trusted_networks isn't it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786

Lucian Langa co...@mips.afraid.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||co...@mips.afraid.org

--- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa co...@mips.afraid.org 2012-04-08 23:14:28 
UTC ---
I fear I his those because of company generated mails.
I'm not sure but I think mails are constructed using some outdated mail
library.
Anyway this should have been reflected in my corpus earlier, shoudlnt't it ?
I'm not entirely sure how to start checking on those.

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786

Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com

--- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com 2012-04-04 12:09:34 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 A new sa-update hasn't been generated since 2012-02-25, how did your scores
 change a few days ago?
 
 Those rules are ranked pretty terribly.  Best rules are ranked 1, worst are
 ranked 0:
 
   MSECSSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK   SCORE  NAME   WHO/AGE
   0   0.5257   0.0050   0.9910.540.00  TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY  
   0   0.3420   0.0017   0.9950.520.00  TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX  
   0   0.2501   0.0011   0.9960.510.00  TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT  
 
 -
 http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120403-r1308758-nrule=%2FTO_EQ_FMsrcpath=g=Change
 
 Looks like all the hams hitting those three rules are in llanga's corpus.

It still has a nice S/O, though. I recommend a local scoring higher until we
can get masscheck chugging along!

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786

Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dar...@chaosreigns.com

--- Comment #1 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com 2012-04-04 04:23:29 UTC ---
A new sa-update hasn't been generated since 2012-02-25, how did your scores
change a few days ago?

Those rules are ranked pretty terribly.  Best rules are ranked 1, worst are
ranked 0:

  MSECSSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK   SCORE  NAME   WHO/AGE
  0   0.5257   0.0050   0.9910.540.00  TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY  
  0   0.3420   0.0017   0.9950.520.00  TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX  
  0   0.2501   0.0011   0.9960.510.00  TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT  

-
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120403-r1308758-nrule=%2FTO_EQ_FMsrcpath=g=Change

Looks like all the hams hitting those three rules are in llanga's corpus.

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.