[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786 Bill Colechanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC||sa-bugz-20080315@billmail.s ||cconsult.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Bill Cole --- The ruleset and its scoring has evolved away from this being anything like a problem, much less a bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786 Giovanni Bechischanged: What|Removed |Added CC||giova...@paclan.it --- Comment #5 from Giovanni Bechis --- Some of those rules has been removed from 72_scores.cf some time ago, time to close this bz ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786 Lemat le...@lemat.priv.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||le...@lemat.priv.pl --- Comment #4 from Lemat le...@lemat.priv.pl 2012-04-11 23:51:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I fear I his those because of company generated mails. those should match trusted_networks isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786 Lucian Langa co...@mips.afraid.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||co...@mips.afraid.org --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa co...@mips.afraid.org 2012-04-08 23:14:28 UTC --- I fear I his those because of company generated mails. I'm not sure but I think mails are constructed using some outdated mail library. Anyway this should have been reflected in my corpus earlier, shoudlnt't it ? I'm not entirely sure how to start checking on those. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com --- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com 2012-04-04 12:09:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) A new sa-update hasn't been generated since 2012-02-25, how did your scores change a few days ago? Those rules are ranked pretty terribly. Best rules are ranked 1, worst are ranked 0: MSECSSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE 0 0.5257 0.0050 0.9910.540.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY 0 0.3420 0.0017 0.9950.520.00 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX 0 0.2501 0.0011 0.9960.510.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT - http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120403-r1308758-nrule=%2FTO_EQ_FMsrcpath=g=Change Looks like all the hams hitting those three rules are in llanga's corpus. It still has a nice S/O, though. I recommend a local scoring higher until we can get masscheck chugging along! -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786 Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dar...@chaosreigns.com --- Comment #1 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com 2012-04-04 04:23:29 UTC --- A new sa-update hasn't been generated since 2012-02-25, how did your scores change a few days ago? Those rules are ranked pretty terribly. Best rules are ranked 1, worst are ranked 0: MSECSSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE 0 0.5257 0.0050 0.9910.540.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY 0 0.3420 0.0017 0.9950.520.00 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX 0 0.2501 0.0011 0.9960.510.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT - http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120403-r1308758-nrule=%2FTO_EQ_FMsrcpath=g=Change Looks like all the hams hitting those three rules are in llanga's corpus. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.