[Bug 7360] SPF check plugin should verify reply to (From:) as well

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7360 --- Comment #6 from AXB --- (In reply to Benny Pedersen from comment #5) > maybe Sender-ID is much much better then SPF? > > ironical microsoft does not use it anymore :-) > > (use dkim would be solution) > > or

[Bug 7360] SPF check plugin should verify reply to (From:) as well

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7360 --- Comment #5 from Benny Pedersen --- maybe Sender-ID is much much better then SPF? ironical microsoft does not use it anymore :-) (use dkim would be solution) or maybe time to make dmarc testing in SpamAssassin ? -- You

[Bug 7360] SPF check plugin should verify reply to (From:) as well

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7360 --- Comment #4 from AXB --- Please take further comments to the SA users list. Bugzilla is not the right place do discuss this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7360] SPF check plugin should verify reply to (From:) as well

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7360 --- Comment #3 from AXB --- (In reply to Petr Bena from comment #2) > Do you realize that this renders SPF check absolutely useless? Every script > kiddie can bypass it as it's implemented in SA right now.

[Bug 7360] SPF check plugin should verify reply to (From:) as well

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7360 Petr Bena changed: What|Removed |Added CC||petr@bena.rocks ---

[Bug 7360] SPF check plugin should verify reply to (From:) as well

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7360 AXB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED