https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
--- Comment #9 from Karsten Bräckelmann ---
*** Bug 7440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
--- Comment #8 from RW ---
One caveat, with an HTML link without a protocol you get both versions
so for test
__ALL_URI ==> got hit: "http://example.com";
__ALL_URI ==> got hit: "example.com"
with plain "\nexample.com" it's simp
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
Benny Pedersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@junc.eu
--- Comment #7 from B
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
RW changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwmailli...@googlemail.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
--- Comment #5 from Alex ---
Yes, this was from back around Jun 20th, but I forgot to file a bug report
then.
There was also something relating to parse_dkim_uris=1 that is specified in the
KAM.cf rules that causes this to happen. Users wit
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
John Hardin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jhar...@impsec.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
--- Comment #3 from Alex ---
No, I don't believe other headers affect this. I've tested it with SPF.
As a temporary work-around, I've created separate rules that adjust plus/minus
one for with/without the existence of __DKIM_EXISTS.
--
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kmcgr...@apache.org
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
Alex changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mysqlstud...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from A
