Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-05-11 Thread Boglarka Egyed
> > from their POV). Don't get me wrong, I'm totall NOT against 3.0, > > > though > > > > > > IMHO Sqoop-NG 1.0 would be a better choice. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kite: I would totally split this effort into

Fwd: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-05-10 Thread Attila Szabó
es not > > > > support > > > > > it "out of the box"). > > > > > > > > > > As the second substask I would start to remove every KITE based > > > > dependency > > > > > (but according to my gu

Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-05-10 Thread Boglarka Egyed
on that front). > > > > > > > > > > > > Hadoop 2: > > > > > > > > Could anyone please highlight me what would be the pros/cons on this > > > > front? AFAIK several vendors (including Cloudera, Hortonworks, MapR, > > EMR, > > > > etc.) are still su

Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-05-10 Thread Dániel Vörös
would vote for the compatibility for a bit more time/versions. > > > > > > > > > Dependencies: > > > > > > I'd like to cast my very direct and LOUD vote against any alpha > > > dependencies (including HBase or anything else!). IMHO Sqoop is &

Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-04-16 Thread Szabolcs Vasas
oop is already a > > stable component of the Apache Foundation, and the users can depend on > it, > > thus I'd like to avoid any kind of "immature" dependency related issues. > Of > > course this is also just my solo opinion, but as a community I think we > &

Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-04-16 Thread Dániel Vörös
s, > Attila > > > From: Szabolcs Vasas <va...@apache.org> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 3:43 PM > To: dev@sqoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release to support Hadoop 3 > > Hi all, > > I also think that completely eliminating the

Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-04-13 Thread Szabó Attila
forts, Best regards, Attila From: Szabolcs Vasas <va...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 3:43 PM To: dev@sqoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release to support Hadoop 3 Hi all, I also think that completely eliminating the Kite dependency from Sqoop would b

Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-04-13 Thread Szabolcs Vasas
Hi all, I also think that completely eliminating the Kite dependency from Sqoop would be the easiest way of going forward, I will try to analyze this topic a bit more next week and come up with subtasks so we could work on it in parallel potentially. I am happy with the Sqoop 3.0 scope proposal

Re: Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-04-13 Thread Boglarka Egyed
Hi Daniel et al, Thanks for bringing up this topic and the detailed status update. I am sharing my thoughts point by point, please find them below. 1) How to get a new Kite release? Maybe we should remove the Kite > dependency altogether (as Szabolcs hinted in comments of SQOOP-3171)? I think

Release to support Hadoop 3

2018-04-12 Thread Dániel Vörös
Dear All, After some development towards supporting Hadoop 3 (and latest version of downstream components) I'd like to summarize the current state of the upgrade and start the conversation about releasing a new version of Sqoop with Hadoop 3 support. Here's what happened so far: - Upgraded