On 11/26/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting ahead of myself, though. There's _lots_ more to discuss. ;-) To
get the ball rolling, if everyone else is on board with this, we'll want to
start, as the proposal suggests, with bringing the code into the Incubator,
and bringing
At 2:34 PM -0800 11/26/05, Martin Cooper wrote:
Great stuff! The idea of combining what I consider to be the two leading
action-oriented frameworks is very appealing. :-) I would definitely like to
pursue this.
+1 -- I think this is a very promising direction...
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
interesting. and promising! i'll keep on eye on this. webwork has
long had better velocity integration that struts. this proposed
merger might either obviate the need for VelocityStruts integration in
VelocityTools or else provide an opportune time to shift some of that
code over to the
Great stuff! The idea of combining what I consider to be the two leading
action-oriented frameworks is very appealing. :-) I would definitely like to
pursue this.
We'll probably need to do some juggling to make the two-phase Ti approach
work, but that sounds like a decent way to go about it. As
Presented by: Don Brown, Ted Husted, Jason Carreira, and Patrick Lightbody
Between the Clarity hubbub [1] and the Java Web Alignment brouhaha
[2], it came up that WebWork would like to merge with another
framework. Ted and Don followed up with the two core WebWork
developers, Patrick Lightbody
Capital!
On 11/25/05, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presented by: Don Brown, Ted Husted, Jason Carreira, and Patrick Lightbody
Between the Clarity hubbub [1] and the Java Web Alignment brouhaha
[2], it came up that WebWork would like to merge with another
framework. Ted and Don
