Re: RFC: BLOBAction

2004-09-21 Thread Frank W. Zammetti (MLists)
You know Martin, I was all set to reply with two or three points that I THOUGHT were valid against this, but as I started writing them up (I think three or four messages began and aborted!) I decided what you've done I actually DO like! :) The one comment that remains is this... The approach I

Re: RFC: BLOBAction and Struts Bloat

2004-09-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
Thanks for your comments, Michael. If you've been following the dev list lately, you've seen some beginning discussions on a Struts 2.0 rearchitecting that would indeed leverage everything we've all learned in the four years since Struts was first created. I have some specific proposals to make

RE: RFC: BLOBAction and Struts Bloat

2004-09-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Craig, In the near future, you'll also see the initial release candidate of the Struts-Faces integration library (packaged separately from the rest of Struts) that allows JavaServer Faces to be used with Struts 1.1 or 1.2 based applications, including the use of the Tiles Framework and

Re: RFC: BLOBAction and Struts Bloat

2004-09-21 Thread Vic
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Craig, Btw. like Michael, I am interessted in your proposals on Struts 2.0 too :) Checkout this: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-chain .V -- Please post on Rich Internet Applications User Interface (RiA/SoA) http://www.portalvu.com

Re: RFC: BLOBAction

2004-09-20 Thread Frank W. Zammetti (MLists)
-- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com I don't really like your approach and don't want to see such an Action added to a Framework like Struts. Here's a few comments why: A big part of the reason I posted this was to see if this

[Fwd: Re: RFC: BLOBAction]

2004-09-20 Thread Frank W. Zammetti (MLists)
I agree with Reinhard's reasons that something this specific to particular data access mechanisms might not be appropriate as a part of the core framework. That being said, questions about downloading binary data come up often enough that something like this would make a dandy example

Re: RFC: BLOBAction and Struts Bloat

2004-09-20 Thread bryan
There are some things that I certainly agree with michael on and this is one of them. I think ( and i'm not alone in thinking this ) that struts needs a complete overhaul. At present the only reason I use it is because all the existing tooling supports it. eg m7 nitrox, WSAD, MyEclipse etc

Re: RFC: BLOBAction

2004-09-20 Thread Martin Cooper
I'd been thinking about something in between. How about an Action that does all the drudge work, but leaves the details to the implementor? Something, perhaps, like this: http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/DownloadAction.java This provides easy solutions for downloading files from the file

Re: RFC: BLOBAction

2004-09-17 Thread bryan
Ok, I'm not knocking jdbc but for me using hibernate this is what my action class looks like public ActionForward execute(ActionMapping mapping, ActionForm form, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws Exception { Long id = new