Re: FSFS recovery should prune rep-cache even if its use is disabled

Julian Foad wrote: > It looks like r1213716 ("also prune the rep-cache when it's present but > reportedly not being used") was reverted by r1367674, apparently > unintentionally. Well, with some degree of intention, judging by the code comment having been adjusted accordingly, but with no

FSFS recovery should prune rep-cache even if its use is disabled

It looks like r1213716 ("also prune the rep-cache when it's present but reportedly not being used") was reverted by r1367674, apparently unintentionally. https://svn.apache.org/r1213716 (on 2011-12-13) > Follow-up to r1213681: also prune the rep-cache when it's present > but reportedly not

Re: FSFS recovery should prune rep-cache even if its use is disabled

Julian Foad wrote on Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:20 +0100: > Julian Foad wrote: > > It looks like r1213716 ("also prune the rep-cache when it's present but > > reportedly not being used") was reverted by r1367674, apparently > > unintentionally. > > Well, with some degree of intention, judging by the