On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 05:38:44PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> I plan to make the 1.11.x branch in the next few days if I'm satisfied with
> the items below.
The conflict resolver does not support ambiguous moves yet
for 'local missing' conflicts. I hope to get to that soon.
Patches for this
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:38 PM Julian Foad wrote:
>
> I plan to make the 1.11.x branch in the next few days if I'm satisfied with
> the items below.
>
>
> Julian Foad wrote on 2018-08-13:
> > We plan to release 1.11 in October, let's say mid-October, so we should
> > branch and feature-freeze
I plan to make the 1.11.x branch in the next few days if I'm satisfied with the
items below.
Julian Foad wrote on 2018-08-13:
> We plan to release 1.11 in October, let's say mid-October, so we should
> branch and feature-freeze in mid-August, which is just about now.
>
> AFAIK the only
Most of these issues have already been addressed by Brane,
but as he wished for my input, here it is.
These are the guiding principles for the 1.10 authz design:
(1) ACLs are only evaluated on a per-user bases; ACLs that
don't mention this user (or any of their groups) are ignored.
Hey there,
due to 80% desirable changes in my personal life,
I suddenly found myself falling off the Subversion
diskworld. Sorry for the sudden loss of communication,
it was never intentional.
From where I am now, it seems that I will stay in
Europe. My hope is to get back to regular
5 matches
Mail list logo
