RE: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: zaterdag 7 augustus 2010 13:07 > To: Daniel Shahaf > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: svn_wc_translated_file3 > > On 07.08.2010 12:52, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > What's the solution? > > I'm using svn

RE: svn commit: r983766 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c

2010-08-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf > Of Hyrum K. Wright > Sent: maandag 9 augustus 2010 20:42 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r983766 - > /subversion/branches/performanc

RE: svn commit: r983766 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c

2010-08-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: maandag 9 augustus 2010 20:45 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Cc: stef...@apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r983766 - > /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c > > stef...

RE: NOTICE: Testing over ra-dav has changed in trunk!!

2010-08-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: woensdag 11 augustus 2010 12:41 > To: C. Michael Pilato > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; cmpil...@apache.org; > comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: NOTICE: Testing over ra-dav has changed in trunk!

RE: Bikeshed: configuration override order

2010-08-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com] > Sent: woensdag 11 augustus 2010 15:42 > To: Branko Čibej; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: Bikeshed: configuration override order > > > On 11.08.2010 11:05, Bolstridge, Andrew wrote: > > > The second aspect: c

RE: svn commit: r984007 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c

2010-08-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 11 augustus 2010 21:30 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r984007 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c > > I think you *always* want wq operations to be cancel

RE: [RFC] Change svn_wc_add_repos_file4(copyfrom_url) to (_root, _relpath)

2010-08-12 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: donderdag 12 augustus 2010 15:43 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: [RFC] Change svn_wc_add_repos_file4(copyfrom_url) to (_root, > _relpath) > > svn_wc_add_repos_file4(..., copyfrom_url, ...) has a

RE: Confusing svn_log_entry_t docstrings.

2010-08-13 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net] > Sent: vrijdag 13 augustus 2010 18:40 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: Confusing svn_log_entry_t docstrings. > > Can someone help me make sense of some of our public docstrings? I'm > looking at the svn_

RE: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected?

2010-08-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Lefevre [mailto:vincent-...@vinc17.net] > Sent: zaterdag 14 augustus 2010 15:01 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected? > > On 2010-08-14 04:05:17 +0100, chr...@lavabit.com wrote: > > Is this expected/desi

RE: [WIP] Enable passing copyfrom information for the diff code when dealing with repository diffs.

2010-08-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Näslund [mailto:dan...@longitudo.com] > Sent: zondag 15 augustus 2010 12:27 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: [WIP] Enable passing copyfrom information for the diff code when > dealing with repository diffs. > > Hi! > > Why doesn't svn_ra_do_

RE: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected?

2010-08-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Lefevre [mailto:vincent-...@vinc17.net] > Sent: zondag 15 augustus 2010 16:50 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected? > > On 2010-08-15 05:34:08 -0700, Bert Huijben wrote: > >

RE: svn commit: r985735 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/repos_diff_summarize.c tests/cmdline/diff_tests.py

2010-08-16 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: sbut...@apache.org [mailto:sbut...@apache.org] > Sent: zondag 15 augustus 2010 12:05 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r985735 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > libsvn_client/repos_diff_summarize.c tests/cmdline/diff_tests.py > > A

RE: svn commit: r986332 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: wc-queries.sql wc_db.c

2010-08-17 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: e...@apache.org [mailto:e...@apache.org] > Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 7:43 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r986332 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: > wc-queries.sql wc_db.c > > Author: ehu > Date: Tue Aug 17 14:42:42

RE: svnrdump: The BIG update

2010-08-17 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ramkumar Ramachandra [mailto:artag...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 9:09 > To: Daniel Shahaf > Cc: Subversion-dev Mailing List > Subject: Re: svnrdump: The BIG update > > Hi Daniel, > > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Th

RE: svn_client_status5() and depth

2010-08-17 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:28 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: svn_client_status5() and depth > > Hi, > > * check out a folder with depth svn_depth_empty (svn co > file:///d:/testrepo/trunk testwc) >

RE: svn_client_status5() and depth

2010-08-17 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:28 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: svn_client_status5() and depth > > Hi, > > * check out a folder with depth svn_depth_empty (svn co > file:///d:/testrepo/trunk testwc) >

RE: svn_client_status5() and depth

2010-08-17 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:45 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Subversion Development' > Subject: Re: svn_client_status5() and depth > > On 17.08.2010 21:37, Bert Huijben wrote:

RE: svn commit: r986466 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/dump_editor.c

2010-08-17 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: artag...@apache.org [mailto:artag...@apache.org] > Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:49 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r986466 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/dump_editor.c > > Author: artagnon > Date: Tue Aug 17 19:48:32

RE: svn_client_status5() and depth

2010-08-18 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 11:39 > To: Hyrum K. Wright > Cc: C. Michael Pilato; Bert Huijben; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: svn_client_status5() and depth > > On 17.08.201

RE: svn commit: r986865 - /subversion/trunk/notes/wc-ng/node-data

2010-08-18 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] > Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 12:17 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r986865 - /subversion/trunk/notes/wc-ng/node-data > > Author: philip > Date: Wed Aug 18 19:16:59 2010 > New Revisio

RE: svn_client_status5() and depth

2010-08-18 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 13:37 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Hyrum K. Wright'; 'C. Michael Pilato'; 'Subversion Development' > Subject: Re: svn_client_status5() an

RE: Performance branch ready for review

2010-08-18 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 15:59 > To: Stefan Fuhrmann > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: Performance branch ready for review > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann > wrote: > > Hi @all

RE: svn commit: r986865 - /subversion/trunk/notes/wc-ng/node-data

2010-08-19 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: donderdag 19 augustus 2010 3:39 > To: Greg Stein > Cc: Bert Huijben; dev@subversion.apache.org; phi...@apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r986865 - /subversion/trunk/notes/

RE: svn diff optimization to make blame faster?

2010-08-19 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 19 augustus 2010 4:55 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: svn diff optimization to make blame faster? > > > I googled around a bit for C profilers on Windows. I found several > which seem

RE: svn commit: r987513 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/svnrdump.c

2010-08-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: artag...@apache.org [mailto:artag...@apache.org] > Sent: vrijdag 20 augustus 2010 7:09 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r987513 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/svnrdump.c > > Author: artagnon > Date: Fri Aug 20 14:08:42 201

RE: svn commit: r987526 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c

2010-08-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 20 augustus 2010 9:55 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r987526 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:31, wrote: > >... > > +++ subve

RE: [RFC] 'External' and 'Switched': common ground

2010-08-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: vrijdag 20 augustus 2010 10:54 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: [RFC] 'External' and 'Switched': common ground > > What's the idea? > > > External means Switched > === > >

RE: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit?

2010-08-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: vrijdag 20 augustus 2010 3:29 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit? > > I think that the recent NODE_DATA developments in wc-ng show that wc-ng > is still in flux, o

RE: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit?

2010-08-21 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: zaterdag 21 augustus 2010 3:32 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit? > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:55:10AM -

RE: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit?

2010-08-21 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] On Behalf Of Bert Huijben > Sent: zaterdag 21 augustus 2010 9:18 > To: 'Stefan Sperling' > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit? > &

RE: svn commit: r988074 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svntest/wc.py upgrade_tests.py

2010-08-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] > Sent: maandag 23 augustus 2010 13:23 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r988074 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svntest/wc.py > upgrade_tests.py > > Author: philip > Dat

RE: svn commit: r988074 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svntest/wc.py upgrade_tests.py

2010-08-24 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: dinsdag 24 augustus 2010 10:40 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r988074 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svntest/wc.

RE: svn commit: r988074 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svntest/wc.py upgrade_tests.py

2010-08-24 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: dinsdag 24 augustus 2010 13:04 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Philip Martin'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: svn commit: r988074 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversi

RE: svn commit: r988550 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/entries.c tests/cmdline/upgrade_tests.py

2010-08-24 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] > Sent: dinsdag 24 augustus 2010 16:13 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r988550 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > libsvn_wc/entries.c tests/cmdline/upgrade_tests.py > > Author: philip >

RE: svn commit: r988074 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svntest/wc.py upgrade_tests.py

2010-08-24 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: dinsdag 24 augustus 2010 16:58 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Julian Foad'; 'Bert Huijben'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r988074 - in > /

RE: svn commit: r988956 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c

2010-08-25 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: woensdag 25 augustus 2010 14:52 > To: Philip Martin > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r988956 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:00:

RE: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-db upgrade

2010-08-26 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: donderdag 26 augustus 2010 16:34 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-db upgrade > > One of the problems with single-db upgrade is that write_entry, called > from svn_

RE: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-db upgrade

2010-08-26 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: donderdag 26 augustus 2010 21:33 > To: Greg Stein > Cc: Bert Huijben; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-db upgrade > > Philip Martin writes

RE: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-db upgrade

2010-08-27 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: vrijdag 27 augustus 2010 11:50 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Greg Stein'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-db upgrade > > "Bert

RE: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-db upgrade

2010-08-27 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: vrijdag 27 augustus 2010 14:57 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Bert Huijben'; 'Greg Stein'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Two svn_wc__db_t for single-

RE: svn commit: r990537 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_temp_ser ializer.c

2010-08-30 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: zondag 29 augustus 2010 16:36 > To: Johan Corveleyn > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; stef...@apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r990537 - > /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_te

RE: svn commit: r990916 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp ClientContext.h

2010-08-31 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of > Hyrum Wright > Sent: maandag 30 augustus 2010 21:43 > To: Subversion Development > Cc: commits > Subject: Re: svn commit: r990916 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: Cl

RE: svn commit: r990916 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp ClientContext.h

2010-08-31 Thread Bert Huijben
> ClientContext.h > > "Bert Huijben" writes: > > > (I see a completely different test failure on the Windows bot) > > On Linux I get the same as Hyrum. > > > Can you run this same test with single-db? > > In single-db on Linux I ge

RE: Recursive revert behavior (was: svn commit: r990916 )

2010-08-31 Thread Bert Huijben
> ClientContext.h > > "Bert Huijben" writes: > See original thread > > > The current recursive lock code for multi-db doesn't have stable > behavior > > over added and removed directories, while the single-db code has. I > didn't > > feel l

RE: svn commit: r990916 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp ClientContext.h

2010-08-31 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of > Hyrum Wright > Sent: maandag 30 augustus 2010 21:43 > To: Subversion Development > Cc: commits > Subject: Re: svn commit: r990916 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: Cl

RE: Enabling Single-DB mode today

2010-08-31 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: dinsdag 31 augustus 2010 15:41 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Enabling Single-DB mode today > > We want to get to single-DB mode ASAP. Is anything still blocking us > from enabling it today? >

RE: svn commit: r991642 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

2010-09-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 2 september 2010 2:05 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r991642 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 14:34, wrote: > > Author: rhuijben

RE: svn commit: r991619 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_client/commit.c libsvn_client/commit_util.c libsvn_client/merge.c libsvn_wc/entries.c libsvn_wc/node.

2010-09-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 2 september 2010 2:16 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r991619 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_client/commit.c > libsvn_client/commit_

RE: svn commit: r992050 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py

2010-09-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: pbu...@apache.org [mailto:pbu...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 2 september 2010 20:51 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r992050 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py > > Author: pburba > Date: Thu Sep 2 18:51:

RE: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE_DATA, WORKING_NODE and BASE_NODE into a single table (NODES)

2010-09-03 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 3 september 2010 1:14 > To: Julian Foad > Cc: Erik Huelsmann; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE_DATA, WORKING_NODE and > BASE_NODE into a single table (NODES) > > On Thu,

RE: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE_DATA, WORKING_NODE and BASE_NODE into a single table (NODES)

2010-09-03 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 3 september 2010 17:23 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: Julian Foad; Erik Huelsmann; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE_DATA, WORKING_NODE and > BASE_NOD

RE: Worried about single-db performance

2010-09-04 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: justin.erenkra...@gmail.com [mailto:justin.erenkra...@gmail.com] > On Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz > Sent: zaterdag 4 september 2010 8:33 > To: Greg Stein > Cc: Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: Worried about single-db performance > > On F

RE: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE_DATA, WORKING_NODE and BASE_NODE into a single table (NODES)

2010-09-04 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: zaterdag 4 september 2010 6:28 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: Julian Foad; Erik Huelsmann; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE_DATA, WORKING_NODE and > BASE_NOD

RE: Repeated SQL queries when doing 'svn st'

2010-09-05 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: justin.erenkra...@gmail.com [mailto:justin.erenkra...@gmail.com] > On Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz > Sent: zaterdag 4 september 2010 20:20 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: Repeated SQL queries when doing 'svn st' > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:18 AM,

RE: svn commit: r992886 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: wc-queries.sql wc_db.c

2010-09-06 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: e...@apache.org [mailto:e...@apache.org] > Sent: zondag 5 september 2010 22:16 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r992886 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: > wc-queries.sql wc_db.c > > Author: ehu > Date: Sun Sep 5 20:16:10

RE: Worried about single-db performance

2010-09-06 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com] > Sent: maandag 6 september 2010 15:07 > To: Justin Erenkrantz > Cc: Bert Huijben; Greg Stein; Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: Worried about single-db performance >

RE: svnsync --source-username with svn+ssh

2010-09-07 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: mrmrpotatoh...@gmail.com [mailto:mrmrpotatoh...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Ben K > Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 4:22 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svnsync --source-username with svn+ssh > > I'm having some trouble with svnsync using ssh as a tra

RE: Worried about single-db performance

2010-09-07 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com] > Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 13:48 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Justin Erenkrantz'; 'Greg Stein'; 'Johan Corveleyn'; 'Subversion > Development' > Subject:

RE: svn commit: r992390 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_sqlite.h libsvn_subr/sqlite.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.c libsvn_wc/wc_db.h

2010-09-07 Thread Bert Huijben
Because a simple test with using this lock with status shows a 70% performance increase on Windows. You can't get to this speed with just removing 50% of the info queries and Philips tests showed that this is probably the only way to get back at 1.6 status performance. Bert - Oorspronkel

RE: svn commit: r995388 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/update_tests.py

2010-09-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: style...@apache.org [mailto:style...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 13:47 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r995388 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/update_tests.py > > Author: stylesen > Date: Thu Sep 9

RE: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: s...@apache.org [mailto:s...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 17:52 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r995475 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c > > Author: stsp > Date: Thu Sep 9 15:51:34 2010 > New R

RE: [RFC] 'base' is what in --accept=base?

2010-09-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 18:56 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: [RFC] 'base' is what in --accept=base? > > What do we expect 'svn merge --accept=base' to do when encountering > text conflicts? (Guessing:

RE: svn commit: r995475 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c

2010-09-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: vrijdag 10 september 2010 15:26 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r995475 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c > > On Thu,

RE: In svn_subst_translate_string(), shouldn't REPAIR in the call to svn_subst_translate_cstring2() be TRUE?

2010-09-14 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Trebbien [mailto:dtrebb...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 14 september 2010 0:56 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: In svn_subst_translate_string(), shouldn't REPAIR in the call > to svn_subst_translate_cstring2() be TRUE? > > Looking through the sou

RE: svn commit: r997026 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c

2010-09-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org] > Sent: dinsdag 14 september 2010 20:09 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r997026 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c > > Author: cmpilato > Date: Tue Sep 14 18:08:59 2

RE: svn commit: r997237 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp ClientContext.h SVNClient.cpp

2010-09-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org] > Sent: woensdag 15 september 2010 11:18 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r997237 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp > ClientContext.h SVNClient

RE: [Issue 3474] making a new subdir, moving files into it and then renaming the subdir, breaks history of the moved files

2010-09-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: woensdag 15 september 2010 12:08 > To: Julian Foad > Cc: Daniel Shahaf; Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: [Issue 3474] making a new subdir, moving files into it and > then renaming

RE: svn commit: r997639 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h

2010-09-16 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 10:24 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r997639 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h > > Author: hwright > Date: Thu Sep 16 08:23:54 2

RE: svn commit: r997670 - in /subversion/branches/object-model: ./ subversion/bindings/c++/ subversion/tests/libsvn++/

2010-09-16 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 12:02 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r997670 - in /subversion/branches/object-model: ./ > subversion/bindings/c++/ subversion/tests/libsvn++/ > > Au

RE: svn commit: r997403 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql

2010-09-16 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 19:47 > To: Greg Stein > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r997403 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql > > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16

RE: svn commit: r997854 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: wc-queries.sql wc_db.c

2010-09-16 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 19:25 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r997854 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: wc-queries.sql wc_db.c > > Author: philip > Date: Thu Sep

RE: Performance branch review: single revision changes

2010-09-19 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de] > Sent: zondag 19 september 2010 21:59 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: Performance branch review: single revision changes > > Hi there, > > as per public request, this is a list of smaller changes

RE: [PATCH 3/3] atomic-revprop: Signal the error as a HTTP status code

2010-09-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Jon Foster [mailto:jon.fos...@cabot.co.uk] > Sent: maandag 20 september 2010 12:01 > To: Daniel Shahaf; Subversion Development > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] atomic-revprop: Signal the error as a HTTP status code > > Hi, > > For atomic-revprop, the client needs to k

RE: Terminology (was: [PATCH 3/3] atomic-revprop: Signal the error as a HTTP status code)

2010-09-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: 'Daniel Shahaf' [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: maandag 20 september 2010 12:58 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Jon Foster'; 'Subversion Development' > Subject: Terminology (was: [PATCH 3/3] atomic-r

RE: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on svn-debian-x86_64-32 shared gcc

2010-09-21 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 21 september 2010 10:42 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on svn-debian-x86_64-32 > shared gcc > > What's up with this buildbot? > > I've noticed a lot of flap

RE: svn commit: r998296 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h

2010-09-22 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of > Hyrum Wright > Sent: woensdag 22 september 2010 22:07 > To: Daniel Shahaf > Cc: Julian Foad; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r998296 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/inclu

RE: trunk failing tests on Windows XP (32 bit): prop-tests.py 33, stat-tests.py 5, upgrade-tests.py 11

2010-09-30 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 1:51 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: trunk failing tests on Windows XP (32 bit): prop-tests.py 33, > stat-tests.py 5, upgrade-tests.py 11 > > Hi devs, > > The following tests fai

RE: [PATCH] extend svn_subst_translate_string() to record whether re-encoding and/or line ending translation were performed

2010-10-01 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 12:58 > To: Daniel Trebbien > Cc: Subversion Development; Daniel Shahaf; Gavin Beau Baumanis > Subject: Re: [PATCH] extend svn_subst_translate_string() to record > whether re-encoding a

RE: 1.6.13 up for signing/testing

2010-10-01 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 16:51 > To: Hyrum K. Wright > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: 1.6.13 up for signing/testing > > On Wed, 2010-09-29, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > > 1.6.13 tarballs are up for tes

RE: trunk failing tests on Windows XP (32 bit): prop-tests.py 33, stat-tests.py 5, upgrade-tests.py 11

2010-10-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 15:46 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: trunk failing tests on Windows XP (32 bit): prop-tests.py > 33, stat-tests.py 5

RE: svn commit: r1003924 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/dump_editor.c

2010-10-03 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: artag...@apache.org [mailto:artag...@apache.org] > Sent: zondag 3 oktober 2010 9:05 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1003924 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/dump_editor.c > > Author: artagnon > Date: Sun Oct 3 07:05:05 20

RE: Format 20 upgrade to NODES

2010-10-06 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehu...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 6 oktober 2010 17:46 > To: Julian Foad > Cc: Philip Martin; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Format 20 upgrade to NODES > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Julian Foad > wrote: > > On Wed, 201

GPG support on Windows and OS/X? (Was RE: svn commit: r1005788 - /subversion/branches/gpg-agent-password-store/subversion/libsvn_subr/config_file.c)

2010-10-08 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: style...@apache.org [mailto:style...@apache.org] > Sent: vrijdag 8 oktober 2010 13:52 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1005788 - /subversion/branches/gpg-agent- > password-store/subversion/libsvn_subr/config_file.c > > Author: stylese

RE: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2010-10-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: artag...@apache.org [mailto:artag...@apache.org] > Sent: maandag 4 oktober 2010 17:27 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ > subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c > > Author: artagnon > Date: Mon Oct 4 15:26:44 2

RE: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2010-10-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: maandag 11 oktober 2010 11:03 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; artag...@apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ > subversion/libsvn_subr/io.

RE: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2010-10-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] > Sent: maandag 11 oktober 2010 11:46 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Greg Stein'; dev@subversion.apache.org; artag...@apache.org > Subject: RE: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/trunk:

RE: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2010-10-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ramkumar Ramachandra [mailto:artag...@gmail.com] > Sent: maandag 11 oktober 2010 14:54 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; 'Greg Stein'; 'Julian Foad' > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1004286 - in /subversion/t

RE: svn commit: r1022707 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2010-10-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: donderdag 14 oktober 2010 23:39 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1022707 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ > subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:00:44PM -, hwri...@a

RE: svn commit: r1024187 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

2010-10-19 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] > Sent: dinsdag 19 oktober 2010 11:33 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1024187 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c > > Author: philip > Date: Tue Oct 19 09:33:06 2010 > New

RE: svn commit: r1026128 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c

2010-10-22 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: e...@apache.org [mailto:e...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 21 oktober 2010 22:27 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1026128 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c > > Author: ehu > Date: Thu Oct 21 20:26:30 2010 > New Re

RE: wc-ng: Storing conflict information on the victim: trials and pitfalls

2010-10-27 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of > Hyrum K. Wright > Sent: dinsdag 26 oktober 2010 23:49 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: wc-ng: Storing conflict information on the victim: trials and > pitfalls > > This mail is part 2

RE: wc-ng: Storing conflict information on the victim: trials and pitfalls

2010-10-28 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of > Hyrum K. Wright > Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2010 6:22 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: wc-ng: Storing conflict information on the victim:

RE: svn commit: r1028316 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql libsvn_wc/wc_db.c tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py

2010-10-28 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2010 16:27 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1028316 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql libsvn_wc/wc_db.c tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py

RE: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3609

2010-11-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Noorul Islam K M [mailto:noo...@collab.net] > Sent: dinsdag 2 november 2010 11:08 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3609 > > > Log > > [[[ > > Fix issue 3609: Canonicalize url > > * subversion/svn/info-cmd.c > (svn_cl__inf

RE: svn_client_delete with multiple targets

2010-11-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 2 november 2010 20:21 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: svn_client_delete with multiple targets > > Hi, > > I found a small problem in svn_client_delete4() when passing multiple > urls to delet

RE: [Patch] Make svn_tristate_t compatible with svn_boolean_t

2010-11-04 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de] > Sent: donderdag 4 november 2010 0:21 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: [Patch] Make svn_tristate_t compatible with svn_boolean_t > > Hi there, > > after stumbling twice over this issue, I ran grep

RE: svn commit: r1030912 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: adm_crawler.c update_editor.c

2010-11-04 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 4 november 2010 13:46 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1030912 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: adm_crawler.c update_editor.c > > Author: cmpilato > Da

RE: svn commit: r1031035 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

2010-11-04 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org] > Sent: donderdag 4 november 2010 16:31 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1031035 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c > > Author: hwright > Date: Thu Nov 4 15:31:14 2010

RE: svn_tristate_t Re: svn commit: r1033006 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_types.h

2010-11-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: woensdag 10 november 2010 0:26 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Cc: Daniel Shahaf > Subject: Re: svn_tristate_t Re: svn commit: r1033006 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_types.h > > Daniel Sh

RE: Stop distributing notes/

2010-11-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Samuelson [mailto:pe...@p12n.org] > Sent: woensdag 10 november 2010 18:42 > To: Hyrum K. Wright > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: Stop distributing notes/ > > > [Hyrum K. Wright] > > Instead of trying to cherry-pick specific notes/ to include i

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >