Thank you, Melissa, for tracking this down!
Your effort is very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Stefan
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 11:18:43PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> [Moving this to the dev@s.a.o list.]
>
> Well done! It looks like you have identified a serious bug here. The
> function
Philip Martin writes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4722
I've proposed a fix in STATUS.
--
Philip
Nathan Hartman writes:
> Is it possible and does it make sense to always continue reading until
> EOF, when the read is either 0 or < 16k? In other words to eliminate
> the comparison against the expanded size?
I believe setting the expanded size correctly is the only
Julian Foad writes:
> Please would you file this issue in the issue tracker so I can give
> outsiders a reference to it?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4722
My reproduction doesn't trigger the bug in 1.8 but that seems to be
because 1.8 has some other problem
Please would you file this issue in the issue tracker so I can give
outsiders a reference to it?
- Julian
Philip Martin wrote:
Philip Martin writes:
svn cat http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/INSTALL@1826165 > f1
(for i in `seq 0 8712`;do echo
Please would you file this issue in the issue tracker so I can give
outsiders a reference to it?
- Julian
Philip Martin wrote:
Philip Martin writes:
svn cat http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/INSTALL@1826165 > f1
(for i in `seq 0 8712`;do echo
Philip Martin writes:
> svn cat http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/INSTALL@1826165 > f1
> (for i in `seq 0 8712`;do echo -n $i;done && echo -n 1) > f1
> svnadmin create repo
> svnmucc -mm -U file://`pwd`/repo put f1 f
> svnmucc -mm -U
Philip Martin writes:
> (for i in `seq 0 8712`;do echo -n $i;done && echo -n 1) > f1
Oops, that should be > f2
--
Philip
Nathan Hartman writes:
> That makes me wonder why this has not triggered more frequently for
> users? Is there some obscure set of circumstances that triggers this
> code path in this particular way? If so, can a test be added to the
> test suite to prevent this sort of
On Mar 7, 2018, at 6:18 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>
> [Moving this to the dev@s.a.o list.]
>
> Well done! It looks like you have identified a serious bug here. The
> function svn_fs_fs__get_contents_from_file() that was recently added to
> 1.9 for the SHA1 collision
[Moving this to the dev@s.a.o list.]
Well done! It looks like you have identified a serious bug here. The
function svn_fs_fs__get_contents_from_file() that was recently added to
1.9 for the SHA1 collision detection so the code is new and it is also
different from that on trunk.
Your proposed
11 matches
Mail list logo