Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-16 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: What's 1.9's new end-of-life date, then? Until what (past or future) date do we _commit_ to backporting critical fixes? The release date of the next LTS release. According to the currently planned release cycles, that will be v1.14 in April 2020. (It might be affected

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:47 +00:00: > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > [...] > But the amount of work involved in everyone else running tests and > signing > > releases must also be considered. We barely made the required signature > > count > > for our last 3 releases. Focussing our

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-16 Thread Julian Foad
Stefan Sperling wrote: [...] > But the amount of work involved in everyone else running tests and signing releases must also be considered. We barely made the required signature count for our last 3 releases. Focussing our volunteer resources on releases that are actually used by Debian and

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:40:50PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 05.08.2019 20:27, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015). > > > http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that > > > each LTS

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-12 Thread Julian Foad
Branko Čibej wrote: On 05.08.2019 20:27, Stefan Sperling wrote: Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015). http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that each LTS release is supported for 4 years. Julian said on IRC that perhaps we decided to

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 05.08.2019 20:27, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015). > http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that > each LTS release is supported for 4 years. > > Julian said on IRC that perhaps we decided to support 2 LTS

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-05 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:27 PM Stefan Sperling wrote: > Those two operating systems have always been the ones shipping the > oldest possible SVN release, as far as I can remember. So if they don't > need Subversion 1.9, I don't see any reason for us to support it beyond > its 4 years lifetime