Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:59:36 +:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:20:20 +0100:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:20:16PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun,
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:20:20 +0100:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:20:16PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 22:36:39 +:
> > > > Stefan Sperling wrote on
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:20:16PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 22:36:39 +:
> > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 23:22:22 +0200:
> > > > Reading our openhub stats
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:20:16PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 22:36:39 +:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 23:22:22 +0200:
> > > Reading our openhub stats for fun I noticed that the stats
> > > are totally screwed. It seems they
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 22:36:39 +:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 23:22:22 +0200:
> > Reading our openhub stats for fun I noticed that the stats
> > are totally screwed. It seems they stop scanning our history
> > at r1295006 (the infamous commit that
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 23:22:22 +0200:
> Reading our openhub stats for fun I noticed that the stats
> are totally screwed. It seems they stop scanning our history
> at r1295006 (the infamous commit that changed our trunk's copy ID).
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
