[dev] [st] Multiplexing support

Hello everyone, While looking through the st TODO file, I found the task "add a simple way to do multiplexing". I was wondering what this is supposed to be? Something like tabbing/tiling the terminal? And why do that? In my opinion, this can be done by dwm and tabbed. So am I just understanding

[dev] [st] patch for bold, italic, underline colors

Hello, I was unable to push the attached patch to the st wiki: $ git push Counting objects: 7, done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 8.82 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 7 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta

Re: [dev] [st] patch for bold, italic, underline colors

Hi Suraj, * Suraj N. Kurapati [2017-04-23 12:09]: > Please review and apply the attached patch on my behalf. I think we don't need it, as you can do it using environment variables: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/119/colors-in-man-pages Cheers Jochen

Re: [dev] [st] Multiplexing support

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 04:38:57PM +0200, Janne Heß wrote: > Hello everyone, > > While looking through the st TODO file, I found the task "add a simple > way to do multiplexing". > I was wondering what this is supposed to be? Something like > tabbing/tiling the terminal? And why do that? In my

Re: [dev] [st] patch for bold, italic, underline colors

Hi Suraj, usually, git protocol is read-only. Have you tried pushing with the remote set to http://git.suckless.org/sites ? Cheers. On 23/04/17 16:09, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: Hello, I was unable to push the attached patch to the st wiki: $ git push Counting objects: 7, done.

Re: [dev] [st] patch for bold, italic, underline colors

On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 21:35:33 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > I think we don't need it, as you can do it using environment > variables: > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/119/colors-in-man-pages Thanks for the tip! Perhaps this patch may still be useful for cases where less(1) is

Re: [dev] [st] patch for bold, italic, underline colors

On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 22:23:56 -0300, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > usually, git protocol is read-only. Have you tried pushing with > the remote set to http://git.suckless.org/sites ? Yes I tried that, but a similar failure occurred: $ git remote set-url origin http://git.suckless.org/sites