Re: [dev] Migration to git
On 29 November 2012 12:13, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote: With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the suckless repositories in one fell sweep? curl -s http://git.suckless.org/ | xml sel -N x=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; -t -m //x:a -v '@title' -n | grep . | while read repo do git clone git://git.suckless.org/$repo done http://dabase.com/e/09020/
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Kai Hendry hen...@iki.fi wrote: On 29 November 2012 12:13, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote: With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the suckless repositories in one fell sweep? curl -s http://git.suckless.org/ | xml sel -N x=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; -t -m //x:a -v '@title' -n | grep . | while read repo do git clone git://git.suckless.org/$repo done http://dabase.com/e/09020/ are you fucking kidding me
Re: [dev] Migration to git
fantastic! On 9 December 2012 10:29, Kai Hendry hen...@iki.fi wrote: On 29 November 2012 12:13, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote: With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the suckless repositories in one fell sweep? curl -s http://git.suckless.org/ | xml sel -N x=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; -t -m //x:a -v '@title' -n | grep . | while read repo do git clone git://git.suckless.org/$repo done http://dabase.com/e/09020/
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On 11/30/2012 01:57 AM, uki wrote: you can still use mercurial, with it's hg-git extension, I sometimes had small problems with it on huge repositories at work, never had any problem with open source projects (maybe it's the size or less of 'do whatever' attitude) Yeah, I'm not much of a hg user, I prefer git because I'm used to it. But if this keeps the patch queue I might use it, I'll look into it later. Thanks. -- Barbu Paul - Gheorghe Common sense is not so common - Voltaire Visit My GitHub profile to see my open-source projects - https://github.com/paullik
Re: [dev] Migration to git
there goes the 'less' part Pozdrawiam, Łukasz Gruner 2012/11/29 Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net: Greetings comrades, the migration to git is nearly complete. What’s missing is your tests that everything works as expected. Projects can be accessed via: http://git.suckless.org/$name git://git.suckless.org/$name Beware that the wiki can only be pushed to via: git://git.suckless.org/sites For SSH: ssh://u...@suckless.org/gitrepos/$name I tried to change all references in the wiki to the old hg repositories. If you find any I missed, please change it and push the changes to the sites repository. Thanks. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann
Re: [dev] Migration to git
Quick question - A long time ago I asked if it was possible to clone _all_ the hg repositories without having to manually specify them from the suckless site. The answer I got was no. With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the suckless repositories in one fell sweep? This can be done easily with submodules. Both, git and hg, have support for them, it is only necessary build the repository with the definition of the submodules.
Re: [dev] Migration to git
rofl On 11/29/12, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote: Quick question - A long time ago I asked if it was possible to clone _all_ the hg repositories without having to manually specify them from the suckless site. The answer I got was no. With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the suckless repositories in one fell sweep? This can be done easily with submodules. Both, git and hg, have support for them, it is only necessary build the repository with the definition of the submodules.
Re: [dev] Migration to git
Greetings. On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:48:17 +0100 uki uka...@gmail.com wrote: there goes the 'less' part Pozdrawiam, Łukasz Gruner You must have had a wrong definition of »suckless« long before this hap‐ pened, if you think using a prototyping language for many years without replacing it »sucks less«. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann
Re: [dev] Migration to git
(with apologies for screwing up threading slightly) Thanks Christoph, looks good. One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Can these be migrated too? It'd be useful. Nick
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On 29 November 2012 16:01, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote: (with apologies for screwing up threading slightly) Thanks Christoph, looks good. One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Can these be migrated too? It'd be useful. You're doing something wrong then, I get the tags just fine. -- Daniel
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:09:35PM +0200, Daniel Bainton wrote: On 29 November 2012 16:01, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote: Thanks Christoph, looks good. One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Can these be migrated too? It'd be useful. You're doing something wrong then, I get the tags just fine. Oh, really? I'm doing this: git clone http://git.suckless.org/surf cd surf git tag Which results in no output (I expected the list of tags). What should I be doing?
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On 29/11/12 14:01 ;+, Nick wrote: One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Seems to work fine for me: tony@morpheus ~ $ git clone git://git.suckless.org/surf Cloning into 'surf'... remote: Counting objects: 880, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (497/497), done. remote: Total 880 (delta 382), reused 880 (delta 382) Receiving objects: 100% (880/880), 670.25 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (382/382), done. tony@morpheus ~ $ cd surf/ tony@morpheus ~/surf $ git tag -n 0.1 dist doesn't work. fixing Makefile. 0.1.1 bugfix release 0.1.2 next will be 0.1.2 0.2 fixing double calling functions from contextmenu. 0.3 changing SETPROP()-macro 0.4 Adding Nibbles patch 0.4.1 next will be 0.4.1 0.5 Change horizontal scrolling to ^u and ^i, remove ^g scrolling. -- Anthony Cox
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +, Anthony Cox wrote: On 29/11/12 14:01 ;+, Nick wrote: One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Seems to work fine for me: tony@morpheus ~ $ git clone git://git.suckless.org/surf Hmm, I wonder if it's the http transport, then... FWIW I'm using the git on debian stable, 1.7.2.5. And I'm behind a stupid firewall that forbids git://
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On 29 November 2012 16:19, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +, Anthony Cox wrote: On 29/11/12 14:01 ;+, Nick wrote: One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Seems to work fine for me: tony@morpheus ~ $ git clone git://git.suckless.org/surf Hmm, I wonder if it's the http transport, then... FWIW I'm using the git on debian stable, 1.7.2.5. And I'm behind a stupid firewall that forbids git:// Ah yes, that's it, tested with http and the tags won't get synced for me. -- Daniel
Re: [dev] Migration to git
the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running git update-server-info after every commit? this is used to update the http information with the .git database.. On 11/29/12 15:20, Daniel Bainton wrote: On 29 November 2012 16:19, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +, Anthony Cox wrote: On 29/11/12 14:01 ;+, Nick wrote: One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Seems to work fine for me: tony@morpheus ~ $ git clone git://git.suckless.org/surf Hmm, I wonder if it's the http transport, then... FWIW I'm using the git on debian stable, 1.7.2.5. And I'm behind a stupid firewall that forbids git:// Ah yes, that's it, tested with http and the tags won't get synced for me. -- Daniel
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On 11/29/2012 02:25 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Greetings comrades, Hello! the migration to git is nearly complete. What’s missing is your tests that everything works as expected. Now I have a question: How can be pathes for dwm be managerd via git? I mean I need a patch queue somehow, I'm thinking branches, I'll create a local branch with my patches applied and I will hack through its history. What are you guys suggesting/using? -- Barbu Paul - Gheorghe Common sense is not so common - Voltaire Visit My GitHub profile to see my open-source projects - https://github.com/paullik
Re: [dev] Migration to git
How can be pathes for dwm be managerd via git? I mean I need a patch queue somehow, I'm thinking branches, I'll create a local branch with my patches applied and I will hack through its history. I usually work in this way. After generate the patch sequence I get the diff with git format-patch and send them to the list, although now can be used git send-email to. When the patches are applied in the main branch I join my branch with the master branch with git rebase (I fetch the changes with git fetch before, but it can be done in only one step with git pull --rebase, but usually I prefer see the exact state of the repository before rebase the master branch). Best regards,
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:33:23PM +0200, Barbu Paul - Gheorghe wrote: On 11/29/2012 02:25 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Now I have a question: How can be patches for dwm be managed via git? I mean I need a patch queue somehow, I'm thinking branches, I'll create a local branch with my patches applied and I will hack through its history. What are you guys suggesting/using? I imagine you can keep your own local branch, and rebase it upon suckless' master branch, when it changes. Cheers, Rob
Re: [dev] Migration to git
you can still use mercurial, with it's hg-git extension, I sometimes had small problems with it on huge repositories at work, never had any problem with open source projects (maybe it's the size or less of 'do whatever' attitude) Pozdrawiam, Łukasz Gruner 2012/11/29 Barbu Paul - Gheorghe barbu.paul.gheor...@gmail.com: On 11/29/2012 02:25 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Greetings comrades, Hello! the migration to git is nearly complete. What’s missing is your tests that everything works as expected. Now I have a question: How can be pathes for dwm be managerd via git? I mean I need a patch queue somehow, I'm thinking branches, I'll create a local branch with my patches applied and I will hack through its history. What are you guys suggesting/using? -- Barbu Paul - Gheorghe Common sense is not so common - Voltaire Visit My GitHub profile to see my open-source projects - https://github.com/paullik
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On 28 November 2012 19:25, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote: Greetings comrades, the migration to git is nearly complete. What’s missing is your tests that everything works as expected. Projects can be accessed via: http://git.suckless.org/$name git://git.suckless.org/$name Beware that the wiki can only be pushed to via: git://git.suckless.org/sites For SSH: ssh://u...@suckless.org/gitrepos/$name I tried to change all references in the wiki to the old hg repositories. If you find any I missed, please change it and push the changes to the sites repository. Thanks. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann Quick question - A long time ago I asked if it was possible to clone _all_ the hg repositories without having to manually specify them from the suckless site. The answer I got was no. With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the suckless repositories in one fell sweep? Calvin
Re: [dev] Migration to git
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:13:11PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote: With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the suckless repositories in one fell sweep? for repo in foo bar baz; do git clone git://some.server/$repo; done This is about as 'one fell sweep' as it's going to get.
