Jenkins build became unstable: SystemML-DailyTest #1249

2017-09-21 Thread jenkins
See

Re: [DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Matthias Boehm
I pretty much agree with Niketan and Deron. In general, it would be useful to provide an R API as well. However, I'm a bit concerned for two reasons: * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be willing

Re: [DISCUSS] R-Interface to SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Deron Eriksson
I agree with Niketan. An R interface definitely makes sense for SystemML. DML itself is based on R, so it's surprising we have Java/Scala/Python interfaces to SystemML but we don't have an R interface. Perhaps R4ML committers could supply a little more info? For instance: 1) Would they like to

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
Answers: * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be willing to maintain and extend it? ALOK: We will doing development into it . there are open PR already. * Providing wrappers for our algorithm

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread Deron Eriksson
> > * Looking over the github repo, apparently R4ML is not under active > development/maintenance anymore (last commit Jul 20). So who would be > willing to maintain and extend it? > > ALOK: We will doing development into it . there are open PR already. > > No commits since Jul 20 does raise

Re: [PROPOSAL] R4ML Integration with SystemML

2017-09-21 Thread alok singh
Hi   We (me and Brendan) has been focusing on other things  like journeys apart from new MLCtx changes. R4ML commits and PR you can also review, I think code will definitely be maintained. Alok From: Deron Eriksson Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 6:03 PM To:

Jenkins build is back to stable : SystemML-DailyTest #1248

2017-09-21 Thread jenkins
See