Re: DML in Zeppelin

cells - scalar types (booleans, strings, floats, integers) and matrices -- Any variable defined in a cell can be used (read from/written to) in subsequent cells. -- This is very similar to how spark cells operate. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Nakul Jindal On Tue

DML in Zeppelin

the screenshots: http://i.imgur.com/NttMuKC.gifv Instructions: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/6ab8c569b2360232e252 JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-542 Nakul Jindal

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.13.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 Basic sanity tests pass on Mac. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > +1 > > Performed the following validations for artifacts at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > 13.0-incubating-rc2/ > : > > 1. -bin.tgz/-bin.zip

Re: Proof of Concept: Embedded Scala DSL

As I understand it, the way it is now is the following: { PyDML, DML }——> ANTLR AST (org.apache.sysml.parser.dml, org.apache.sysml.parser.pydml) ——> Legacy AST (DMLProgram, Expression, ForStatement…) ——> HOPS ——> LOPS ——> Runtime Niketan’s embedded Python DSL ——> PyDML Felix’s embedded

Re: Building a community around SystemML

Hi Dhiren, Welcome to SystemML! I would encourage you to go through some of these lectures which explain the internals of SystemML - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64bnyFR5em0=PL9U7gw7DOIGhdiKZkMAqNPIDywFMlzCaY

Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

Niketan, Berthold, Matthias, Sasha - Any thoughts? Thanks, Nakul Jindal

Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas

+1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of SystemML being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng worked on. -Nakul On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers wrote: > +1

Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

erations. > > This leaves us with two options here: (1) you could use an external > (java-implemented) function, which gives you virtually the same runtime > behavior but a clear separation via an explicit registration, or (2) add > it to the list of CP-only operations (with a

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

+1 On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Acs S wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version > 0.11.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

Basic sanity tests pasts on MacOS following the process here: http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/release-process.html#all-binaries-execute (The in-memory jar was removed by [SYSTEMML-741]) +1 Nakul Jindal On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:18 PM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

+1 On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version > 0.11.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

+1 On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Glenn Weidner wrote: > Validated RC4 binaries on Windows environment: > http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/release- > process.html#all-binaries-execute > > --Glenn > > [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan

Re: GSoc 2017

rishnakaly...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Hello Nakul, >> My comments in Italics below. >> >>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Nakul Jindal <naku...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Krishna, >>> >>> Here are some questions/remarks i have

Re: Error while building SystemML from source

Try doing a mvn clean package The "mvn clean install" is triggering the "verify" phase which we use for our integration tests. For the integration tests, you'll need to have "Rscript" installed along with the appropriate R packages. Also, the temporary directory the tests write to, need to

Re: GSoC : Getting started contributions

Hi Krishna, What Arvind is describing is in essence a large part of you GSoC proposal. You should work on this if and when your proposal gets approved. (we don't know whether it has been approved and even if we did, we couldn't say). In the meantime, I encourage you to play around with SystemML,

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML Graduation

+1 Thank you Luciano for starting this discussion and the guidance you've provided on this project. In addition to the aforementioned accomplishments of the project, the roadmap (which has been on the mailing list) also directs us towards making continued healthy progress. Nakul Jindal On Fri

Re: Dropping Java 6 and 7 support

+1 -Nakul On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:13 AM, wrote: > +1 > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Niketan Pansare wrote: > > >

Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

I like option (2) as well. It is difficult for a new contributor to know the URL for the Jenkins server. In so far as this may be considered spam, I would suggest that this can be controlled using the notification settings on github and filters on your email server/client. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove old MLContext API

+1 Nakul On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 5:37 PM, wrote: > +1 > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On May 1, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Niketan Pansare wrote: > > > >

Re: [NOTICE] New Apache SystemML Committer and PPMC Member

Welcome, Felix! -Nakul On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Felix! > > Deron > > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:27 PM, wrote: > > > Welcome, Felix! > > > > -- > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > GitHub:

Re: SYSTEMML-1451: Performance Regression Tests

Hi Krishna, I think the intention is to compare the performance to previous versions of systemml. We can add a csv or excel file that contains performance info from previous versions to the repo and whena performance test is run, new numbers from the performance run can be added into that

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating (RC4)

+1 Ran the performance suite on an IBM internal cluster. Most tests seem to perform reasonably close to the previous release. -Nakul On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Matthias Boehm wrote: > this regression is certainly something to look into but this release >

New Google Summer of Code 2017 Student - Krishna Kalyan

Hi All, Let us all welcome Krishna Kalyan as a student of Google Summer of Code to work on SystemML. He will be working on automating the performance testing process of SystemML. His project proposal is attached and the JIRA tracking his project can be found at