Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0
+1. Definitely time for another release; the 0.10 code is pretty stale relative to what's available on the trunk. Fred From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 09/21/2016 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 +1 Deron On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Niketan Pansare <npan...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 for 0.11 release > > Thanks > > Niketan > > > On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:39 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > I would agree to most of the part except that there would be need to > have SystemML support on Spark 2.0 for "Spark As A Service" (or DSX). I > haven't seen formal request for Spark 2.0 support from SAAS/DSX team yet, > but I heard they are targeting 09/30. In such situation, I would like to > prioritize SystemML support on Spark 2.0 around same time as 0.11 release. > > -Arvind > > > > From: Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:07 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Glenn > > > > Berthold Reinwald---09/19/2016 09:52:26 PM---+1. I'd even consider not > fixing old MLContext releated issues. > > > > From: Berthold Reinwald/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Date: 09/19/2016 09:52 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 > > > > > > > > +1. > > > > I'd even consider not fixing old MLContext releated issues. > > > > Regards, > > Berthold Reinwald > > IBM Almaden Research Center > > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 > > e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > > To: dev <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> > > Date: 09/19/2016 08:21 PM > > Subject:[DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > we already discussed and agreed that it would be good to make our next > > release relatively soon. However, there was also a discussion around > > making > > the major 1.0 release but this would require substantially more time > > because it is our opportunity to remove APIs and cleanup the language. > > > > I'd like to propose the following: let's release a 0.11 release in the > > next > > couple of weeks, targeting at Spark 1.x including the old and new > > MLContext > > APIs as well as both file-based and frame-based transform. Subsequently, > > we > > can focus on our major 1.0 release, including the support for Spark 2.x, > > the removal of the old MLContext API, and the removal of the file-based > > transform functionalities. Hopefully we get compression and GPU support > > into production-ready state until the 1.0 release too. > > > > The next step would be to collect open issues for the 0.11 release. From > > my > > perspective, this should mostly center around documentation, robustness > > and > > performance of the new MLContext API and frame support as well as the > > simplification of our build process. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0
+1 for 0.11 release Thanks Niketan > On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:39 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > I would agree to most of the part except that there would be need to have > SystemML support on Spark 2.0 for "Spark As A Service" (or DSX). I haven't > seen formal request for Spark 2.0 support from SAAS/DSX team yet, but I heard > they are targeting 09/30. In such situation, I would like to prioritize > SystemML support on Spark 2.0 around same time as 0.11 release. > -Arvind > > From: Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:07 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 > > +1 > > Thanks, > Glenn > > Berthold Reinwald---09/19/2016 09:52:26 PM---+1. I'd even consider not fixing > old MLContext releated issues. > > From: Berthold Reinwald/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 09/19/2016 09:52 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 > > > > +1. > > I'd even consider not fixing old MLContext releated issues. > > Regards, > Berthold Reinwald > IBM Almaden Research Center > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 > e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > To: dev <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> > Date: 09/19/2016 08:21 PM > Subject:[DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 > > > > > > Hi all, > > we already discussed and agreed that it would be good to make our next > release relatively soon. However, there was also a discussion around > making > the major 1.0 release but this would require substantially more time > because it is our opportunity to remove APIs and cleanup the language. > > I'd like to propose the following: let's release a 0.11 release in the > next > couple of weeks, targeting at Spark 1.x including the old and new > MLContext > APIs as well as both file-based and frame-based transform. Subsequently, > we > can focus on our major 1.0 release, including the support for Spark 2.x, > the removal of the old MLContext API, and the removal of the file-based > transform functionalities. Hopefully we get compression and GPU support > into production-ready state until the 1.0 release too. > > The next step would be to collect open issues for the 0.11 release. From > my > perspective, this should mostly center around documentation, robustness > and > performance of the new MLContext API and frame support as well as the > simplification of our build process. > > Regards, > Matthias > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0
I would agree to most of the part except that there would be need to have SystemML support on Spark 2.0 for "Spark As A Service" (or DSX). I haven't seen formal request for Spark 2.0 support from SAAS/DSX team yet, but I heard they are targeting 09/30. In such situation, I would like to prioritize SystemML support on Spark 2.0 around same time as 0.11 release. -Arvind From: Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:07 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 +1 Thanks, Glenn Berthold Reinwald---09/19/2016 09:52:26 PM---+1. I'd even consider not fixing old MLContext releated issues. From: Berthold Reinwald/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 09/19/2016 09:52 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 +1. I'd even consider not fixing old MLContext releated issues. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden Research Center office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> Date: 09/19/2016 08:21 PM Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 Hi all, we already discussed and agreed that it would be good to make our next release relatively soon. However, there was also a discussion around making the major 1.0 release but this would require substantially more time because it is our opportunity to remove APIs and cleanup the language. I'd like to propose the following: let's release a 0.11 release in the next couple of weeks, targeting at Spark 1.x including the old and new MLContext APIs as well as both file-based and frame-based transform. Subsequently, we can focus on our major 1.0 release, including the support for Spark 2.x, the removal of the old MLContext API, and the removal of the file-based transform functionalities. Hopefully we get compression and GPU support into production-ready state until the 1.0 release too. The next step would be to collect open issues for the 0.11 release. From my perspective, this should mostly center around documentation, robustness and performance of the new MLContext API and frame support as well as the simplification of our build process. Regards, Matthias
Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0
+1 Thanks, Glenn From: Berthold Reinwald/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 09/19/2016 09:52 PM Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 +1. I'd even consider not fixing old MLContext releated issues. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden Research Center office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> Date: 09/19/2016 08:21 PM Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 Hi all, we already discussed and agreed that it would be good to make our next release relatively soon. However, there was also a discussion around making the major 1.0 release but this would require substantially more time because it is our opportunity to remove APIs and cleanup the language. I'd like to propose the following: let's release a 0.11 release in the next couple of weeks, targeting at Spark 1.x including the old and new MLContext APIs as well as both file-based and frame-based transform. Subsequently, we can focus on our major 1.0 release, including the support for Spark 2.x, the removal of the old MLContext API, and the removal of the file-based transform functionalities. Hopefully we get compression and GPU support into production-ready state until the 1.0 release too. The next step would be to collect open issues for the 0.11 release. From my perspective, this should mostly center around documentation, robustness and performance of the new MLContext API and frame support as well as the simplification of our build process. Regards, Matthias
Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0
+1. I'd even consider not fixing old MLContext releated issues. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden Research Center office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> Date: 09/19/2016 08:21 PM Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 Hi all, we already discussed and agreed that it would be good to make our next release relatively soon. However, there was also a discussion around making the major 1.0 release but this would require substantially more time because it is our opportunity to remove APIs and cleanup the language. I'd like to propose the following: let's release a 0.11 release in the next couple of weeks, targeting at Spark 1.x including the old and new MLContext APIs as well as both file-based and frame-based transform. Subsequently, we can focus on our major 1.0 release, including the support for Spark 2.x, the removal of the old MLContext API, and the removal of the file-based transform functionalities. Hopefully we get compression and GPU support into production-ready state until the 1.0 release too. The next step would be to collect open issues for the 0.11 release. From my perspective, this should mostly center around documentation, robustness and performance of the new MLContext API and frame support as well as the simplification of our build process. Regards, Matthias
[DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0
Hi all, we already discussed and agreed that it would be good to make our next release relatively soon. However, there was also a discussion around making the major 1.0 release but this would require substantially more time because it is our opportunity to remove APIs and cleanup the language. I'd like to propose the following: let's release a 0.11 release in the next couple of weeks, targeting at Spark 1.x including the old and new MLContext APIs as well as both file-based and frame-based transform. Subsequently, we can focus on our major 1.0 release, including the support for Spark 2.x, the removal of the old MLContext API, and the removal of the file-based transform functionalities. Hopefully we get compression and GPU support into production-ready state until the 1.0 release too. The next step would be to collect open issues for the 0.11 release. From my perspective, this should mostly center around documentation, robustness and performance of the new MLContext API and frame support as well as the simplification of our build process. Regards, Matthias
