[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-11-17 Thread jeking3
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 Since it's just documentation if you want to add it as a patch to a ticket instead of putting it through CI, someone can merge it from there. ---

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-11-16 Thread dcelasun
Github user dcelasun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 > That needs to be documented in the dlang readme - would you be able to document that in a separate PR? Sorry for the delay. I'll open a ticket and send a patch over the weekend. ---

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-11-03 Thread jeking3
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 Excellent, I will merge this, and we'll get it into 0.11.0 - so yay! We can consider the backwards-compatible construction adapter to be deprecated so that it can be removed in the follow-on

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-11-03 Thread dcelasun
Github user dcelasun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 @jeking3 All done! I think we are good to merge, what do you think? ---

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-26 Thread jeking3
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 0.11.0 cycle hasn't started yet - you still have some time (I don't know how much). ---

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-18 Thread dcelasun
Github user dcelasun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 @jeking3 Is there a deadline for 0.11? I really want to get this into the next release, but likely won't have enough time to finish it up in the next week or so. ---

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-10 Thread jeking3
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 Given the backlog on the project, I don't blame you! :) ---

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-10 Thread dcelasun
Github user dcelasun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 > Is there a way you can provide a generated NewFooClientFactory as an adapter to run the new code? It would require putting back some of the generated code, but I'll try to find a way. I

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-10 Thread dcelasun
Github user dcelasun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 ping @jeking3 ---

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-02 Thread dcelasun
Github user dcelasun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 > I don't think we can unilaterally require go 1.9 at this point without causing some pain, but I'm not sure. This change doesn't effect the user, it's only needed for the tests. Though

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-02 Thread jeking3
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 We support go back to version 1.2.1 or 1.4.3 (I can't remember which, but I think 1.2.1 is on trusty). That said, I'm in the middle of reworking the docker images to be as stock as possible, and

[GitHub] thrift issue #1382: THRIFT-4285 Move TX/RX methods from gen. code to library

2017-10-02 Thread dcelasun
Github user dcelasun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1382 Travis failure is unrelated, all Go tests are green. cc @jeking3 thoughts? ---