[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Dale reassigned TINKERPOP-1692:
--
Assignee: Robert Dale
> Bump to Neo4j 3.2.3
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Dale closed TINKERPOP-1692.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Bump to Neo4j 3.2.3
> ---
>
> Key:
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/705
That dependency cycle is bad. It should probably be put in `gremlin-test`.
Maybe even make it a [Graph
Feature](http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#_features) -
Cloning.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167759#comment-16167759
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/705
At this point I'd be -1 if we turned this into a "feature". I only thought
of this as a convenience to TinkerGraph. As I mentioned before I really don't
see why a `clone()` would make sense in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1772.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Seems like we can close this one as a non-issue at this
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715
Using the modern graph:
```
gremlin> g.V().emit().repeat(both()).times(3).limit(15).path()
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1],v[3]]
==>[v[1],v[2]]
==>[v[1],v[4]]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168044#comment-16168044
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1783:
---
So TinkerPop's "PageRank" is not the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1717.
---
Resolution: Done
Assignee: stephen mallette
Fix Version/s: 3.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168044#comment-16168044
]
Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP-1783 at 9/15/17 3:47 PM:
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715
It's not. It can't be unrolled, since I'm using emit().
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168407#comment-16168407
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1783:
---
I implemented the "teleporation energy"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168407#comment-16168407
]
Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP-1783 at 9/15/17 7:55 PM:
Github user mpollmeier commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715
That's likely because of the RepeatUnrollStrategy, which kicks in when
there's a foreseeable number of iterations. Needs to be changed as well I
guess.
-Original Message-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168407#comment-16168407
]
Marko A. Rodriguez edited comment on TINKERPOP-1783 at 9/15/17 7:58 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167499#comment-16167499
]
Artem Aliev commented on TINKERPOP-1783:
The work around I proposed is incorrect.
The correct
17 matches
Mail list logo
