[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 Ok cool if we're all ok with the new features then I'm satisfied. Code looked good as well VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 @newkek I understand. I like the `@value` concept -- its the JSON sub-object for creating the object (defined by `@type`). VOTE +1. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 I'm waiting to hear back from marko on the points he brought up to cast my vote :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i` - still going through code though. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user newkek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 I just pushed corrected docs, and renamed everything "domain" to "namespace". Waiting for more consensus to change the default gremlin namespace. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 Still reviewing I would like to finish going through the code :) will try and do this later in the day. But looking good so far --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 is that an official +1 from you @PommeVerte or are you still reviewing ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 I'm liking how this has turned out. I personally don't have much of an opinion in regards to assuming gremlin is the default namespace and getting rid of `g:` though it does have the merit of being self documenting. I don't know how much of a size difference this would represent. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 I think I agree with @newkek to push that off until we can get his massive PR reviewed/merged. Let's see if we can solve that separately. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user newkek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 A remark: @okram requested `TraversalExplanation` to be included in the list of Graph objects. I've noticed that the current `TraversalExplanation` Graphson serializer serializes a `Traversal`. In order to follow the requirement of this GraphSON2.0 type system, we would have to write a deserializer for the `TraversalExplanation` (there isn't currently). However, the current 1.0 serializer serializes the Traversal as the `toString()` of the Traversal's step list, which means that it is not possible to deserialize to a Traversal with only such info. So I believe it would be more appropriate to wait for TP1278 before implementing the `TraversalExplanation` ser/de and leave it out of the scope of this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #386: TINKERPOP-1274: GraphSON 2.0 [revised]
Github user newkek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/386 *NB: the conflicts for merge are caused by the CHANGELOG* --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
