[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #425: Fixed behavior of has() methods
Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/425 good: "all `has()` method overloads behave like before" All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i` VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #425: Fixed behavior of has() methods
Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/425 Docs were clear, change is straightforward and tested this manually: VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #425: Fixed behavior of has() methods
Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/425 Please adapt your "INFO" email to dev into the Upgrade Docs. I think it's important to explain the history of what happened here for 3.2.3 as we missed the change for the Upgrade Docs in 3.2.2. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---