I am using mod_jk 1.2.15.
It set if to workers.properties.
---
worker.ap1.type=ajp13
worker.ap1.host=192.168.0.3
worker.ap1.port=8009
worker.ap1.recovery_options=0 or 3
worker.ap1.retries=1
worker.ap1.reply_timeout=3
---
I set reply_timeout=3(30sec) by mod_jk1.2.15.
And, The JSP page
I'm trying to update the build script for 5.0
Has anyone seen this, it seems the 'get' in ant downloads a corrupt file,
while the browser or command line tools get it right.
ie.
project
target name='b'
get dest=ant-mx4j.tar.gz src=${src}/
/target
/project
$ ant -f b.xml
Costin Manolache wrote:
Well, long time ago CharChunk and ByteChunk were supposed to be just an
implementation
detail of MessageBytes - which was supposed to hide the detail of chars and
bytes and avoid the strings.
But they were supposed to work together, and stay kind of consistent.
I am not
All -
Apologies in advance if this should go to tomcat-users but I'm
suspecting a problem with the way the source code is being distributed
so I'm starting here.
I downloaded the source file for 5.5.15 and built it. After installing
it I ran bin/version.sh which said I had version 5.5.0.0. Not
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Feb 13 09:33:22 2006
New Revision: 377432
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377432view=rev
Log:
Infrastructure for a group layer, this is the way to abstract away membership
and replication logic from the cluster object, as the cluster object, the
replication valve
Eric Lenio wrote:
All -
Apologies in advance if this should go to tomcat-users but I'm
suspecting a problem with the way the source code is being distributed
so I'm starting here.
I downloaded the source file for 5.5.15 and built it. After installing
it I ran bin/version.sh which said I
OK thanks for the tip. Is there a document that goes into detail
on this?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:35:42PM +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Eric Lenio wrote:
All -
Apologies in advance if this should go to tomcat-users but I'm
suspecting a problem with the way the source code is being
Kevin McCormack wrote:
Possible Fix?
==
I looked through the Tomcat 5.5.12 source code and ended up in the
org.apache.catalina.authentication.FormAuthenticator class and noticed
that there is no code there to save the request parameters from the
original request into the saved
Eric Lenio wrote:
OK thanks for the tip. Is there a document that goes into detail
on this?
BUILDING.TXT and http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/building.html
are the main documents. Documentation patches are always welcome.
Mark
Hello, what do you want to mean when you say this question belongs as
per? I can't find it. Could you please me tell me the full url?
Thanks in advance.
Mark Thomas escribió:
Ángel Prieto wrote:
Hello, I'm having some problems with apache+tomcat with this configuration:
Could anyone tell
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Feb 13 13:04:20 2006
New Revision: 377486
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377486view=rev
Log:
Use constants instead of hard coding values
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/mcast/McastService.java
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Feb 13 13:10:41 2006
New Revision: 377488
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377488view=rev
Log:
oops, use the correct values
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/mcast/McastService.java
Modified:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Feb 13 13:39:52 2006
New Revision: 377499
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377499view=rev
Log:
more code cleanup
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp/ReplicationTransmitter.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38637.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Is that correct that you use now at McastService the same constant?
Before it was start(1) and start(2)
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 13.02.2006 um 22:04 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Feb 13 13:04:20 2006
New Revision: 377486
URL:
Ohh,
I see you have later correct this past bug. Thanks!
Are your current big changes not a very high risk to break the
cluster functionaliy again?
Why we not going inside a branch or a cluster2 module? Currently a
lot of user work very successfully with the tomcat 5.5.15 cluster. It
was
Eric Lenio wrote:
All -
Apologies in advance if this should go to tomcat-users but I'm
suspecting a problem with the way the source code is being distributed
so I'm starting here.
I downloaded the source file for 5.5.15 and built it. After installing
it I ran bin/version.sh which said I had
17 matches
Mail list logo
