Re: non blocking API

Thanks Remy, /Filip On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:05, Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 16:59 -0600, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: >> I posted some feedback to the expert group: >> >> http://java.net/projects/servlet-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-06/message/15

Re: Unit tests and trunk

additional software layer. I'm sure there will be more bug reports as more people turn to java 7 on windows/hardware Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2012, at 16:42, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 11/07/2012 23:30, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: >> I wasn't able to reproduce on a Win

Re: access to build environment

I'd guess those two, do we use anything else for tomcat ci? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2012, at 16:42, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 11/07/2012 23:40, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: >> How do I get access to the build environment? > > Which build environment? Gump, buil

Re: Review Request: Proposed fix for BZ 50903

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/500/#review328 --- I think the entire solution is over complicated. Not a fan of introducin

Re: Tomcat JDBC Pool memory leak when using StatementFinalizer interceptor

hi Martin, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > Hi, (moving to developers list) > > any ideas on the problem below? This thing is kind of itching me :-) > > So I instrumented the "StatementFinalizer" class with some logging and > learned that over time a few instances of t

Re: Tomcat JDBC Pool memory leak when using StatementFinalizer interceptor

ri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Filip Hanik wrote: > > > >> hi Martin, > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Martin Knoblauch > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, (moving to developers list) > >> > > >> > any ideas

Re: For review: EncryptInterceptor for Cluster/Tribes

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:05 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > All, > > Can I get a technical review for (a) appropriateness and (b) technical > implementation of the attached cluster interceptor? Let's assume for

Re: svn commit: r1644737 - /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/systemprops.xml

Mr Schultz, nothing prevents you from removing the spaces if you at the same time fix the formatting or provide a solution to it. I do agree, that the spaces in the code for the sake of formatting is pretty lame, as it makes for erroneous copy/paste. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mark Thomas w

Re: Native Image - Reflectionless Concept

We've had some discussions around this, mostly high level about where this could go. At this point, anyone strongly opposed to ship a light weight jar? Do we feel the value is or is not there compared to the maintenance of it? Filip On 7/13/20 2:59 PM, Filip Hanik wrote: for discu

RE: [tomcat] branch master updated: Avoid reflection for default instantiation

spic.AuthConfig > FactoryImpl")) > > { > > Why not use AuthConfigFactoryImpl.class.getName()? It may help in the > future with refactoring. [Filip Hanik] Trying to avoid a circular dependency. You see the javax/jakarta package should not import org.apache.catalina code

RE: [tomcat] branch master updated: Simpler way to determine Graal runtime

r48%3D&reserved=0> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 098c4c8 Simpler way to determine Graal runtime 098c4c8 is described below commit 098c4c81602ba1e8d5f33b0795d7caf55f70d573 Author: Filip Hanik mailto:fha...@pivotal.io>> AuthorDate:

Re: [tomcat] branch master updated: Simpler way to determine Graal runtime

Good idea, I’ll add that as a separate commit. On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 13:08 Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:17 PM Filip Hanik wrote: > >> Thanks Remy, >> >> >> >> I ran into some failures when running the test suite using the substra

RE: [tomcat] branch master updated: Simpler way to determine Graal runtime

ge. If I understand it correctly, the substrate VM doesn't pick up those substitutions when running in Java mode. Filip > > Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:17, Filip Hanik <mailto:fha...@vmware.com> > a écrit : > > > Thanks Remy, > > > > I ra

Re: [tomcat] 02/02: Avoid reflection for default instantiation

From: Martin Grigorov Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 2:29 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [tomcat] 02/02: Avoid reflection for default instantiation +public class AprStatus { +private static volatile boolean aprInitialized = false; +p

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the functional specs from docs webapp

+1 On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:46 Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose removing all the functional spec pages from the > documentation web application. > > My reasoning for this proposal is, in short, that we aren't using or > maintaining these pages. > > I don't recall any discus

Next release

Our cadence seems fairly predictable. Any thoughts on the timeline of the on the next batch of releases? Filip

Re: Next release

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:15 Mark Thomas wrote: > On 26/08/2020 17:12, Filip Hanik wrote: > > > Our cadence seems fairly predictable. > > > > > > Any thoughts on the timeline of the on the next batch of releases? > > > > I skipped the August r

Re: Next release

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:12 Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Filip Hanik wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:15 Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 26/08/2020 17:12, Filip Hanik wrote: >>> >>> > Our cadenc

Re: Next release

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 07:44 Mark Thomas wrote: > > > On 27/08/2020 14:15, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:26 AM Filip Hanik > > <mailto:fi...@hanik.com>> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:12 Rémy Mauchera

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.58

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.58 On 9/10/20, 15:10, "Mark Thomas" wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.58 release is now available for voting. The notable changes compared to the 8.5.57 release are: - For requests containing the Expect: 100-continue header, optiona

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 9.0.38

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.38 On 9/10/20, 05:58, "Keiichi Fujino" wrote: 2020年9月10日(木) 18:03 Mark Thomas : > The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.38 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to the 9.0.37 release are: > > - For reques

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M8

X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.0.0-M8 On 9/10/20, 05:57, "Keiichi Fujino" wrote: 2020年9月9日(水) 23:57 Mark Thomas : > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M8 release is now available for > voting. > > Apache Tomcat 10.x implements Jakarta EE 9 and, as such, the primary

Re: Plans for Servlet 5.1

On 9/10/20, 01:17, "Mark Thomas" wrote: Hi all, It looks like at least one of the specs Tomcat implements, Servlets, is going to have at least one release between Jakarta EE 9 / Servlet 5.0 / Tomcat 10.0 and Jakarta EE 10/ Servlet 6.0 / Tomcat 10.1 The current plan is for

Re: Deprecated JDBCRealm

Easy choice. +1 On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:53 Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > > > I'd like to proposed the following: > > - Deprecated the JDBCRealm in 7.0.x, 8.5.x and 9.0.x > > - Remove the JDBCRealm in 10.0.x > > > > The reasons for this are: > > - The JDBCRealm is single threaded > > - The Dat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M9

[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.0.0-M9 On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 06:45 Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M9 release is now available for > voting. > > Apache Tomcat 10.x implements Jakarta EE 9 and, as such, the primary > package for all the specification APIs has cha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 9.0.39

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.39 On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 07:49 Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.39 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to the 9.0.38 release are: > > - Refactor the handling of closed HTTP/2 streams to reduce the heap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.59

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.59 On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 10:34 Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.59 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to the 8.5.58 release are: > > - Refactor the handling of closed HTTP/2 streams to reduce the heap

Re: Removing JDBC mode from JDBCStore

+1 On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 05:45 Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > As part of https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/376 and along with the > similar removal of JDBCRealm, I would like to propose: > - Remove JDBC code from JDBCStore in Tomcat 10, in favor of DataSource > code; this allows simplifyin

Re: Tomcat 10.0.x and Jakarta 9 TCK status

Thanks for the update. Good work! On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:07 Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that the final versions of the TCKs for Jakarta 9 are available I've > been running them against the current 10.0.x (effectively 10.0.0-M10). > > The results can be summarised as: > > Expression

Re: Removal of author tags in trunk

5 * @author Craig McClanahan >> 194 * @author Craig R. McClanahan >>2 * @author Craig R. McClanahan >>3 * @author Dan Milstein >> 18 * @author Dan Sandberg >>4 * @author Danno Ferrin >> 16 * @author David

Re: Special requirements on session id generator

regardless of the use case, a debate whether to make something pluggable or extensible c(sh)ould be short. adding pluggability/extensibility that doesn't change default behavior can actually leave the exact use case out of the question. On Friday, February 14, 2014, Konstantin Preißer wrote: > H

Re: Request line parsing

+1 Thorough and clear write up On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 06:01 Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently looking at the request line parsing. I'll try and set out > each issue in turn. > > End of line parsing > === > > Prior to the recent changes, Tomcat allowed CRLF or LF to ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M6

[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M6 (alpha) On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 5:31 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M6 release is now available for > voting. > > Applications that run on Tomcat 9 and earlier will not run on Tomcat 10 > without changes. Java EE applicatio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 10.0.12

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.0.12 (stable) On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 6:59 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.0.12 release is now available for > voting. > > Apache Tomcat 10.x implements Jakarta EE 9 and, as such, the primary > package for all the specification APIs h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 9.0.54

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.54 (stable) On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:25 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.54 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to 9.0.54 are: > > - Further robustness improvements to HTTP/2 flow control window

Re: [tomcat] branch 10.0.x updated: Add compilation support for Graal 21.3

From: Mark Thomas Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:49 AM To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: [tomcat] branch 10.0.x updated: Add compilation support for Graal 21.3 On 10/01/2022 17:45, fha...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dua

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 10.0.1

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.0.1 (stable) On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 8:29 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 27/01/2021 15:08, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > The proposed 10.0.1 release is: > > [ ] Broken - do not release > > [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 10.0.1 (beta) > > [X] Stable - go ahead

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 9.0.42

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.42 On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 9:40 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.42 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to the 9.0.41 release are: > > - Add support for using Unix domain sockets for NIO when running

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.63

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.63 On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:43 Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.63 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to the 8.5.61 release are: > > - Add a new StringInterpreter interface that allows applications

Re: Integrating migration tool into Tomcat 10

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 14:34 Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:12 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been looking at the options to integrate the Java EE to Jakarta EE > > migration functionality into Tomcat 10. > > > > There are essentially two ways to do this: dep

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deprecate JAAS Realm in 10.0.x and remove in 10.1.x

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:17 Mark Thomas wrote: > In reviewing references to Java EE (and J2EE) remaining in the Tomcat 10 > repo I found the following: > > > JAASRealm is prototype for Tomcat of the JAAS-based J2EE authentication > framework for J2EE v1.4, based on the href="https://www.jcp.o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 9.0.62

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 7:56 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.62 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to 9.0.60 are: > > - Update the packaged version of the Tomcat Native Library to 1.2.32 to >pick up Windows binaries built with OpenS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.78

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:55 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.78 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to 8.5.77 are: > > - Update the packaged version of the Tomcat Native Library to 1.2.32 to > pick up Windows binaries built with OpenSSL

Native Compilation, Continuation 2022

Hi folks, I'm jumping in on the bandwagon again. Specifically to talk some more about native compilation. The graal compiler is making headway, and it's becoming better and better at native compilation [1]. I'll put some historical context at the bottom of this post for clarity. I have a few sugg

Re: Native Compilation, Continuation 2022

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 9:45 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Filip, > > On 4/11/22 18:32, Filip Hanik wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'm jumping in on the bandwagon again. Specifically to talk some more > about > > n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M15

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:24 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M15 release is now available for > voting. > > Applications that run on Tomcat 9 and earlier will not run on Tomcat 10 > without changes. Java EE applications designed for Tomcat 9 and earlier > may be placed i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 10.0.21

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:39 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.0.21 release is now available for > voting. > > Apache Tomcat 10.0.x implements Jakarta EE 9 and, as such, the primary > package for all the specification APIs has changed from javax.* to > jakarta.* > > Applicatio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.79

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 9:14 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.79 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to 8.5.78 are: > > - Provide a property source that sources values from Kubernetes service > bind

Re: Plans for Tomcat Native

Sounds like a healthy plan. +1 On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 03:52 Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > A question on the users list about Tomcat Native, OpenSSL 3.0 FIPs > caused me to take a look at the current state of supported versions. > > The detail is here: > https://github.com/apache/tomcat-nativ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.82

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 3:15 PM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.82 release is now available for voting. > > The notable changes compared to 8.5.81 are: > > - Update the packaged version of the Tomcat Native Library to 1.2.35 to > pic

API Change - Connector.java Constructor

Team, As I'm slowly transitioning between projects, Apache Tomcat has once again showed up in my workspace. I'm currently working on improving the embedded experience for native images. I have a pull request, [1] , that I'd like to open up a discussion a

Re: API Change - Connector.java Constructor

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:20 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 06/04/2020 17:56, Filip Hanik wrote: > > Team, > > > > As I'm slowly transitioning between projects, Apache Tomcat has once > > again showed up in my workspace. I'm currently working on improving t

Re: API Change - Connector.java Constructor

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:15 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:16 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> > Noted, I think a compromise may be in order. Where we simply add a >> > constructor that avoids the Class.forName >> > and that allows the developer to explicitly invoke a constructor

Re: API Change - Connector.java Constructor

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:35 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote: > >> Does the connector need to know about the actual implementations? >> > > Ideally no, but it removes the reflection you say is bad for Graal. > Correct. Turns out that the connectors use setProperty/getProperty via reflection (Introspectio

Re: API Change - Connector.java Constructor

Thanks Remy, On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:48 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote: > >> > If we want to improve on the Connector situation regarding duplication and > reflection abuse, the only solution is to expose the different objects > involved. > > Since an example is usually better, I'll give one using ser

Graal Files for Embedded jar files (9.0.x)

I have this one for review. I would categorize it as a safe, since it doesn't affect backwards compatibility. This PR [1] has the following components 1. Changes to build script to include reflection and resources files in META-INF 2. The Graal configur

Re: API Change - Connector.java Constructor

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:28 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > >> This configuration gives the impression that the Endpoint is a child of >> the Connector. >> But the Connector truly only needs the ProtocolHandler interface to >> function. The injected object would then be better to an instance of a >

Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated (a7c132d -> 6ed7648)

Thanks Remy, I’ll run the validator and adjust accordingly On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:19 Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 1:50 AM wrote: > >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. >> >> fhanik pushed a change to branch 9.0.x >> in repository https

Re: Remove org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.bio

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:18 Mark Thomas wrote: > On 28/04/2020 17:30, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm still looking at things to remove or refactor in 10 following the > > rearchitecting failure for the Connector. One candidate could be the > > Tribes transport, since NIO is the defau

Re: Remove org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.bio

On 4/29/20 8:56 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:18 PM Mark Thomas > wrote: On 28/04/2020 17:30, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still looking at things to remove or refactor in 10 following the > rearchitecting failure for

RE: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error

From: Raymond Auge Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:58 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error This is not a good fix. This is the same problem we had before with incompatible version syntax in OSGi - Ray Hi Ray, I can’t even build

RE: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Make `ant -f mvn-pub.xml generic-install` work with the new ant tasks

is push: > new 919183b Make `ant -f mvn-pub.xml generic-install` work with > the new ant tasks 919183b is described below > > commit 919183b438e1a2f0004082c69e34accc0c3e2f16 > Author: Filip Hanik > AuthorDate: Tue Jun 23 11:11:24 2020 -0700 > > Make `ant -f mvn-pub.

RE: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error

From: Raymond Auge Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:17 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error k, so travis config is borked.. I should add github actions. I don’t think Travis tests artifact generation - Ray On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at

Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error

t.java:292) Filip - Ray On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:21 PM Filip Hanik <mailto:fha...@vmware.com>> wrote: *From:* Raymond Auge mailto:raymond.a...@liferay.com>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:17 PM *To:* Tomcat Developers List mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org>> *Su

Re: [tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fixes OSGI bundling error

{1,9}(\.\d{1,9}(\.[-\w]+)?)?)?(\]|\)))|\d{1,9}(\.\d{1,9}(\.\d{1,9}(\.[-\w]+)?)?)?` Thank you Ray, that was it! Filip - Ray On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:05 PM Raymond Auge <mailto:raymond.a...@liferay.com>> wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:45 PM Filip Hanik

Native Image - Reflectionless Concept

for discussion, all feedback and questions welcome: I've created a concept of having Apache Tomcat, embedded, run without reflection in a native image. This concept creates a jar, tomcat-embedded-programmatic.jar, that can be fine tuned to only include what is needed in a default configuration

Re: Native Image - Reflectionless Concept

Thanks for reviewing and engaging. On 7/16/20 5:31 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:59 PM Filip Hanik <mailto:fha...@vmware.com>> wrote: for discussion, all feedback and questions welcome: I've created a concept of having Apache Tomcat, embedded, r

Re: Native Image - Reflectionless Concept

16 juil. 2020 à 14:31, Rémy Maucherat <mailto:r...@apache.org>> a écrit : On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:59 PM Filip Hanik mailto:fha...@vmware.com>> wrote: for discussion, all feedback and questions welcome: I've created a concept of having Apache Tomcat, emb

Re: Native Image - Reflectionless Concept

On 7/20/20 8:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Le lun. 20 juil. 2020 à 17:41, Filip Hanik <mailto:fi...@hanik.com>> a écrit : Thanks for chiming in: On 7/16/20 6:46 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi everyone, I think the generation is the sanest option since code s

Re: svn commit: r1613897 - /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/FairBlockingQueue.java

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:02 AM, wrote: > Author: kkolinko > Date: Mon Jul 28 07:02:31 2014 > New Revision: 1613897 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1613897 > Log: > Revert generics changes from r1613123 > The code is compiled with Java 7, so why change them? > copy/paste mistake from the tc7.0.x

Re: svn commit: r1616584 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool: doc/ src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/naming/ src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/

all looks good On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2014-08-08 0:15 GMT+04:00 : > > Author: fhanik > > Date: Thu Aug 7 20:15:19 2014 > > New Revision: 1616584 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1616584 > > Log: > > Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: svn commit: r1616789 - /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/doc/changelog.xml

changelog was probably built when it was published by itself in the V1 days. we can move it to the main changelog, under jdbc-pool On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2014-08-08 18:53 GMT+04:00 : > > Author: fhanik > > Date: Fri Aug 8 14:53:06 2014 > > New Revision:

Re: svn commit: r1616644 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool: doc/jdbc-pool.xml src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/interceptor/StatementFinalizer.java

you are right, I will resolve it on Monday thanks for the review Filip On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2014-08-08 4:04 GMT+04:00 : > > Author: fhanik > > Date: Fri Aug 8 00:04:51 2014 > > New Revision: 1616644 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1616644 > > Log:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.11

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.11 Looks good over here. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 15/08/2014 21:07, Mark Thomas wrote: > > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.11 release is now available for voting. > > > > The main changes since 8.0.9 are: > > - Various

Re: Coverity static analysis scanning

hook me up On Tuesday, August 26, 2014, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > I have been pinged off-list by Coverity to say that they have set up > Tomcat with a free account with their static code analysis service. > > I think I have the ability to send invitations so if anyone wants to > take a look

Re: RFC6265, cookie parsing and UTF-8

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > One of the aims of the proposed cookie changes [1] was to deal with the > HTML 5 changes that mean UTF-8 can appear in cookie headers. > > This has some potentially large implications for Tomcat. > ​Since we already are in the 8.0.x release

Re: git (yet again)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2014-09-02 18:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > > > I'm leaning towards A myself. > ​ The move to git clears a huge hurdle, and that is managing contributions. The patch system is very difficult, and impossible to maintain. A pull request stays

Re: Tomcat 9 work started

I honestly don't see the value of keeping BIO around. At this point in time, there can be little else other than an emotional attachment to it. As mentioned in this thread, the APIs and need for more functionality in the connectors have rendered the BIO connector obsolete. If we believe that a Tomc

Re: NIO buffering

>I am not convinced by the NIO buffering that is used on output. what are you exactly referring to? Maybe I can shed some light on it. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I am not convinced by the NIO buffering that is used on output. Due to > concurrent access iss

Re: NIO buffering

pping. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2014-04-23 16:50 GMT+02:00 Filip Hanik : > > > >I am not convinced by the NIO buffering that is used on output. > > > > what are you exactly referring to? Maybe I can shed some light on it. > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.9

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.9 (stable) On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: > > >> The proposed 8.0.9 release is: >> [ ] Broken - do not release >> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.9 (alpha) >> [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.9 (beta) >> [X]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.55

[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.55 Stable On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.55 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.55/ > The Maven stagin

Re: SVN

here is a script posted on the list earlier #!/bin/sh # # This is a quickie helper script to easily build tomcat 5 from source. # This will create a subdirectory called tc5build and build # tomcat 5 into it. # # He

Re: Tomcat fails to service requests after period of time

try your same test case with mod_proxy, after that switch to the tomcat user list Steve Gaunt wrote: HI, Has anyone else had any issue using mod_jk under heavy load.. It seems after a period of time(or large no. opf requests) under heavy load AJP connetor just hangs. It's crazy. All the

Re: Fwd: FarmWarDeployer

It is ready, but it is also very basic. like it only deploys .war files, and as with any prod app, I would recommend not using hot deploy in production anyway Filip Brian O'Rourke wrote: Trying the dev list... -- Forwarded message -- From: Brian O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat v5.5.14 Stability

out of curiosity, I haven't yet been too much on the 5.5 platform, is this a new bug introduced, cause we have never seen it on 5.0 Filip Peter Rossbach wrote: Hey! I have changed the cluster message header format long time ago 5.5.10. In some situations TCP Stack split the message, then the

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat v5.5.14 Stability

comes in. Now it is fixed. Every help is welcome. Peter Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: out of curiosity, I haven't yet been too much on the 5.5 platform, is this a new bug introduced, cause we have never seen it on 5.0 Filip Peter Rossbach wrote: Hey! I have changed the cluster m

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat v5.5.14 Stability

. I hope to have more time next year. Filip Peter Rossbach wrote: Compression is optional for cluster messages. Very big message can be set a flag that need compression. This flag is the header extension. Peter Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: interesting, why did the protocol header need

Re: Proxied client IP logging

if you have two proxy servers, very common, the X-Forwarded-For becomes a comma separated list of IP addresses Shankar Unni wrote: Tim Funk wrote: 2) X-Forwarded-For (IIRC) can be multi-valued (comma seperated via multiple proxies) Plus, other load balancers seem to stick in other headers

Re: Cutting Tomcat 5.5.15 tomorrow (Tuesday)

why would you replicate session data across contexts? cross context means different webapps, maybe I'm confused, but an app would never fail over from one webapp to a different webapp. Filip Peter Rossbach wrote: Hey, all my clustering fixes are committed. Fine, than I can start to finis

Re: Cutting Tomcat 5.5.15 tomorrow (Tuesday)

makes, sense, should be a simple check in the ReplicationValve.java code base, thanks for enlightening me Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: why would you replicate session data across contexts? cross context means different webapps, maybe I'm confused, but a

Re: Source for org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteConnector

ok. too many tomcat-user questions answered on dev, lets move all those discussions where they belong >Re: Source for org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteConnector >Re: truncated server.xml got when storing config on condition that more than one vitual host with same application base directory "web

Re: IllegalState during invalidate a (Delta)Session.

I can't implement the change you suggest as it could result in a circular loop, expire - fire event - last access -> isValid() -> expire -> fire event -> last access I have added in the missing message for this event, if you are not happy with that solution, please provide a simple test case f

Re: Cluster - Extra Bytes at Message transfer?

Thanks Peter for the explanation, that will save me some time. I have noticed that several default values changed between 5.0 and 5.5. I think its better in the future to leave the default values as is, but give the user an option to change it. Don't change it for them, wouldn't be a default val

Cluster - questions

What are the SocketReplicationListener and the SocketReplicationThread classes? seems like we are duplicating functionality. I'm planning on breaking out the membership and replication logic into a component so that we don't mix group messaging logic with session replication logic as they are

Re: svn commit: r377486 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/mcast/McastService.java

>Are your current big changes not a very high risk to break the cluster functionaliy again? You must have faith in force Luke, otherwise you will have anger, anger leads to hate and hate leads to the darkside on a serious note, no, I don't plan on creating a duplicate clustering module. Fi

Re: Cluster - questions

very important for some user. I think also we must discuss the next steps to change the cluster code. Regards Peter Am 09.02.2006 um 00:40 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists: What are the SocketReplicationListener and the SocketReplicationThread classes? seems like we are duplicating functionality

Re: Cluster - questions

async mode we not need a lots of parallell threads. Peter Am 15.02.2006 um 15:51 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists: Question, what Linux distributions that run Java 1.4 or higher (required for 5.5) do not support NIO? Filip Peter Rossbach wrote: It implements aTCP/IP Socket receiver

Re: never say never...

+1 =) Reinhard Moosauer wrote: Hi List, please somebody explain: every few days, a strange procedure can be seen on this list. Somebody asks for improvement, suggests a fix or simply wants to discuss a new feature. Few minutes later, there is an answer from somebody, which tells us to ignor

Re: never say never...

I really try to avoid these threads cause I'm not interested in debates nor the political aspects of open source projects and how they work, but the user brings up a good point, with a probable solution, and I don't see how a non committer response like the one below is even justified. I'm not in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >