On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I understand people using JDBC authenticator would miss the connection
pooling - but maybe they could download it separately ? Would't be
easier to just download the 'official' version ?
No.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces (a bit late) the immediate availability
of Apache
Tomcat 5.5.28 stable.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.28 incorporates numerous security updates and bug fixes.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
With this change to createRandom it is not clear to me what the value of the
reseeding is when the SecureRandom is not user-supplied. Maybe a crypto
expert can comment. It would speed up initialization in the default case if
the reseeding was only done for user-defined generators.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 27/11/2010 21:01, Phil Steitz wrote:
With this change to createRandom it is not clear to me what the value of
the
reseeding is when the SecureRandom is not user-supplied.
Maybe not a huge amount.
It would speed up
On 12/16/11 12:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
2. Nexus
Personally, my only requirements are:
a) that the JARs reach Maven Central
b) publishing is as simple as running a single script
I
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:44 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 December 2011 05:19, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/16/11 12:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
2. Nexus
On 12/17/11 11:42 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 17/12/2011 18:35, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 17/12/2011 18:14, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Ok then interprete my words as: now you can use a staging repository.
This
> On Mar 18, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I started to work on cleaning up the DBCP generics warnings in 7.0.x before I
> remembered what "fun" it was when I did this for DBCP2. While some of it is
> straight-forward, some of it requires some refactoring. From memory,
On 10/16/19 7:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/10/2019 00:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
How about adding the DBCP unit tests to the source tree? I suspect some
would have failed due to this change. If others think this is a good
idea, I could take a stab at genericising them and creating a PR
On 10/16/19 7:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/10/2019 00:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
How about adding the DBCP unit tests to the source tree? I suspect some
would have failed due to this change. If others think this is a good
idea, I could take a stab at genericising them and creating a PR
Sorry I missed all of these things. Is there a checkstyle or eclipse
config somewhere that I can use to make sure the next batch is clean?
Phil
On 10/25/19 11:12 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833
Phil Steitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from Phil Steitz ---
This is a regression
12 matches
Mail list logo