On 07/04/2009, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.19/
Hashes and sigs look OK, though I only checked the main archives.
There's a packaging problem with the source archives.
I would expect the .zip
On 09/04/2009, jfcl...@apache.org jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Apr 9 16:32:04 2009
New Revision: 763726
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763726view=rev
Log:
Add the Tcp code... Still need the code in httpd-trunk to test it.
Added:
On 10/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm generally against this find bugs 'may be bugs' issues.
is there an actual bug here?
Reported bug, no. Bugs uses could hit, yes. Hence why this is in trunk
and not being proposed for backport.
Are
On 09/04/2009, jfcl...@apache.org jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Apr 9 13:00:21 2009
New Revision: 763635
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763635view=rev
Log:
Move the multi logic to MultiCastSender with
the idea to TCP sockets and a list of proxy too.
On 12/04/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 10/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm generally against this find bugs 'may be bugs' issues.
is there an actual bug here
On 14/04/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 14 22:16:53 2009
New Revision: 764985
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=764985view=rev
Log:
Fix secondary issue reported as part of bug47013
Which says:
req.setQueryString(Constants.PRECOMPILE +
On 17/04/2009, Kirk True k...@mustardgrain.com wrote:
Hi all,
I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi.
The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it
chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries.
AFAIK it
On 20/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Looks like we need to run native2ascii over a quite a few French and
German files.
Surely the ISO-8859-1 (Latin-1) character set supports most accents in
Latin languages, so there should be no need to use Unicode escapes
On 20/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 20/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Looks like we need to run native2ascii over a quite a few French and
German files.
Surely the ISO-8859-1 (Latin-1) character set supports most
compile.source=1.5 yet there are several references to features
which require Java 1.6+
On 01/05/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
I was thinking to create a release, (I know I dropped the ball on the last
one), to gather feedback on the code itself.
There have been
There are two Tomcat lists in svn-authorization:
tomcat-pmc
tomcat-watchdog
The tomcat-pmc list appears to be the standard list for giving
access to the normal Tomcat SVN development directories, and does not
seem to have anything to do with the Tomcat PMC.
I think all the other lists with -pmc
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.
All jars should ideally have NL files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.
The EXE fails to install the following file:
RELEASE-NOTES
It also fails to install RUNNING.txt
Here are a few more missing properties:
svn ps svn:eol-style native java/javax/el/LocalStrings_es.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native java/javax/servlet/LocalStrings_es.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native
java/org/apache/catalina/ha/LocalStrings_es.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native
There are quite a lot of public mutable static fields in the current
Tomcat6 codebase.
Such fields can allow malicious or accidental changes to occur, so
should be avoided as far as possible.
[And if a class has public mutable static fields it's generally
impossible to make it thread-safe.]
The
/tomcat/lite/LiteTestHelper.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
modules/tomcat-lite/test/org/apache/tomcat/test/watchdog/WatchdogHttpClient.java
On 21/05/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 21.05.2009 23:29, sebb wrote:
Here are a few more missing properties:
svn ps svn:eol
On 22/05/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.05.2009 01:07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Guys fix your svn configuration. ;)
This happens to me all the time, as I move between machines very often.
Why is the ~/.subversion/config a
On 22/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, all!
Are there any Coding Guidelines that we ought to follow,
or is our project on our own there?
I am interested in clarifying the following question:
What is the character encoding for our sources.
Our build scripts
On 21/05/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
There are quite a lot of public mutable static fields in the current
Tomcat6 codebase.
Such fields can allow malicious or accidental changes to occur, so
should be avoided as far as possible.
[And if a class
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ]
On 25/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/24 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm
On 02/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Martin Dubuc wrote:
What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially
released?
that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be
released.
I've not seen the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail ?
Apart from the problems with NL files etc that have already been
mentioned, I found the following:
==
The changelog.html file refers to Tomcat JDBC Connection Pool
*v1.0.5-beta* which looks wrong.
==
The documentation for the Interceptors appears to be incorrect.
For example:
The code
On 12/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:38:29 2009
New Revision: 784083
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784083view=rev
Log:
Implement alias resources. Key features:
- configured at the context level in the same way as the other
On 15/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Sebb, thanks for the feedback.
sebb wrote:
Apart from the problems with NL files etc that have already been
mentioned, I found the following:
==
The changelog.html file refers to Tomcat JDBC Connection Pool
*v1.0.5
The copyright year in the NOTICE files in the binary archive is still
2008; surely it should be 2009?
The connectors/NOTICE file in the source archive is wrong.
There are no NOTICE files for the jasper and servletapi directory sub-trees.
It would be better to have a single NL file at the top of
On 16/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jun 16 11:17:26 2009
New Revision: 785164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785164view=rev
Log:
Update exclusion list for EOL filtering
Modified:
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jun 16 11:17:26 2009
New Revision: 785164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785164view=rev
Log:
Update exclusion list
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
There were enough issues to re-roll the release. For the record, I tried
and failed on several machines to recreate the problem sebb saw so I can
only assume it was a local JVM issue.
I've just realised that it might be due to trying to install without
Admin privileges
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
The candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
According
On 16/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Sebb, I can't find anything that is broken. All your concerns seem invalid
to me.
Please revisit, especially the NOTICE files.
Filip
sebb wrote:
On 15/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote
On 17/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Sebb, I can't find anything that is broken. All your concerns seem
invalid
to me.
Please revisit, especially the NOTICE files
On 18/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
I think this needs to be volatile ?
In (GetDateBenchmarkTest)
+private long currentMillis = 0;
Same for (in TimeDateElementBenchmarkTest)
+private Date currentDate = null;
Of course - since
On 18/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
I think this needs to be volatile ?
In (GetDateBenchmarkTest)
+private long currentMillis = 0;
Same for (in TimeDateElementBenchmarkTest
On 19/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
So now that we've clarified that NOTICE and LICENSE covers the entire
release as an entity,
No idea what you mean by that, but anyway:
As I have written several times before, the NOTICE file is incorrect.
This applies to the
Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
662:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
Not sure this double-checked looking offers any benefit ;-)
On 19/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
662:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
Not sure this double-checked looking offers any benefit ;-)
Line
create a new Date
unecessarily.
2009/6/19 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 19/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
662
On 19/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Jun 19 15:05:04 2009
New Revision: 786532
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786532view=rev
Log:
Correct per sebb/markt
Sorry, but this is still incorrect.
The NOTICE is now:
This product includes
On 19/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Jun 19 16:16:16 2009
New Revision: 786569
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786569view=rev
Log:
correction
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/NOTICE
Modified:
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are
available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is:
Did you mean 4.1.40?
Also,
On 19/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are
available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
According to the release
On 19/06/2009, kkoli...@apache.org kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Fri Jun 19 18:57:59 2009
New Revision: 786631
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786631view=rev
Log:
Add two more implementations for the second test.
a) using a single ThreadLocal instead of
On 19/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 19 20:21:53 2009
New Revision: 786653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786653view=rev
Log:
Switch to ThreadLocal where possible. This removes all the syncs apart from
those related to accessing
On 22/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jun 22 11:58:07 2009
New Revision: 787211
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=787211view=rev
Log:
Fix a couple of Eclipse warnings
Modified:
On 22/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
in the spirit of trying to get my poop right,
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Looks a lot better.
the binary releases contain everything in individual jar files (including
source references for IDEs)
On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Cleaned up and fixed.
The release is located here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Exactly the same path names were used previously; I assume you are
referring to the following versions of the files:
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Cleaned up and fixed.
The release is located here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Exactly the same path
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Cleaned up and fixed
When testing with Derby on Java 1.6.0 I get the following error:
[junit] Running org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test.StarvationTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test.StarvationTest
[junit] AbandonedObjectPool is used
(org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.abandonedobjectp...@1d6096)
On 27/06/2009, Xie Xiaodong xxd82...@gmail.com wrote:
But how could ThreadLocal be shared among all AccessLogValve instances on
the same server? After all, each thread access ThreadLocal has its own.
Another point, based on the java doc of ThreadLocal, maybe private
On 29/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jun 29 17:38:21 2009
New Revision: 789392
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789392view=rev
Log:
Remove all usage of GPL or LGPL downloads.
+1, thanks.
Use H2 for test database (EPL1.0) as it can
On 29/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jun 29 17:38:21 2009
New Revision: 789392
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789392view=rev
Log:
Remove all usage of GPL or LGPL downloads
On 30/06/2009, rj...@apache.org rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Jun 30 13:26:10 2009
New Revision: 789714
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789714view=rev
Log:
Separate statistics counter lock in FastAsyncSocketSender
from inherited DataSender lock to reduce
On 30/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:15:28 2009
New Revision: 789883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789883view=rev
Log:
Apply patch by sebb from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47458
Store db
On 01/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 1 13:19:15 2009
New Revision: 790155
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790155view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43343
Port of r656751, r778523, r778524, r784453
On 02/07/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 2 17:35:26 2009
New Revision: 790693
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790693view=rev
Log:
break out javadoc into its own target
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/build.xml
On 02/07/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 2 17:08:50 2009
New Revision: 790684
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790684view=rev
Log:
Add some doco, make shared variables volatile
Modified:
On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
think it should be all in order now
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
Eclipse and Findbugs show the following warnings for the non-test code:
Description ResourcePathTypeLocation
Class is a
On 07/07/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
As was written early in this my thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Coding-Guidelines%2C-encodings%2C-keywords-td23662661.html
(http://markmail.org/thread/d6dsgrsfvnuzclt7)
there are problems with Subversion
On 16/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 16 19:34:49 2009
New Revision: 794798
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=794798view=rev
Log:
More GSOC work from Xie Xiadong
Initial implementation of RemoteHost and RemoteAddr filters.
Added:
On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
think it should be all in order now
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
There are some differences between the source archives and the SVN tag:
In SVN, but not in source archive:
On 22/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 22 14:29:09 2009
New Revision: 796739
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796739view=rev
Log:
Restore the @Overrides. Eclipse on my Mac wasn't configured right. Sorry for
the noise.
The
On 23/07/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Correct, servlet 3.0 requires minimum 1.6
so we don't have to build down to 1.5 anymore
Filip
I think sebb needs to do an svn up. build.properties.default has specified 1.6
for over 6 months.
I
On 23/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 23 17:15:55 2009
New Revision: 797151
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797151view=rev
Log:
Correct the file name
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml
URL:
On 24/07/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.07.2009 20:43, sebb wrote:
On 23/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 23 17:15:55 2009
New Revision: 797151
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797151view=rev
Log
On 24/07/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Jul 24 15:25:17 2009
New Revision: 797529
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797529view=rev
Log:
update test cases
Modified:
On 24/07/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Jul 24 15:24:52 2009
New Revision: 797528
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797528view=rev
Log:
Add in Linux special case for performance optimization around locking.
Set default queue to be the
On 24/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.28/
There is no .zip version of apache-tomcat-5.5.28-fulldocs.tar.gz
The source archives contain the file
container/webapps/admin/images/Thumbs.db
which does not belong in
On 25/07/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 25.07.2009 01:44, sebb wrote:
On 24/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Likewise, the file tomcat-users.xml looks wrong - it says that there
is no user with the manager role, yet it contains the following
On 27/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
The candidates source and binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.7/
According to the release process, the 1.0.7 tag is:
[X] Broken
Test failures and various other bugs already reported.
On 02/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Just noticed another problem - the source archive does not contain the
overall build script.
I don't know where you are looking, but the script is there.
Sorry, my bad - I'd expanded the archives and was looking in the wrong
On 04/08/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
On 07/27/2009 02:21 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The candidates source and binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.7/
According to the release process, the 1.0.7 tag is:
[ ]
On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The svn re-organisation is complete.
Is the file build/BUILDING.txt still accurate?
I've just tried following it and Ant reports:
Buildfile: build.xml
check.source:
get.source:
checkout:
[echo] If the checkout fails, see
On 12/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The svn re-organisation is complete.
Is the file build/BUILDING.txt still accurate?
Yes. It is the top-level build.xml that needs tweaking.
Presumably I would need
On 12/08/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 12/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The svn re-organisation is complete.
Is the file build
On 17/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 17/08/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
+ else
+if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
Might be better to check $FORCE before sleeping?
On reflection, I don't think there is any need for a sleep here at all
I've fixed the projects build to use:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/rdc/trunk/doap_rdc.rdf
Please can someone on the project can check if the DOAP itself needs updating.
Thanks.
-- Forwarded message --
From: aps...@apache.org aps...@apache.org
Date: 18 Aug 2009
On 18/08/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Aug 18 11:49:26 2009
New Revision: 805375
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=805375view=rev
Log:
Replace the RequestDumperValve with a RequestDumperFilter. Merge the
RequestDumperFilter from the
FYI:
This is probably a manifestation of the following Firefox bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237623
which also seems to affect IE.
See also INFRA-2188
On 25/08/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Downloaded using firefox
6034944 bytes
Filip
On
The same person also raised a JIRA issue.
[It was INFRA-2178, now deleted.]
On 31/08/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
This looks like spam to me.
I am going to purge it from Bugzilla and disable the account of the use
that created it.
Mark
On 01/09/2009, Larry Isaacs larry.isa...@sas.com wrote:
Hi Filip,
I have a vague recollection about tripping over this issue while working on
the Tomcat support in the Eclipse Web Tools Platform. WTP has its own
version(s) of VirtualWebappLoader, called WtpWebappLoader, to address it. If
On 07/09/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Sep 7 12:45:58 2009
New Revision: 812115
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=812115view=rev
Log:
Apply AD improvements
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
On 12/09/2009, idar...@apache.org idar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: idarwin
Date: Sat Sep 12 16:58:08 2009
New Revision: 814198
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=814198view=rev
Log:
Trivial typo correction
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/PROPOSALS.txt
Modified:
thought so to, but I tested it :)
That always helps :)
It doesn't really matter for webapps and we do just leave the files with
whatever line ending they had when the files were built. I'll look at
completely re-doign this for Tomcat 7. I think Sebb proposed a patch
somewhere
On 08/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
Mostly for the archives since I had the first observation below when I
had to build the site as well:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:24 AM, bay...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Wed Oct 7 05:24:06 2009
New Revision:
On 09/10/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Oct 9 22:02:35 2009
New Revision: 823713
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=823713view=rev
Log:
Explicitly mark all our valves so that we can track down which ones we need
to fix and make async
On 12 August 2011 15:34, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51656
(Dammit this description window is too narrow...)
Just drag the bottom rh corner (indicated by small dots) ...
-
To
On 7 August 2011 11:37, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Aug 7 10:37:16 2011
New Revision: 1154689
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1154689view=rev
Log:
Only try and create the dir if it doesn't already exist
Modified:
On 18 August 2011 14:56, Jean-Frederic Clere jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.33 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.33 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All users
of older versions of the Tomcat 6.0 family should
On 13 July 2011 14:28, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 13 13:28:24 2011
New Revision: 1146005
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1146005view=rev
Log:
When running under a security manager and using sendfile, validate sendfile
attributes to prevent sendfile being
On 7 September 2011 13:31, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 7 12:31:30 2011
New Revision: 1166150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1166150view=rev
Log:
async more likely than comet
Modified:
On 19 September 2011 17:30, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Sep 19 16:30:36 2011
New Revision: 1172689
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1172689view=rev
Log:
Fix threading issue with changing visibility of methods and fields
Modified:
The Jakarta TLP is about to retire to the attic; however the taglibs
site still refers to non-existent jakarta pages for the downloads.
A bug [1] was raised for this for this some while ago, but there
appears to be no-one interested in fixing the issue.
[1]
The Tomcat 5 and 6 releases contain quite a few jars. Some of these
may well be useful outside the Tomcat project (e.g. the api jars).
However the jars do not contain NOTICE or LICENSE files, and the
MANIFESTs are minimal.
Please could future releases be updated to fix this?
The sort of
Just out of curiosity, I ran Findbugs 1.3.5 on Tomcat 6.0.18. The
default settings generated some 1400 warnings about possible bugs.
Quite a few of them look serious - assuming that the code which
contains them is being used.
For example, there are quite a few public static fields which are not
BTW, Commons LANG has a thread-safe FastDateUtils which can be used
for formatting (but not parsing) dates.
Not sure why you did not just fix DateTool - e.g. by using ThreadLocal
(or indeed synchronizing the use of DateFormats) - rather than fixing
all calls to DateTool.
Or maybe I've
On 29/09/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
BTW, Commons LANG has a thread-safe FastDateUtils which can be used
for formatting (but not parsing) dates.
A whole jar for one method is somewhat overkill.
Indeed, but there's lots of other useful stuff in LANG.
I just
On 29/09/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 29/09/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ThreadLocals and container classloader environments need careful handling
to avoid memory leaks.
I would have thought that was a good reason to keep the class - one
On 07/10/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Oct 7 12:10:51 2008
New Revision: 702587
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=702587view=rev
Log:
EG confirmed that attribute values should be fully escaped, including any
EL. Note this does not fix
On 09/10/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mark, you are right.
The mime extension is not working on a case insensitive basis. Now my
Tomcat 5.5 does byte serving with the web.xml portion below:
mime-mapping
extensionpdf/extension
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
