[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 Sattarmenu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #9 from Sattarmenu

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Jung --- Additional info. The RFC draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status/?include_text=1 says: Responses using this status code SHOULD

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |-

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #4) This (and any other new codes) can be added once they are approved. +1 Any webapp that wants to use code 451 (amusing

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #3 from Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de --- Wait. Why add a status code that hasn't been approved yet? The spec might go nowhere. Or it might be approved, but with a different status code. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com --- Link to versions of the proposal to add this new status code to HTTP in IETF document tracking tool:

[Bug 53602] Support for HTTP status code 451

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de --- OK to add for me. The IANA link I added to the comments wasn't meant to police other status code additions but instead to be useful for future checks. So Tim, you might want to