[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-08-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

Mark Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas  ---
This report, as originally described, is not reproducible on Tomcat 8.0.x and
earlier. While sockets in CLOSE_WAIT are observed, they do not remain in that
state for more than a few seconds. Further, analysis of this issue with
8.5.x/trunk showed that it was introduced by r1746551 and that r1757903 was the
correct fix for that issue.

You can not be observing the same problem on 7.0.x, even if the symptoms are
identical, as r1746551 was not back-ported to 8.0.x or earlier.

Since the root causes are different there is no basis to conclude that the
required fix is the same.

Please open a new issue and provide the steps to reproduce on a clean install
of the latest stable release of any of the supported branches (currently 7.0.x,
8.0.x, 8.5.x and 9.0.x).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-08-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

--- Comment #6 from Vaibhav Bhandari  ---
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java?r1=1757813&r2=1757903&diff_format=h

This is the change that needs to be ported to 7.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

Vaibhav Bhandari  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|FIXED   |---
 Status|CLOSED  |REOPENED

--- Comment #5 from Vaibhav Bhandari  ---
Reopening as porting to 7.0 version is needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-08-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

Vaibhav Bhandari  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vbhand...@vmware.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-08-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

--- Comment #4 from Vaibhav Bhandari  ---
@hiki's comments seems right and thats why a port to 7.0 line would be needed.
We have hit this issue in 7.0 tomcat version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

--- Comment #3 from hiki  ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60035 ***

Thanks ,the problem is solved,
but I don't think the relationship with r1746551 is direct
I think the main solution to this problem is the following code

org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint

if (socket.isHandshakeComplete()) {
// No TLS handshaking required. Let the handler
// process this socket / event combination.
handshake = 0;
} else if (event == SocketEvent.STOP || event ==
SocketEvent.DISCONNECT ||
event == SocketEvent.ERROR) {
// Unable to complete the TLS handshake. Treat it
as
// if the handshake failed.
handshake = -1;
} else {
handshake = socket.handshake(key.isReadable(),
key.isWritable());
// The handshake process reads/writes from/to the
// socket. status may therefore be OPEN_WRITE once
// the handshake completes. However, the handshake
// happens when the socket is opened so the status
// must always be OPEN_READ after it completes. It
// is OK to always set this as it is only used if
// the handshake completes.
event = SocketEvent.OPEN_READ;
}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

hiki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |FIXED
 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #2 from hiki  ---
Thanks. Has been upgraded to 8.5.6 and the problem is solved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 60555] run by ssl and port:443 close_wait

2017-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555

Mark Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60035 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org