https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas ---
A further issue was identified and fixed. Awaiting user feedback.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ---
As per the update to the spring issue
(https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/26407) 9.0.x now
contains a fix that may help with this. Currently waiting for user feedback.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #12 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
The reproducer provided in the Spring issue uses Tomcat 9.0.41 and that has the
available() fixes.
Bug 65001 might be a factor and that is a post 9.0.41 fix but since I can't
reproduce the issue, I can't
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #9)
> RE-opening this issue while I look at the test case...
The use of non container threads doing ??? seems to be the root cause of the
problems here. Also the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat ---
That doesn't look good, it seems the state of the destination buffer is
changing concurrently (suddenly, no remaining bytes although the capacity is
still there), which then breaks the algorithm. Maybe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #7 from pil...@yahoo.com ---
I believe I have hit this same issue.
I reported a bug against Spring as
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/26407
I have created a standalone application that can be used to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Two months have passed and we still don't have a minimal WAR that reproduces
this issue. I'll leave this open another month but without a test case to
investigate this will get closed.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #3 from Jerry Hou ---
"boundedElastic-90" #434 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x21055000
nid=0xd14 runnable [0x4383d000]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
at
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
--- Comment #2 from mgrigorov ---
Could you please provide the full stack traces for these two threads ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
Jerry Hou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Windows CPU processor |Windows CPU processor
15 matches
Mail list logo