Re: Missing git commit emails
Am 30.04.2019 um 12:07 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 30/04/2019 09:17, Rainer Jung wrote: What could we do to avoid those summary emails, more precisely to reliably get the detail emails? Currently a review via email often is not possible due to the missing detail emails. I think it is related to pushing multiple commits at once. Best bet is to engage with the infra team. Done that. Infra knew about it [1] and was already investigating with GitHub on how to fix it. One fix to an ASF script was applied yesterday [2] and Sebb also recommends to only use Gitbox not Github to pull/push [3]. So if the applied fix actualy fixes the problem, we are good, if not, we could try switching individually to GitBox. I myself was only using GitBox, because without reason I was assuming it to be more authoritative. Regards, Rainer [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17931 [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=infrastructure-puppet.git;a=commitdiff;h=a5884ae;hp=2802a7b01d15345531dcfea4c2716573357fcf89 [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4aeb1af5e142d3abc10b5c0fb98a2b1ac0e4386fd52a1543ef6b82ad@%3Cdev.ponymail.apache.org%3E - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Missing git commit emails
On 30/04/2019 09:17, Rainer Jung wrote: > What could we do to avoid those summary emails, more precisely to > reliably get the detail emails? Currently a review via email often is > not possible due to the missing detail emails. I think it is related to pushing multiple commits at once. Best bet is to engage with the infra team. Mark > > I wonder whether the occurence of these "no details, instead just a > summary" emails has anything to do with the exact work flow of pulling > branching and pushing on the local repos side. Or whether it has > anything to do with us using two different git repos (at Github and > gitbox at Apache). > > Sometimes it happens direct after a change of committer, sometimes the > commits in such a block go back in time. But the one case in master > cited below has no such obvious peculiarity. All of the commits and also > the ones directly before and after that block come from Mark, so no > change, the time increases monotonically: > > commit e0c112c514b07e5c323ca3a184fe26029e3cde4e > Author: Mark Thomas > Date: Fri Apr 26 21:56:07 2019 +0100 > > Import update Czech translations from POEDitor > > BEGIN BUNDLED COMMITS > > commit a01cff1cc3fe5c86559c071e7941699b45ef94d5 > Author: Mark Thomas > Date: Fri Apr 26 21:52:04 2019 +0100 > > Import updated French translations > > commit 16ea77018aaa7bd7b0ecd69cf6bf3771be59c2c6 > Author: Mark Thomas > Date: Fri Apr 26 21:51:32 2019 +0100 > > Import updated Japanese translations from POEditor > > END BUNDLED COMMITS > > commit c3e33a090791bf3abdeead4075d403f6ab337e97 > Author: Mark Thomas > Date: Fri Apr 26 20:56:27 2019 +0100 > > Remove unused translations > > commit 88e03792f840bdbc2bbf07d38074823e17bff412 > Author: Mark Thomas > Date: Fri Apr 26 20:55:18 2019 +0100 > > Import updated French translations from POEditor > > > > I am sorry not to have any precise ideas currently, but I am willing to > help eg. by exercising a couple of different work flows, using different > repositories etc. But at the moment I don't have any good ideas about > where to start. > > Thanks and regards, > > Rainer > > Am 26.04.2019 um 23:00 schrieb ma...@apache.org:> This is an automated > email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. >> >> markt pushed a change to branch master >> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git. >> >> >> from c3e33a0 Remove unused translations >> new 16ea770 Import updated Japanese translations from POEditor >> new a01cff1 Import updated French translations >> >> The 20788 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this >> repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions >> listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only >> been added to this reference. >> >> >> Summary of changes: >> java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings_ja.properties | 2 +- >> java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/LocalStrings_fr.properties | 2 ++ >> java/org/apache/catalina/util/LocalStrings_ja.properties | 2 -- >> java/org/apache/coyote/http2/LocalStrings_fr.properties | 2 ++ >> java/org/apache/tomcat/util/modeler/LocalStrings_fr.properties | 1 + >> java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/LocalStrings_fr.properties | 2 ++ >> webapps/docs/changelog.xml | 4 >> 7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Missing git commit emails
What could we do to avoid those summary emails, more precisely to reliably get the detail emails? Currently a review via email often is not possible due to the missing detail emails. I wonder whether the occurence of these "no details, instead just a summary" emails has anything to do with the exact work flow of pulling branching and pushing on the local repos side. Or whether it has anything to do with us using two different git repos (at Github and gitbox at Apache). Sometimes it happens direct after a change of committer, sometimes the commits in such a block go back in time. But the one case in master cited below has no such obvious peculiarity. All of the commits and also the ones directly before and after that block come from Mark, so no change, the time increases monotonically: commit e0c112c514b07e5c323ca3a184fe26029e3cde4e Author: Mark Thomas Date: Fri Apr 26 21:56:07 2019 +0100 Import update Czech translations from POEDitor BEGIN BUNDLED COMMITS commit a01cff1cc3fe5c86559c071e7941699b45ef94d5 Author: Mark Thomas Date: Fri Apr 26 21:52:04 2019 +0100 Import updated French translations commit 16ea77018aaa7bd7b0ecd69cf6bf3771be59c2c6 Author: Mark Thomas Date: Fri Apr 26 21:51:32 2019 +0100 Import updated Japanese translations from POEditor END BUNDLED COMMITS commit c3e33a090791bf3abdeead4075d403f6ab337e97 Author: Mark Thomas Date: Fri Apr 26 20:56:27 2019 +0100 Remove unused translations commit 88e03792f840bdbc2bbf07d38074823e17bff412 Author: Mark Thomas Date: Fri Apr 26 20:55:18 2019 +0100 Import updated French translations from POEditor I am sorry not to have any precise ideas currently, but I am willing to help eg. by exercising a couple of different work flows, using different repositories etc. But at the moment I don't have any good ideas about where to start. Thanks and regards, Rainer Am 26.04.2019 um 23:00 schrieb ma...@apache.org:> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > markt pushed a change to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git. > > > from c3e33a0 Remove unused translations > new 16ea770 Import updated Japanese translations from POEditor > new a01cff1 Import updated French translations > > The 20788 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this > repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions > listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only > been added to this reference. > > > Summary of changes: > java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings_ja.properties | 2 +- > java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/LocalStrings_fr.properties | 2 ++ > java/org/apache/catalina/util/LocalStrings_ja.properties | 2 -- > java/org/apache/coyote/http2/LocalStrings_fr.properties| 2 ++ > java/org/apache/tomcat/util/modeler/LocalStrings_fr.properties | 1 + > java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/LocalStrings_fr.properties | 2 ++ > webapps/docs/changelog.xml | 4 > 7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
