Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-07-21 Thread Violeta Georgieva
На пт, 26.06.2020 г. в 23:41 Rémy Maucherat написа: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems to be >> the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" and "use >> whatever GitHub use". There

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-26 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems to be > the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" and "use > whatever GitHub use". There was also interest in "trunk". Particularly > with the

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 6/26/20 10:48, Mark Thomas wrote: > Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems > to be the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" > and "use whatever GitHub use". There was also interest in "trunk". >

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-26 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi, Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems to be the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" and "use whatever GitHub use". There was also interest in "trunk". Particularly with the additional suggestion of "10.0.x" appearing in the middle of the

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-19 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 16/06/2020 à 10:02, Mark Thomas a écrit : > Thoughts? I'd prefer the status-quo and keep "master", I've always understood this as the 'master record' (I know it might be historically wrong) and I haven't seen evidences it has ever offended or deterred anyone from contributing. If there is a

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 6/16/20 04:02, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside > the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git > branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-17 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
вт, 16 июн. 2020 г. в 11:02, Mark Thomas : > > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to > master/slave and its

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, Do you know if there would be a redirect of existing PR and "existing" references to master or does it break the ecosystem for a while - if so I'm not sure it is worth it ? If it does not break anything "latest" does not sound that bad and likely avoids this superior/inferior thought people

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to >

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Raymond Auge
+1 for main On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Coty Sutherland wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> All, >> >> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF >> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you >>

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Coty Sutherland
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to > master/slave and

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2020-06-16 um 12:09 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote: Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you haven't,

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: >> All, >> >> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF >> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you >> haven't, the short version is that the name

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to master/slave and its associations

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Violeta Georgieva
На вт, 16.06.2020 г. в 11:02 Mark Thomas написа: > > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to > master/slave and