FYI, definitely the wrong license header on that file :)
-David
On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
maybe last event should be AfterServiceCall(service, appInfo) for all
services or renamed to AfterRESTService
Side note: please don't add a
Some many releases ago, this started popping up in our logs. Eternal gratitude
to anyone who might have time to investigate and eliminate :)
INFO - Removing non-required WorkContextHandler with no context:
org.apache.geronimo.connector.work.TransactionContextHandler@8822a0
INFO - Removing
anything to reproduce it?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-03-21 18:02 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com:
Some many releases ago, this
PS: did you uncomment in conf/logging.properties the line:
org.apache.geronimo.level = SEVERE
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-03-21 18:07 GMT+01:00
That's from the build.
mingus:~/work/tomee-trunk 10:39:42
$ wget -q -O -
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/958/steps/test/logs/stdio
| grep -c WorkContextHandler
995
On Mar 21, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
anything to reproduce
can you retest now please?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-03-21 18:40 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com:
That's from the build.
For Observers maybe we can find another way to achieve OPENEJB-2082 without
binding one observer directly to another:
public void observe(final @Observes(after = SimpleObserver.class)
SimpleEvent event)
I can see that creating just as much of a mess as having too many events.
Having to
-1 to index, it is what is in deltaspike, spec etc and it doesn't work
by design (see the spec already defined constants). For such an
internal thing we know where we want to bind our event so I still
think referencing the event is better.
Always better to say where you want to be than saying i
There are some downsides to reference based approaches as well.
A.class: public void observe(final @Observes SimpleEvent event)
Z.class: public void observe(final @Observes(after=A.class) SimpleEvent
event)
If you later want to add B.class or C.class in the middle between A and Z,
yep both have advantages and drawbacks. One open question for me is
Class or String but not int cause first thing you'll do if not the
name (or class) is to look for all other adatpers...not efficient.
Class makes a forced dependency, String make it optional. ATM I think
Class is enough while we
10 matches
Mail list logo
