Re: The road to TomEE 8

2017-08-11 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Sounds reasonable to me -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:34 AM, David Blevins wrote: > I’m happy to see is get started with 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT now in a tomee8 branch. > > As for 8.1, slight

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2017-08-11 Thread Mark Struberg
A few thoughts as mentioned over at the Geronimo list: Reusable components make sense they are clearly distinctable. The part which contains that reusable components imo must get a different brand name than TomEE. Otherwise you get the same problem as with Geronimo: people will think these

Re: The road to TomEE 8

2017-08-11 Thread Mark Struberg
Perfectly fine. All I want to ensure is that we do not need to wait until we have really all parts. We should be able to do Tomee8 releases even before. And that is imo only possible if we communicate clearly what is in there. LieGrue, strub > Am 11.08.2017 um 10:46 schrieb Jean-Louis

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2017-08-11 Thread David Blevins
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:38 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > Interesting reasoning. What about tackling new specs - like mvc - which > dont have yet a home at asf and would more inline with tomee and require > more activity than "done" projects? I’d be open to that.

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

2017-08-11 Thread David Blevins
> On Aug 11, 2017, at 3:20 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Reusable components make sense they are clearly distinctable. The part which > contains that reusable components imo must get a different brand name than > TomEE. Sheldon would stay named Sheldon. Chatterbox