No worries Mark - I'll just work off the grid for now.
On 12/02/18 21:52, Mark Struberg wrote:
Oki, that was totally not obvious - sorry for getting this wrong ;)
Well but my other points are still valid: how do we like to continue with that
stuff?With sheldon, etc getting donated we HAVE to
Oki, that was totally not obvious - sorry for getting this wrong ;)
Well but my other points are still valid: how do we like to continue with that
stuff?With sheldon, etc getting donated we HAVE to solve those issues.Except if
we say that those parts will become heavily TomEE centric and would
You can PR it @geronimo if it is to add test coverage or to contribute
samples. We are on github normally.
Let me know if you need some help/pointers.
Le 12 févr. 2018 21:21, "Andy Gumbrecht" a
écrit :
> There is no implementation here at all, it is just the current spec
> modules to start writ
There is no implementation here at all, it is just the current spec
modules to start writing tests. I wanted to start writing a test for
geronimo config without interfering with anything else. No worries. I'll
revert it and start a private branch.
On 12/02/18 20:45, Mark Struberg wrote:
Well
Well the last discussion was about finding a way to unify the efforts.I totally
don't care whether this will be over at Geronimo or at TomEE.
If it is at TomEE, then this effort clearly has to be done in a way which
doesn't confuse users.Which means it must be totally clear which parts are
reus
Hi
Is it a commit/push error? Discussion didnt outcome to that if I got it
right. Discussion led to put it outside tomee.git at least then preference
was more about to concentrate a single effort under Geronimo umbrella for
tomee and asf benefit.
How did we end up here? Did I miss a discussion?
