[tools-dev] OOo source split

2007-10-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi, During the OOoCon, Petr had a presentation about the OOo package splitting. The most important part for a (Linux) package maintainer was to be able to build parts of OpenOffice.org separately; the thing is that with all the localizations, we are unable to get the build times under some 7

[tools-dev] Re: [porting-dev] cygwin build problem on sb71

2007-10-08 Thread Volker Quetschke
Hi Stephan, first, please use [EMAIL PROTECTED], W32-bash is not really a port, but the only supported way to build OOo on windows outside of Hamburg ;) Stephan Bergmann wrote: Hi all, I received a mail that an apparently cygwin-based buildbot build of CWS sb71 failed, with linker errors

[tools-dev] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-08 Thread Volker Quetschke
CC'ing ESC and [EMAIL PROTECTED], please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only. Hi, while working on some build feature/improvement for OOo W32 builds I realized that we have quite a lot of special casing of tcsh vs. bash. Is that still needed? I would like to remove the support for tcsh builds if

Re: [tools-dev] OOo source split

2007-10-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Ruediger, On Monday 08 October 2007 17:36, Rüdiger Timm wrote: During the OOoCon, Petr had a presentation about the OOo package splitting. The most important part for a (Linux) package maintainer was to be able to build parts of OpenOffice.org separately; the thing is that with all

[tools-dev] Re: [council-esc] Is someone still building OOo with tcsh?

2007-10-08 Thread Pavel Janík
Is that still needed? I would like to remove the support for tcsh builds if possible. Opinions? FWIW: I have moved to using bash this weekend... -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional