gt; > >
> >>> > > > > > > Anyhow, it's important to remember that when initiating an
> >>> > > > "invalidate
> >>> > > > > > > content" request for delivery service X, the important
Please look at the release notes of 1.3.0, might solve your problem.
The revalidation feature doesn't work out of the box. The entry id=1 in the
job_agent table MUST exist as well as name=PURGE must be present in the
d. Ultimately what you're seeing
> > is a CZF miss, unrelated to the geo coordinates.
> > The underlying feature with the coordinates is to select the next best
> > cache group by proximity where healthy caches have a given delivery
> > service assigned. In order to t
Have you tried to simply restart Traffic Ops? We've seen ours (1.6) not
being able to create Certificates after a while.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Nir Sopher wrote:
> ERROR result for http://ops.nirs-tc1.tc-dev.qwilt.com/api/1.2/cdns/name/
> nirs-tc1-cdn/sslkeys.json is:
> > and if this file is served from a cache of its own, the request by X
> > of servers to get the same file would take advantage of caching to reduce
> > the delivery time. sooo.maybe it's a second the first time and a few
> > e
> Maybe an RPM missing?
> Thank you both again.
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Steve Malenfant <smalenf...@gmail.com>
> > Have you tried to simply restart Traffic Ops? We've seen ours (
I didn't know about this which is good information. Does that work on
Traffic Router 1.6?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
> Jeff and I had a quick Slack convo, so I’ll add a followup summary here in
> case anyone else is interested.
Which version of Traffic Control are you using? I believe it's important
you use 1.7.0 because earlier version didn't support different origin port
than 80 in the past.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Muhammed Olgun wrote:
> I'm trying to build a simple PoC of
using TC 1.7.0.
> Thank you!
> 27 Eki 2016 Per, saat 15:18 tarihinde Steve Malenfant <
> şunu yazdı:
> Which version of Traffic Control are you using? I believe it's important
> you use 1.7.0 because earlier version didn't
I'm OK with this. I think most of the revalidate functionality is not well
understood here... I guess I need to look into the API since we are using
the UI to issue revalidate today.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Jeremy Mitchell
> I've created an issue to
> time_appconnect: 0.307
> time_pretransfer: 0.307
> time_redirect: 0.000
> time_starttransfer: 0.781
> time_total: 0.781
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Steve Malenfant <smalenf...@gmail.com>
> > I'm OK with this. I thin
Yes. There is support for both disk and ram based caching depending on
which type is selected for a delivery service.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Burak Sarp
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Traffic Control
has invited Derek Gelinas to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Derek has made a lot of good contribution related to Traffic Ops
and making ATS configuration better and more efficient. Derek has
I'd be interested to know as well. Something we need to work here as well.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Durfey, Ryan
> Guys, any idea when traffic analytics (traffic logs) base code might be
> released to open source?
> Ryan Durfey
> Sr. Product Manager -
Does Traffic Monitor (Java version) have the same problem? If it does, can
the fix be applied?
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Jason Tucker
> Thanks, Jeff.
> And just to clarify - this will *try* to do a graceful shutdown first, wait
> for the timeout period
+1 to move to Golang. Few questions.
Configuration seems like a none issue for us since we are using Ansible, we
would prefer less postinstall interaction as possible as long as the
configuration is documented.
As for the name, do we plan to keep "traffic_ops_golang" in the future?
I'm currently in the process of testing Traffic Ops under docker and making
a ready to go layered image but doing it without the RPM (call it either
dev or prepping docker images). I'm sure there is work ongoing and would
like to discuss.
- Is there a requirement github/lib/pq to
ocker as well. I'll comment on a few
> things below..
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Steve Malenfant <smalenf...@gmail.com>
> > I'm currently in the process of testing Traffic Ops under docker and
> > a ready to go layered ima
Is there a requirement to have it configured per delivery service? If not,
would enabling global header rewrite in plugin.config would work for a
specific DSCP value?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mike Sandman (misandma) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I’m beginning
+1 on this. Although no experience with BGP. I've been looking into OpenBMP
lately which seems to support BGP-LS.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
> Definitely the first, the second maybe as a stretch goal.
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:23 AM Eric
+1. We have a hard time convincing our DNS team to enable EDNS0 in our
caching DNS (because of the caching implications). I do see great benefits
to localize DNS DS.
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Ori Finkelman wrote:
> This will also work nicely with the effort to have a
> > Feedback:
> > We found that EDNS0 Client Subnet, as currently standardized and
> implemented, doesn't work well with our distribution/scale. Could actually
> increase the number of upstream queries and memory required to store
> responses by 1000x.
> > Ry
Try to add "network_mode: bridge" under your services inside of the
docker-compose file. I know I had to do this to build under Linux, but
works fine under OSX Docker Engine.
We do have the problem here since we don't allow docker to manage iptables.
This problem is limited to
I'm just going through what it takes to upgrade Traffic Server from 5.3.2
to 7.1 right now. There is a few things that changed in the configuration
which are easy to take care of, some others are not.
The easy one which I'm already taking care of :
- logs_xmls.config changed to
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Dewayne Richardson
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Dave Neuman wrote:
> > I thought we already had a vote on this? Maybe I am thinking of the
> > to github" vote which I assumed to be
I observed the same thing when I upgraded my instance of Traffic Ops. It
had duplicated "tm.toolname" as a key. +1 on the proposal.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Mitchell
> IMO there seems to be an inherent flaw with global parameters
Is there any Release Notes associated with this release? 1,337 changes and
the link above will only display 250 of them.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> Hello All,
> I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC1
> The vote is open for at least 72
There has been a vote on not maintaining a CHANGELOG file in the past and
seems like we leaned toward an automated process. I believe none of them
had happened (please correct me if not).
I have been upgrading Traffic Control from 2.1 to 2.2 this week and found
+1 here as well.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
> Hey Hank,
> It looks like you have the votes you need to pass, but can you leave it
> open a little longer for those of us that haven't gotten a chance to test
> On Tue, Nov 14,
All my "edge." are gone after an upgrade. Is there a different parameter to
used for the DNS delivery services migration?
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Rawlin Peters
> Hey folks,
> A new feature for Delivery Services has been merged
ORT has backward compatibility issues with previous 2.2 versions.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:12 AM, David Neuman
> Checked hashes
> Ran `pkg` to build the RPMs
> Installed Traffic Ops
> Ran postinstall
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Robert Butts
+1 based on the ORT changes.
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Robert Butts wrote:
> Hello All,
> I've prepared a release for v2.2.0-RC6
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PPMC votes are cast.
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
Maybe I'm wrong here, but in the new API to generate config files, you can
have a single line separated with __RETURN__ instead of having to provision
a bunch line entries.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
> Someone else may
We haven't touched those tables @Cox. We use the built-in content
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Hongfei Zhang (hongfezh) wrote:
> @Dew - we did not touch job_result table. Thanks, -Hongfei
> On 5/1/18, 5:03 PM, "Dewayne Richardson"
release notes should be formatted, and how they
> might be auto-generated. If you have any, please let me know.
> On 10/24/2017 07:26 AM, Steve Malenfant wrote:
>> Is there any Release Notes associated with this release? 1,337 changes and
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Oren Shemesh wrote:
> Looked at this site, I can see only benefits !
> This is the easy & professional way to go.
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> > +100 ( yeah -- I can do that! )
I'm not exactly sure how MaxMind return this default value but would there
be a way to use the MISS location specified in the DS? Seems like that is
what it was intended for.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Rivas, Jesse
> Hi all,
We have observed this in the past as well. We are still running
traffic_stats 2.1.0 and using this cronjob as workaround for now.
$ cat /etc/cron.d/traffic_stats_restart
#Ansible: Restart Traffic Stats
0 8 * * * root /etc/init.d/traffic_stats restart >/dev/null 2>&1
On Mon, Feb
Would deleting the certificate only remove the "latest" copy/alias? The
certificate and keys should still be retrievable manually. Yes/No?
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
> I think I can get on board with not allowing a user to change the CDN. If
gt; Hi Steve, for the upgrade did you go from 2.1 -> 2.2?
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Steve Malenfant <smalenf...@gmail.com>
> > +1
> > Upgraded the following succesfully to RC1:
> > Traffic Ops
> > Traffic Portal
Upgraded the following succesfully to RC1:
Traffic Monitor (from java to golang)
I only opened a single issue related with some required parameter for
Traffic Monitor. But if used according to the default RASCAL profiles, no
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC3
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM Hank Beatty wrote:
> > +1
> > On 03/01/2018 10:41 AM, Dave Neuman wrote:
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > > After a great discussion amongst the Apache Traffic
Mail list logo