On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Now Tuscany is a TLP. We have to make a few changes in the parent pom [1],
such as:
1) Remove incubating from the version numbers (including the java/pom.xml
[2]).
2) Change distributionManagement section so that
Dear apmail,
It looks like with the move from Incubator to TLP email that still gets sent
to the old mailing lists ([EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) now gets lost, is there anyway to get it
automatically forwarded to the new mailing lists (dev@tuscany.apache.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Comments in line...
...ant
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ramkumar R wrote:
Thanks Simon, I understand the purpose here.
On 6/24/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Works now, thanks!
...ant
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fixed.
--- On Mon, 6/30/08, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Forwarding mail from the old [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the
new dev
]
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:06 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Now Tuscany is a TLP. We have to make a few changes in the parent pom
[1],
such as:
1) Remove incubating from the version
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:52 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
b) A variety of functional components, that represent sets of coherent
functions.
Each consists of a series of the basic modules
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:48 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes trunk is now on version 3-SNAPSHOT but the 1.3 branch is still on
2-incubating isn't it? We'd need to do an official release of the new one to
use
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm resending this message, originally sent on 24 June, because it
doesn't show up in either markmail or the Apache mail archive.
Apparently it went into the tuscany-dev black hole.
Simon
Original Message
should be checked in under this
features folder instead of modules which hosts all the physical/atomic
modules. The other option is to check them in under distribution. The
distro should be just an aggregation of one or more features.
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED
, was: Distribution zips and what
they contain, was: SCA runtimes
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to reactivate the discussion on how we can improve the
extensibility story based on the following
This went to me not the dev list, comments in line
...ant
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can you provide us some use cases for the aggregated jars?
I think it's very important that we don't physically merge module jars into
a feature jar.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that the fundamental difference we're having is whether two
tuscany features can contain the same module. For example, if I build the
web service feature and jsonrpc feature, both of them would contain
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:38 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that the fundamental difference we're having is whether two
tuscany features can contain the same module. For example, if I build the
web
I made this change in trunk yesterday in r673459, will merge it to the 1.3
branch today if no problems are reported with the change in trunk.
...ant
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:48 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to extend the discussion a bit to help us better understand
what user experience we would like to bring to Geronimo developers/users
with Tuscany/SCA.
I suggest that we use a usage scenario-driven
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need
attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
https://issues.apache.org/jira
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:43 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to extend the discussion a bit to help us better understand
what user experience we would like to bring to Geronimo developers/users
There has been a few emails suggesting changing to use the definitions.xml
to define the available binding and implementation extensions, eg see [1],
[2], [3].
This seems quite a significant change over how things work today so before
embarking on it is this something we want to do? Seems like a
that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to
get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?
In the meantime the distros at
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/ are still useful for
reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.
...ant
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder [EMAIL
the purpose of this thread is to identify what's common
to SCA in all hosting environment and what's specific to Geronimo. Base on
the classification, we should implement the common features in a generic way
and specific things in a Geronimo way.
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Let me take the two prototypes to build the Collection and compare them
aspect by aspect.
1) Aggregated jar:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/modules/scdl4j/pom.xml
2) Feature/Distro:
FYI . We used to use BouncyCastle with Tuscany and WS-Security but
removed it due to the patent issue.
...ant
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Subject: Fwd: BouncyCastle without patented IDEA algorithms
To:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Luckily i started RC2 last night but then decided to finish it off this
morning so there's still time to get that in.
Thanks. I'm about to get on a plane so I won't have connectivity
I think i've seen something similar and went back to an older maven release
and it went away, currently i use 2.0.7
...ant
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am having trouble with a fresh build on a new machine. I am not
getting fatal errors but
been trying to obtain to
improve information sharing.
We could also ask for input on C++. It is not clear how much C++ is used in
real production environment and if both C++ and Java are used in the in same
environment. We have seen a few questions around this area.
On 7/15/08, ant elder
Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tried with 2.0.7 with the same results. I'll try to repeat this on a
fresh build on my old machine.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think i've seen something similar and went back to an older maven
release
and it went
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Wojtek Janiszewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I fulfilled almost all TODOs initially planned for CORBA binding. There are
also 2 other functionalities left (support for CORBA arrays, support for
CORBA unions) which are rather simple to implement and
I've raised TUSCANY-2480 for this.
...ant
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:08 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems like a significant regression, would you raise a JIRA against
the 1.3 release so we make sure it gets fixed before the release?
...ant
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Luckily i started RC2 last night
needed?
...ant
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:02 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following on from this there has been another problem found in 1.3 with the
new generated wsdl - http://apache.markmail.org/message/fryloi6byuyjqvrlfor
which I've raised TUSCANY-2480, could someone take a look
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I did some investigation and it turned out it is not a trivial issue.
Recently we now move the Java2WSDL generation to the build phase. When
Tuscany is deployed as a web
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Big +1 from me, i'd probably prefer the messages go to the commit list but
either would be an improvement.
...ant
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have recently changed the Tuscany continuum build schedules to once
a day instead of multiple times
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just forced the TUSCANYWIKI autoexport to be rebuilt. The exported
content should be consistent with the WIKI now. Please let me know if you
still see issues.
I am seeing major problems with
As we're sorting out the cwiki admins its reminded me of this, what is the
status of this and do we have any continuum admins in Tuscany able to add
committers to the Tuscany group?
As the notifications are going to start being sent to the mailing list again
i think we should have all committers
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just forced the TUSCANYWIKI autoexport to be rebuilt
Please review and vote on the release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java
1.3 release.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC2/
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
repository, and eclipse update site.
, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to build the 1.3 tag from scratch and ran into a blocker as
reported by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2498.
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Friday, July 25, 2008 7:05 AM
*To:* dev
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'm seeing the following error when building binding-ws-axis2. Anybody
else seeing this?
...
Well that was with a revision from yesterday, with
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As being discussed on the other thread, we all agree that it's very
important to keep the trunk build successfully all the time.
Builds will break its a fact of life, and this is especially true in an open
source
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
The system id was set to namespace + a file name generated by JAXB,
such as schema3.xsd. In the failing test case, it was
http://other.ws.binding.sca.tuscany.apache.org/schema3.xsd; and
your confluence id if you are not on
the list.
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Friday, July 25, 2008 5:18 AM
*To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: How do I get my Continuum build server account unlocked?
As we're sorting out the cwiki admins its reminded
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This runs fine for me both before when the distribution was built and
trying again now, both times with a clean repo with both Sun and IBM JDKs so
i
to the list soon on my findings.
++Vamsi
[1]
http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_JAVAEE_Integration_V100.pdf
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:37 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, from the initial email there were only two points labelled [Common to
SCA]:
* Manage
one SCADefinitions.
One hack would be to set Intent to resolved during the read phase.
Or we merge all the definitions before the resolve. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* ant elder mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Saturday, July 26, 2008 4:20 AM
*To:* dev
the policy definitions are loaded.
On 7/28/08, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see
The RC3 release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3 release are now
available, please review and vote to release.
The artifacts are available for at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC3/http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC3/
This includes the signed binary
Many thanks to everyone for all the reviews of RC2 , there is now an RC3
available which should include all the fixes. See:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/av223xo3w3kashkf
...ant
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the release
: launch.Launch
[java] Java Result: 1
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 0 seconds
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:44 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The RC3 release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3 release are now
available, please review and vote to release.
The artifacts
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The WSDLless itest - testcases worked for me, I believe some other java
process were blocking the port and tests were failing.
Thanks Ant Simon for
Now that Tuscany is a TLP one of the things we could do is create a charter
for the project. Other projects have charters, eg [1], [2], [3], I'm not
sure its actually required these days, if it is several other recently
graduation projects haven't got around to it yet, but even if its not
required
If diff isn't working for you and its all new modules could you attach a zip
of the new stuff to the jira?
...ant
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have created new sample modules as part of extending the spring-bigbank
sample, and have raised
I've fix that failing test now, thought i'd done that yesterday but left
that commit out sorry.
...ant
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Today - 11:00am UK time - I updated from trunk and then built and I get
none of the errors listed in this
Just as a FWIW with all the recent build problems, a clean build for me
right now everything is building fine with no errors
...ant
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Today
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.3 release of
the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service
Component Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at
simplifying SOA application development. These specifications are
being
Now that 1.3 is just out I'd like to do another release! Its been over a
month since the 1.3 branch was taken from trunk and I've been doing a lot of
work on the JMS binding since then so would like to get that code released.
The 1.2.1 release showed its not too much work to do a point release so
The Axis2 guide also has a bit more info about weblogic classloading issues
- http://ws.apache.org/axis2/1_4/app_server.html
...ant
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I've answered my own question :)
For anyone interested, you can add the following
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Some things that come to mind...
fix dependency generation so that ant scripts always match distributed
jars.
automate sample testing
wrap up some of the scripts that we have been using from the release wiki
page [1] into
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
snip
Re. JMS. I'm a little nervous about putting completely new function out in
1.3.1. JMS changes that fix deficiencies from 1.3 would be candidates
though.
What is it that makes you nervous about adding the JMS changes?
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
snip
Re. JMS. I'm a little nervous about putting completely new function out in
1.3.1. JMS changes that fix deficiencies from 1.3 would be candidates
Looks like the last snapshot publish has set the group access to read only.
Could that be changed to r/w so i can publish the latest snapshots?
...ant
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:18 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the last snapshot publish has set the group access to read only.
Could that be changed to r/w so i can publish the latest snapshots?
...ant
Any update on this Luciano? All the files from the last publish
org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.osgi.launcher.LauncherBundleActivator start
INFO: 44 org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.osgi INSTALLED 2
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The module node2-launcher-osgi build hangs for me, is it building ok for
anyone else?
Gets this far in the tests then sits
had successful build on both Windows and Linux before the commit. I'm on
Maven 2.0.9. Can you try it? Can you also try mvn -U?
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:34 AM
*To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: svn commit: r684808
Works for me now thanks.
...ant
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never mind. I just responded to the orginal thread from Mark and a fix
has been checked in. Please update and try again.
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent
Looks like this is fixed and its now working for me today.
...ant
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:36 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine is similar but i'm using the Sun JDK and get the same hang.
...ant
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
SCADomain APIs were introduced in Tuscany before we come up the Node APIs
which are more consistent with the Domain concepts in the SCA spec. Even
though we should now use the Node APIs, there are still quite a few
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We now have the Node APIs in the code base with 2 suffix, such as SCANode2,
SCANode2Factory and tuscany-node2-api, tuscany-node2-impl. I propose that we
rename them back to Node/node.
If there is no objection, I'll
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:39 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
SCADomain APIs were introduced in Tuscany before we come up
*From:* ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11:38 PM
*To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Tuscany integration with Geronimo: What's common to SCA and
what's sepcific to Geronimo?, was: Re: GSoC Project - Tuscany SCA support in
the Geronimo admin Console
FYI
for volunteering :-). We can
start
to deprecate the SCADomain and migrate to Node APIs.
Thanks,
Raymond
From: ant elder
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 12:19 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Port the DefaultSCADomain implementation to use
tuscany-node2-impl
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:14 AM
and
then perhaps look into settling on some longer term final api?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
We now have the Node APIs
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:57 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED
Welcome Douglas.
...ant
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted Douglas Siqueira Leite as a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations Douglas!
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:51 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:57 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue
and leave the
SCANode2Factory/SCANode2 deprecated. Existing samples or itests will be
migrated to use SCANodeFactory/SCANode. Meanwhile I'll change the maven
artifact ids from node2-xxx to node-xxx.
Thanks,
Raymond
From: ant elder
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 6:17 AM
To: dev
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:52 AM, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't deprecation mean the code will be there for a while and therefore
the new code will not break existing user code?
How long will deprecated
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:42 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:52 AM, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't
The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are now
available, please review and vote to release.
The artifacts are available for at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
repository, and
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Naizheng Bian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We try to extend SIP in Tuscany. We plan to use SUN's sailfin project in
extension. As I know the sailfin project takes
the Common Development and Distribution License. Will it be a problem if we
do this? I mean
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The artifacts got downloaded and unpacked sucessfully. Ran few samples and
demos, works for me.
I would like to clarify about the number of samples available in the binary
distribution and the source distribution. The
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:42 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I think could be better is the way applications get hold of the
ComponentContext. Currently its done using a context attribute but I think
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I have built the demo-alert-aggregator war file as given in the
instructions in Java SCA 1.3.1 (RC1) distribution and tried to deploy (not
run, just deploy) the war on Geronimo 2.1.2. I ended up with the
following
2.1.1, Geronimo Tomcat 2.1.2 and Geronimo Jetty 2.1.2. I ended up with
the same error message. I am running Geronimo on Windows XP w Service Pack
2.
++Vamsi
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:51 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
[EMAIL
Yes, i see it too. Looks like it was the commit for the fix for
TUSCANY-2513.
...ant
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I see this issue with revision 688998,
[INFO]
elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:42 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:52 AM
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
snip
I think we do need to maintain a high level of backward compatibility. I
would go further and say that we need to start testing for it, e.g run our
trunk test suite(s?) against old Tuscany versions and be able to
I also share the concerns Luciano mentioned, maybe what we need is just
some more documentation about how ASF releases get done instead of trying to
change the release process, it would be good to advertise the ability to
vote for JIRAs.
Just to remind what the ASF release policy is: anyone can
While working on the JMS binding I've been wondering if we could enhance the
current data binding framework to provide more APIs which a binding could
use help with the process of conversion to/from Tuscany messages to protocol
specific messages. I don't have a completely clear idea of what this
++Vamsi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are
now
available, please review and vote to release.
The artifacts are available for at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1
Can you look in the logs folder in the Tomcat install folder and there
should be one of the logs in there which gives more information about what
the problem was that caused the TuscanyServletFilter to fail to start. If
that log info isn't obvious post it back here and we can help decipher it.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:54 AM, ant elder [EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ran into an issue with jruby-complete 1.0. The jar is pulled in by
tuscany-implementation-script. Its pom.xml has a bug (an invalid property)
which prevents the tuscany-maven-bundle-plugin from creating an OSGi
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:34 AM, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea. I'll add a reminder note about ASF release policy to the
website.
You mentioned, 'it would be good to advertise the ability to vote for
JIRAs.'
Can you share what your thought is for using voting for JIRAs?
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.3.1 release of
the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service
Component Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at
simplifying SOA application development. These specifications are
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Dan Becker to become a committer. Welcome
aboard Dan.
...ant
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Ramkumar Ramalingam to become a committer.
Congratulations and welcome Ram
Simon
Welcome Ram.
...ant
1 - 100 of 2760 matches
Mail list logo
