On 11/19/09 21:59, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Kay Ramme kay.ra...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Lukasz,
could you give a brief overview over your system, the OS, the arch and the
OOo version etc.? That would help debugging this. You find the detailed OOo
version in the about
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Stephan Bergmann
stephan.bergm...@sun.com wrote:
On 11/19/09 21:59, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Kay Ramme kay.ra...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Lukasz,
could you give a brief overview over your system, the OS, the arch and
the
OOo
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Kay Ramme kay.ra...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Lukasz,
could you give a brief overview over your system, the OS, the arch and the
OOo version etc.? That would help debugging this. You find the detailed OOo
version in the about dialog.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Kay Ramme kay.ra...@sun.com wrote:
Ahhh, I missed this mail ;-)
As Stephan said, it is probably better to ask on the go-oo lists or to
switch to vanilla (http://download.openoffice.org).
So, I've upgraded to the 3.1 version of OO. This seem to fixed
Hi Lucasz,
if I understand your other mail correctly, the office dies for some
reason. You may want to attach a debugger or something to see what happens.
How are you actually starting the office process? If it is under your
control, you may want to issue a wait (or similar) system call. The
Ahhh, I missed this mail ;-)
As Stephan said, it is probably better to ask on the go-oo lists or to
switch to vanilla (http://download.openoffice.org).
Regards
Kay
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 11/12/09 18:49, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
I did not see my application fail or get disconnected
On 11/12/09 18:49, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
I did not see my application fail or get disconnected in non-headless mode.
I do see it failing in headless.
[...]
Are there any differences in headless vs non-headless? Is there a
different mailing list I should be asking these questions? (headless
