On 7. Dec 2022, at 16:05, Roberto Carlos Toledano Gómez
wrote:
>
> Hello It's a shame I used it in an old project and its integration with
> annotators implemented in C++ and Python was fantastic. Unfortunately I
> don't have much free time to help, because I currently work for Openbravo
> and
Hi Eddie, Richard and all,
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 4:17 PM Eddie Epstein wrote:
> If nobody offers to put in 1-2 weeks of work, I would vote to retire.
>
I have been lurking on this mailing list for years and this seems like a
good moment to participate.
Python has attracted most of the
[ x ] +1 - go on and retire
Eddie
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:45 AM Richard Eckart de Castilho
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I propose to retire UIMA DUCC on Dec 21 2022.
>
> The original creators and maintainers of UIMA DUCC are no longer working
> on it
> leaving the codebase unmaintained.
>
> We
On 7. Dec 2022, at 22:17, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
> It would also require first migrating the code to git.
You mean like this:
https://github.com/apache/uima-uimacpp
I even tried giving it a reasonably modern README file.
Cheers,
-- Richard
> You mean like this:
>
> https://github.com/apache/uima-uimacpp
>
> Yes, very much like that! :)
Eddie
I believe there are compilation problems with newer versions of C/C++
compilers, and if memory serves me correctly, compatibility problems with
one or more newer versions of dependent libs: activemq-cpp, icu4c, apr, and
xerces. Dan Gruhl did a bunch of work refactoring uimacpp code to compile,
and
reckart opened a new pull request, #269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/269
**What's in the PR**
- Use reflection to pry-open a protected class that was previously public -
frankly, this is not a good solution...
**How to test manually**
* Upgrade to log42
[x] +1 - go on and retire
Peter
Am 07.12.2022 um 08:45 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
Hi all,
I propose to retire UIMA DUCC on Dec 21 2022.
The original creators and maintainers of UIMA DUCC are no longer working on it
leaving the codebase unmaintained.
We currently have no CI build
[x] +1 - go on and retire
Peter
Am 07.12.2022 um 08:46 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
Hi all,
I propose to retire the UIMA C++ SDK on Dec 21 2022.
The original creators and maintainers of UIMA C++ SDK are no longer working on
it
leaving the codebase unmaintained.
We currently have no
[x] +1 - go on and retire
Peter
Am 07.12.2022 um 08:53 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
Hi all,
I propose to retire the v2 of UIMA Java SDK, uimaFIT, Ruta and UIMA AS on Dec
21 2022.
As far as I know, nobody plans any further releases of any of the v2 versions of
* Apache UIMA Java SDK
reckart commented on issue #267:
URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/issues/267#issuecomment-1340897477
Added a nasty workaround using reflection. An alternative solution would be
better
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
reckart merged PR #269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/269
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
reckart opened a new issue, #270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/issues/270
**Describe the refactoring action**
Update dependencies.
- [ ] log4j2 2.17.1 -> 2.19.0
**Expected benefit**
Bug fixes and improvements and compatibility *caugh*.
--
This is
reckart opened a new pull request, #271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/271
**What's in the PR**
- log4j 2.17.1 -> 2.19.0
- junit 5.8.2 -> 5.9.1
- assertj 3.22.0 -> 3.23.1
**How to test manually**
* No specific test procedure
**Automatic testing**
Hello It's a shame I used it in an old project and its integration with
annotators implemented in C++ and Python was fantastic. Unfortunately I
don't have much free time to help, because I currently work for Openbravo
and time is short, and I have to live on something.
My symbolic vote: -1.
Best
15 matches
Mail list logo
